In particular, the Complainant asserts that:
(1) the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to the Complainant’s GENENTECH trademark,
since they incorporate this mark in its entirety. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2023-11-01 - Case Details
Moreover, the Panel has taken note of the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP
Questions, Third Edition (“WIPO Overview 3.0”) and, where appropriate, will decide consistent with the
consensus views captured therein.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
According to paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy it should be established that the disputed domain name is
identical or confusingly similar to a mark in which the complainant has rights.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2023-06-07 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Under paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy, there are two requirements which the Complainant must establish, first
that it has rights in a trademark or service mark, and second that the disputed domain name is identical or
confusingly similar to the trademark or service mark.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2023-06-13 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2024-04-04 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...The Panel finds the Disputed Domain Name is
confusingly similar to this trademark. Previous UDRP panels have consistently held that domain names are
identical or confusingly similar to a trademark for purposes of the Policy “when the domain name includes the
trademark, or a confusingly similar approximation, regardless of the other terms in the domain name”
(Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. ...
2024-03-26 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2025-05-28 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant holds several trademarks for CELLTRION. These trademarks are registered for various
services in many jurisdictions. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2024-11-14 - Case Details
Complainant
Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the FREEMAN
marks, in which Complainant has rights. The addition of “www” in front of Complainant’s mark FREEMAN is
a mere addition of non-distinctive text and is therefore confusingly similar to Complainant’s mark.
...The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar...
2024-06-07 - Case Details
The Complaint includes the following contentions:
(i) Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant contends that the deletion of the letter “l” in the trademark and the addition of term
“CREDIT” to the trademark BOLLORE and the gTLD suffix “.com” is not sufficient to escape the finding that
the domain name is confusingly similar to the trademark.
...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant submits sufficient evidence for its registered trademark in several jurisdictions through its
International registration. ...
2024-07-10 - Case Details
In the present case, the Panel notes that Respondent has registered the disputed domain name that is
confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademarks STOKO and/or STOKOMANI, as explained above in section
6.A. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2024-09-11 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that it has satisfied each of the elements required under the Policy for a transfer
of the Disputed Domain Name and that the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a
trademark or service mark, in which the Complainant has rights.
Identical or Confusingly Similar
Notably, the Complainant contends that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the
Complainant’s registered trademark AXA, in which the Complainant has rights, noting that its AXA trademark
is famous and notorious.
...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...
2025-09-05 - Case Details
Indeed, previous panels have found that domain names containing a complainant’s trademark
plus the number “999” – as is the case here – are confusingly similar to the trademark. See, e.g., Novartis
AG v. 陈� (Chen Han), WIPO Case No. D2024-5053 (finding confusingly similar to
KISQALI); Newcote International Limited v. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2025-08-12 - Case Details
It is well established that domain names which consist
of a trade mark are considered to be confusingly similar to the relevant mark for the purposes of the first
element regardless of the nature of any added terms. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
C. Identical or Confusingly Similar
D. Rights or Legitimate Interests
E. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-09-13 - Case Details
Therefore, the Panel finds that the Complainant has proven that the disputed domain name is confusingly
similar to the Complainant’s mark. Therefore, the first element of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy is met.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-09-12 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
According to the Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i), the Complainant shall prove that the Disputed Domain Name is
identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-11-24 - Case Details
The Panel determines that the disputed domain name is confusingly
similar to Complainant’s CINTAS trademark.
Complainant has established that it owns rights in the trademark CINTAS, and that the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to that trademark.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Complainant has provided evidence of rights in the trademark CINTAS, including by registration at the USPTO and by use in commerce. ...
2022-11-07 - Case Details
Therefore, the Panel finds that the Complainant has proven that the disputed domain name is confusingly
similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has established rights according to paragraph 4(a)(i) of the
Policy.
...The Panel finds that such use of the
disputed domain name, confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark, certainly does not amount to a
bona fide offering of goods or services or a legitimate noncommercial or fair use. ...
2022-05-31 - Case Details
Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant sets out in the Amended Complaint that the Disputed Domain Name is identical or
confusingly similar to the marks COMFORT KEEPERS in which the Complainant has rights.
...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-06-13 - Case Details
Complainant
The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademarks. The disputed
domain name identically adopts the Complainant’s trademark. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-07-07 - Case Details
Turning to whether the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the Trademark, the Panel
observes that the Domain Name comprises: (a) an exact reproduction of the Trademark, i.e. ...case=D2013-0585
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Case No. DNL2022-0020
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered or Used in Bad Faith...
2022-06-27 - Case Details