Parties' Contentions
A. Complainant
Identical or confusingly similar
The Complainants submit that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainants' VALERO trademarks. ...The Panel accordingly finds that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the First Complainant's trademark VALERO, and that paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy is satisfied.
...
2017-05-15 - Case Details
The third element a complainant must establish is that the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy requires that the Complainant establish that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights. ...On these grounds the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademarks and hence the first element of the Policy has been fulfilled.
...
2017-05-16 - Case Details
Substantive Analysis
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel is satisfied that the Complainant has established that it has registered rights to the Trade Mark.
...The Domain Name is also used in bad faith. The Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Trade Mark used in connection with identical services. There is a likelihood that consumers may be confused that it is linked to the Complainant. ...
2018-03-14 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The first element that the Complainant must establish is that the disputed domain name is identical with, or
confusingly similar to, the Complainant’s trademark rights.
...The Complainant also contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its claimed rights in
CUSTOM PRODUCT PACKAGING and SUSTAINABLE PACKAGING as unregistered trademarks.
...
2026-07-27 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The trademarks put forward by the Complainant demonstrate that the Complainant has rights in LIDL.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-09-26 - Case Details
page 3
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain name is, indeed, confusingly similar to the QLIK and QLIKVIEW trademarks, as they
are entirely incorporated in the disputed domain name.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-04-01 - Case Details
Complainant
The disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. The
disputed domain names incorporate the entirety of the Complainant’s famous trademark. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-06-08 - Case Details
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
page 3
The Complainants’ registered and well-known mark is wholly contained within the Domain Name as its first
element with only the addition of the term “nft”. ...Preliminary Issue – Consolidation – Multiple Complainants
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
C. Rights or Legitimate Interests
D. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-07-05 - Case Details
Further, the disputed domain name adopted by the Respondent is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s
registered rights. The Respondent is trying to take advantage of the THE KNOWLEDGE ACADEMY
trademark to draw traffic to the website, which shows a clear intention of misleading the Internet users.
...The disputed domain name is, indeed, confusingly similar to the THE KNOWLEDGE ACADEMY trademark.
It clearly shows the Complainant’s mark with inversion of the letters “e” and “a”, which can be seen as an
example of typosquatting.
...
2023-01-06 - Case Details
Complainant asserts that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s JUSTGIVING
trademark as it “consists of the whole” of the JUSTGIVING mark.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
7. Decision...
2022-11-25 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel is satisfied that the Complainant owns trademark registrations for its BEIN trademark in numerous
jurisdictions.
...The gTLD “.best” is disregarded when considering whether the respective disputed domain name is
confusingly similar to the earlier trademarks.
For these reasons, the Panel concludes that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the
Complainant’s mark BEIN.
...
2022-11-15 - Case Details
Instead it results in a domain name that is
confusingly similar to Complainant’s mark”.)
The Complainant has established this first element under the Policy.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-12-28 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The evidence presented in the Complaint demonstrates that the Complainant is the owner of trademark registrations for BNP PARIBAS in different jurisdictions as well as the domain name .
The disputed domain name is confusingly similar with the Complainant’s trademark BNP PARIBAS. The intentional misspelling between the disputed domain name and the Complainant’s trademark does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity.
...
2021-08-31 - Case Details
Respondent
Respondent did not reply to Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the disputed domain name , is confusingly similar to the CHEVRON
trademark. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-11-30 - Case Details
The addition of the generic Top-Level-Domain (“gTLD”) “.com” to the disputed domain name is irrelevant to the confusingly similar analysis.
Respondent is neither affiliated with, nor has it been licensed or permitted to use Complainant’s FACEBOOK mark. ...Panels have consistently found that the mere registration of a domain name that is identical or confusingly similar to a widely known trademark by an unaffiliated entity can by itself create a presumption of bad faith (WIPO Overview 3.0, section 3.1.4).
...
2022-01-11 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns rights in the VALERO trademark. There are many UDRP decisions that find that the pairing of a distinctive trademark with less distinctive terms is confusingly similar to the distinctive trademark. ...D2001-0032 ( and confusingly similar to LEXUS). Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Domain Name, which pairs the VALERO trademark with the generic term “credit cards,” which is a service that the Complainant provides, is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s VALERO trademark.
...
2011-09-20 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns rights in the SOLUTIA trademark. There are many UDRP decisions that find that the pairing of a distinctive trademark with less distinctive terms is confusingly similar to the distinctive trademark. ...D2001-0032 ( and confusingly similar to LEXUS). Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Domain Name, which pairs the SOLUTIA trademark with the word “corp,” an abbreviation for the Complainant’s form of business organization, is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s SOLUTIA trademark.
...
2011-04-27 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns rights in the FOR DUMMIES trademark. There are many UDRP decisions that find that the pairing of a distinctive trademark with less distinctive terms is confusingly similar to the distinctive trademark. ...D2001-0032 ( and confusingly similar to LEXUS). Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Domain Name, which pairs the FOR DUMMIES trademark with the generic term “web hosting,” is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s FOR DUMMIES trademark, which is used by a licensee of the Complainant for web hosting services.
...
2011-10-20 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns common law rights in the mark LANDMANN. ...D2001-0032 ( and confusingly similar to LEXUS). Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Domain Name, which pairs a slight spelling variation of the Complainant’s trademark, “landman,” with the less distinctive term “wire,” is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s LANDMANN trademark.
...
2012-02-08 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns rights in the GOT MILK? trademark. There are many UDRP decisions that find that the pairing of a distinctive trademark with less distinctive terms is confusingly similar to the distinctive trademark. ...D2001-0032 (inter alia. and confusingly similar to LEXUS). Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Domain Name, which pairs the GOT MILK? ...
2012-01-04 - Case Details