The Respondent is Malik Ijaz, Trade Fast, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Maier
Sole Panelist
Date: October 1, 2025
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Anthropic, PBC v. Malik Ijaz,Trade Fast
Case No. D2025-3374
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-10-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Zachary Winslow, Ukraine.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds the mark ELASTICSEARCH is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly,
the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy.
...
2024-11-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is ipse Commun, Marius Keppler, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with One.com A/S (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the IPSEN mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-12-09 - Case Details
Discussion and Findings
6.1 Preliminary Issue: Consolidation of a Complaint for more than one disputed domain name
Paragraphs 3(c) and 10(e) of the Rules respectively provide that:
“The complaint may relate to more than one domain name, provided that the domain names are registered by the same domain-name holder.”
...See Speedo Holdings B.V. v. Programmer, Miss Kathy Beckerson, John Smitt, Matthew Simmons,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0281; WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition (“WIPO Overview 3.0”), section 4.11.2)
In the present case, the Complainant submitted evidence that the layout of the websites to which the disputed domain names resolve are highly similar and contain highly similar designations, and that one of the hyperlinks from the disputed domain name redirects to a so-called “IQOS official website” but is actually that of the other disputed domain name .
...
2020-09-15 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the .GE Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the .GE Policy), the Rules for .GE Domain
Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the .GE Rules), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for .GE Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the Supplemental Rules).
...The disputed domain name incorporates the Complainant’s XIAOMI trademark
in its entirety and merely adds the generic term “my” at the beginning of the disputed domain name.
...
2025-09-05 - Case Details
The Center verif ied that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisf ied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
.../Ian Lowe/
Ian Lowe
Sole Panelist
Date: October 14, 2024
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Equinor ASA v. Sophia
Case No. D2024-3440
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2024-10-21 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...In the present case, the Panel finds that the consolidation of the domain name disputes is justified as, inter
alia: (i) the disputed domain names were registered with the same registrar; (ii) the disputed domain names
were registered on the same day at close intervals of each other, (iii) the disputed domain names are similar
in construction in that they incorporate the Complainant’s trademark, and one disputed domain name has an
additional term, (iv) the websites to which the disputed domain names resolve are similar, (v) the contact
details disclosed by the Registrar are similar (same contact address, same telephone number).
...
2023-08-18 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint (hereafter the “Complaint”) satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...They are, in essence, being passively held by the Respondent. Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0003 established that, in certain circumstances, the passive holding of a domain name could amount to use of the domain name in bad faith.
...
2015-06-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Beka Karanadze, Georgia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-12-26 - Case Details
On March 21, 2007, the Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Respondent registered the disputed domain name
on November 27, 2004.
5. Discussion
In its Response to the Complaint, Respondent agreed to transfer the disputed domain name to the Complainant, upon order of the Panel. ...
2007-05-15 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Prior decisions under the Policy have recognized the reputation and worldwide renown of the Complainant’s
trademarks CASINO DE MONACO and CASINO DE MONTE-CARLO.1
The disputed domain name (“First Disputed Domain Name”) was registered on June 20,
2022; the disputed domain name (“Second Disputed Domain Name”) was registered on
August 17, 2022; and the disputed domain name (“Third Disputed Domain Name”) was
registered on September 10, 2022.
...
2023-03-22 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...As the disputed domain names currently resolve to inactive sites their bad faith use is less obvious. The Complainant cites Telstra Corporation Limited v. ...
2018-04-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mikhail Dmitruk, Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Registrar of Domain Names REG.RU LLC
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name was registered on January 22, 2022. It currently redirects to a Russian language
website at the domain name where products under the trademark THE ORDINARY are being
offered for sale. ...
2023-05-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Nano Techan, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap,
Inc. ...The Respondent has been utilizing the similarity of the Domain Name to the Complainant’s
domain name, the website at which offers and advertises the Complainant’s goods and
services.
...
2024-09-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is Maximus d.o.o. (Ivica Granic), Croatia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Corehub S.R.L. ...Discussion and Findings
6.1 Expiry of the disputed domain name
According to the Registrar verification of August 8, 2022, the disputed domain name was set to expire on
September 14, 2022.
...
2022-10-11 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...It is established by numerous decisions made under the Policy that adding generic words that are related to a complainant’s business is likely to lead the panel to find a confusing similarity between the disputed domain name and the complainant’s trademark (Marriott International, Inc. v. Cafe au lait, NAF Claim No. ...
2011-02-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is Nadine Wannemaker, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with Hongkong
Kouming International Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the Disputed Domain Name be transferred to the Complainant.
/Andrew Sim/
Andrew Sim
Sole Panelist
Date: April 11, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
A&S Holdings (AUS) Pty Ltd v. ...
2025-04-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is John Dowe, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com,
LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds the is recognizable within the Domain Name. Accordingly, the Domain Name is confusingly
similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2026-05-04 - Case Details
The Respondent is xpress digitalz, Litedigital, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name has n...
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. ...
2026-05-04 - Case Details
The Respondent is Abdullah Al Zubair, Bangladesh.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
/Assen Alexiev/
Assen Alexiev
Sole Panelist
Date: June 23, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Dell Inc. v. ...
2025-06-25 - Case Details