Pursuant to Article 21(1) of the Commission Regulation (EU) No. 874/2004 and Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that:
The disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by national law of a Member State and / or European Union law.
...
2022-02-22 - Case Details
This Panel is satisfied, in view of the evidence submitted and on balance that the disputed domain names are indeed subject to a common control.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has established rights in the MARSHALL and MARSHALL HEADPHONES trademarks.
...
2020-05-27 - Case Details
Respondent
Except for the prior Complaint communications between the Parties, the Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Once the ccTLD “.co” is ignored (which is appropriate in this case), the disputed domain name consists of the Complainant’s registered word trademark ONATERA in its entirety. ...
2020-12-01 - Case Details
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
As is explained in section 1.3 of the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition (“WIPO Overview 3.0”), to establish unregistered or common law trademark rights, the complainant must show that its mark has become a distinctive identifier which consumers associate with the complainant’s goods and/or services. ...
2021-02-24 - Case Details
On July 1, 2016, CFQld changed its name to Lifeflight Australia Limited.
5. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
There is no dispute between the Complainant and Careflight Limited that the Complainant is the owner of trademark rights in CAREFLIGHT or that the disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant’s trademark.
...
2016-12-13 - Case Details
In circumstances that the Respondent has not objected to this request, has not participated in the proceeding in any way, and in the interests of efficiency and the cost effectiveness of these proceedings, the Panel accedes to the Complainant’s request and orders that the proceeding should be in the English language.
6.2. Substantive Issues
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns registered trade mark rights for its BOUGICORD mark as set out above and in particular, the International registration 259935 registered in 1962 and French trade mark registration number 1380504 filed in 1986. ...
2016-11-11 - Case Details
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has established rights in the mark ASIANET by virtue of its Indian registered trade marks.
...
2018-10-02 - Case Details
The Panel therefore concludes that it would be appropriate for English to be adopted as the language of the proceeding.
6.2. Substantive Issues
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is identical to the BALMAIN trade mark in which the Complainant has rights. ...
2018-03-09 - Case Details
The Panel thus determines that the above circumstances entitle the Complainants to bring this Complaint against the Respondent.
6.2. Substantive Matters
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel is satisfied that the Complainants have registered trademark rights in the BAHA MAR mark.
...
2018-10-12 - Case Details
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant's contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns registered rights in the ALDEZ mark by virtue of United States trade mark registration number 5198213 which was filed on March 24, 2016 and registered on May 9, 2017. ...
2017-10-11 - Case Details
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s
contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The domain names and are identical to the Complainant’s trademark BANCOMAT (the gTLDs .org and .biz cannot be taken into consideration when judging identity or similarity).
...
2005-06-16 - Case Details
Thus the Panel holds that whether or not the Complainant initiated sunrise proceedings is not relevant for the present proceeding.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain name is identical to the mark GERMANWINGS, of which the Complainant is a licensee.
...
2009-10-27 - Case Details
These elements are that:
(i) respondent’s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and
(ii) respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and
(iii) respondent’s domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2007-06-29 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical to certain of its registered trademarks and confusingly similar to others, that the Respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name, and that the Respondent registered and has used the disputed domain name in bad faith.
...
2014-08-13 - Case Details
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The test of identity or confusing similarity under the Policy is confined to a comparison of the disputed domain name and the trademark alone, independent of the products for which the domain name is used or other marketing and use factors usually considered in trademark infringement. ...
2012-01-17 - Case Details
The Respondent further denied any claims of receipt or knowledge of any cease and desist letter from the Complainant at any time.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain name is found to be identical to the registered trademark of the Complainant even with any stylized usage or logo additions. ...
2010-03-19 - Case Details
Discussion and Findings
Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy directs that the Complainant must prove each of the following:
(i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and
(ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and
(iii) the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2010-01-25 - Case Details
D2008-1836 “The domain name incorporates a non-distinctive word and is confusingly similar to the Complainant's trade marks.”
- Tiffany (NJ) LLC, Tiffany and Company v. Thomas Stanek,
WIPO Case No. ...
2010-02-18 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Panel refuses to admit this supplemental filing into the record and notes that the Respondent’s subsequent email, which also adds nothing to the proceedings, will also not be admitted to the record.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns a German federal registered trade mark for the WUP word mark under registration number 302014 026280 and that this registration dates from 14 April, 2014. ...
2014-12-19 - Case Details
The Panel holds that the Respondent cannot consistent with the Policy shield its conduct by closing it eyes to whether the domain name it is registering is identical or confusingly similar to the trademark of another. See Media General Communications, Inc. v. Rarenames, WebReg,
WIPO Case No. ...
2014-03-27 - Case Details