As this Panel discussed in detail, but in different factual circumstances, in Covance, Inc. and Covance Laboratories Ltd. v. The Covance Campaign,
WIPO Case No. D2004-0206, Internet users will necessarily be confused by the use of a domain name that incorporates the Complainant’s trade mark but which does not contain any kind of additional modifier that would assist in signifying that the domain name at issue is not necessarily associated with, or sponsored by, the trade mark owner. ...As noted above it is also apparent that the disputed domain name is identical to Complainant’s domain name . This Panel therefore finds that the disputed domain name was registered bad faith.
...
2018-05-09 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint, together with the amended Complaint, satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademarks. The Respondent’s incorporation of the Complainant’s trademark in full in the disputed domain name is evidence that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s marks. ...
2021-09-13 - Case Details
Buckstein, P.A., United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with 1&1 Internet AG.
3. ...Leibowitz who stated that he was only 15 years old, that someone recently stole his identity and used his name to get the disputed domain name, and that he wanted to sign the disputed domain name over to the Center at no charge. ...
2008-12-19 - Case Details
The Respondent represents himself. The disputed domain name is registered in the name of SMS Demag Co. Ltd ("the Company"). However, the Complainant alleges, and the Respondent concedes, that registration of the domain name by the company was "a mistake" and that Seung Gon, Kim is the correct Respondent.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain names are and . The Registrar is Network Solutions Inc., of Herndon, Virginia, USA ("the Registrar").
3. ...
2001-01-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is John Rochwell of Tenterden, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...However, it appears to be the case that the very purpose in the Respondent choosing the Domain Name it did was to deliberately create a false impression of association with the Complainant. In Drexel University v. ...
2018-05-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Pinsents Masons, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-07-22 - Case Details
The Complainant further contends that the Respondent was under a continuing duty to ensure that the disputed domain name did not violate the Complainant’s trademark rights and that and any such violation, even after the date of acquisition of the disputed domain name, should be deemed retroactive bad faith for the purposes of the Policy (e.g., Octogen Pharmacal Company, Inc. v. ...The Respondent states that it acquired the disputed domain name at a Snapnames.com domain name auction on April 6, 2006, and produces, in support of that statement, a Snapnames.com receipt for the sale of the disputed domain name, dated April 6, 2006, and addressed to the Respondent. ...
2020-05-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Obi Frank, United Arab Emirates.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with 1API GmbH (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-09-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is Idah Idah, Indonesia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Key-Systems GmbH (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-05-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is Richard Khalifa, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verif ied that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisf ied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2026-04-09 - Case Details
The Respondent is huade wang, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Sav.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The omission of the letter “t” in the disputed domain name does not
prevent a finding of confusing similarity between the Complainant’s TICKET TAILOR trade mark and the
disputed domain name, as the trade mark is clearly recognizable within the disputed domain name.
...
2026-08-03 - Case Details
The Respondent is Bruce King, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...KG v. Bruce King
Case No. D2026-2293
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2026-07-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is 胡燕 (Yan Hu), China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Chengdu West Dimension Digital
Technology Co., Ltd. ...The Complainant states that it is the owner of numerous domain names, including the domain name
, registered on April 3, 2003.
The Respondent registered the disputed domain name on September 21, 2023. ...
2023-12-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Wuping Liu, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainants have
not granted any authorization for the Respondent to make use of its META and QUEST trademarks, in a
domain name or otherwise. The disputed domain name resolves to a parking page that lists the disputed
domain name for sale. ...
2023-03-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Sophia, Sophia, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Alibaba.com Singapore E-Commerce Private
Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The aforementioned trademark and domain name were registered prior to the disputed domain name, which
was registered on October 13, 2024. ...
2024-11-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Kyoko Tran, Luxembourg.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Nicenic International Group Co.,
Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2024-04-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Liu Baoqun, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gname.com Pte. ...Therefore, these facts do not support a claim of
a bona fide offering of goods or services under the “Oki Data test”. See Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ASD,
Inc., WIPO Case No. D2001-0903.
Furthermore, the nature of the disputed domain name carries a risk of implied affiliation. ...
2024-03-14 - Case Details
Respondent is Soulaimane El Maimouni, Morocco.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with DropCatch.com 1192 LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...Hartung
Sole Panelist
Date: August 21, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
OMEGA SA, SWATCH AG v. Soulaimane El Maimouni
Case No. D2024-2747
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2024-08-22 - Case Details
Respondent is 苗星星 (miao xing xing), 上海钝敢利智能科技有限公司 (shang hai dun gan li zhi neng ke ji you
xian gong si), China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with DNSPod, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant’s QLIK trademarks predate the registration of the disputed domain name.
Respondent has not provided evidence of the reason to register the disputed domain name. ...
2025-01-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is Timo Schirmer, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Cronon GmbH (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2024-12-13 - Case Details