The Panel is satisfied that the registrant of record for the Domain Name is Respondent and will therefore proceed to analyze whether the three elements of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy are satisfied by Complainant in this proceeding.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Pursuant to paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy, Complainant must first of all establish rights in a trademark or service mark and secondly that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights.
...Many UDRP decisions have found that a disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a complainant’s trademark where the disputed domain name incorporates the complainant’s trademark in its entirety. ...
2013-10-30 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns rights in the O2 trademark. There are many UDRP decisions that find that the pairing of a distinctive trademark with less distinctive terms is confusingly similar to the distinctive trademark. ...D2001-0032 ( and confusingly similar to LEXUS). Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Domain Name, which pairs the O2 trademark with “tele,” an abbreviation for “telecommunications,” the Complainant’s industry, is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s O2 trademark.
...
2011-06-03 - Case Details
The Complainant maintains that by reputation and statutory recognition it is entitled to protection with the right to prevent any use of the well-known trademark or a confusingly similar representation of it in connection with any products or services, even beyond those classes for which it has been formally registered.
...Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The use of the Complainant’s world renowned mark LEGO as the initial four characters of the disputed domain name makes the disputed domain name confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. ...
2011-09-09 - Case Details
Relish Enterprises,
WIPO Case No. D2007-1629.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns rights in the PLAVIX trademark. There are many UDRP decisions that find that the pairing of a distinctive trademark with less distinctive terms is confusingly similar to the distinctive trademark. ...D2001-0032 (finding and confusingly similar to LEXUS). In this case, pairing the Complainant’s PLAVIX trademark with the words “canadian” or “no prescription” does not tend to reduce confusion.1 Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Domain Names are confusingly similar to the Complainant’s PLAVIX trademark.
...
2011-07-13 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered trademark for the word “Premier” which the Complainant uses in marketing its bank card. ...D2008-0923 “wrapping a well-known mark with merely descriptive or generic words is a doomed recipe for escaping a conclusion that the domain name is confusingly similar to the well-known mark”.
That decision was one of many decided under the Policy, which establish the principle that the addition of words or letters to a mark used in a domain name does not alter the fact that the domain name is confusingly similar to the trademark.
...
2011-02-02 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainants have demonstrated that they own rights in the DR. MARTENS trademark. ...D2001-0032 (inter alia, and confusingly similar to LEXUS). Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Domain Name, which pairs the DR. MARTENS trademark with the word “the” and two hyphens, is confusingly similar to the Complainants’ DR. ...
2012-05-09 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainants have demonstrated that they own rights in the DR. MARTENS trademark. ...D2001-0032 (inter alia and confusingly similar to LEXUS). Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Domain Name, which pairs the DR. MARTENS trademark with the word “sale” is confusingly similar to the Complainants’ DR. ...
2012-05-09 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns rights in the SERTA trademark. There are many UDRP decisions that find that the pairing of a distinctive trademark with less distinctive terms is confusingly similar to the distinctive trademark. ...D2001-0032 ( and confusingly similar to LEXUS).
Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Domain Name, which pairs the distinctive SERTA trademark with the less distinctive term “living rooms”, is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s SERTA trademark.
...
2013-03-01 - Case Details
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s WORLDPAY trademark except for the addition of a hyphen between the words “world” and “pay”. ...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant owns registered trademark rights in the trademark WORLDPAY by virtue of European Community Trademark Registration No. 10315646, U.S. ...
2014-03-31 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered trademarks.
Rights and Legitimate interests
The Complainant submits that the Respondent does not have any legitimate rights or interests in the disputed domain name . ...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant does have registered trademark rights in the mark INTACT INSURANCE by virtue of its Canadian Trademark Registration Nos. ...
2012-11-14 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
To satisfy the first UDRP element, a domain name must be “identical or confusingly similar” to a trademark, in which a complainant has rights. The record confirms that the Complainant owns the registered trademark MONDOMIX, so the Complainant proved that it has rights in the trademark.
The Panel finds that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s MONDOMIX trademark because it fully incorporates the MONDOMIX trademark. ...
2015-04-14 - Case Details
It also notes that numerous UDRP panels have found that a disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a trademark in those circumstances and that the addition of the generic numbers “88” does not serve to distinguish the Disputed Domain Name. ...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel accepts that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark MARLBORO in which the Complainant has rights. ...
2015-03-13 - Case Details
Respondent
Respondent did not reply to Complainant’s contentions in this proceeding.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
This Panel must first determine whether is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights in accordance with paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy. ...This Panel therefore finds that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which Complainant has rights in accordance with paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...
2010-10-11 - Case Details
D2000-0022 ( and confusingly similar to CHRISTIAN DIOR); Toyota Motor Sales USA v. Rafi Hamid dba ABC Automobile Buyer,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0032 ( and confusingly similar to LEXUS). Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Domain Name, which pairs the P90X PLUS trademark with the less distinctive term “workout,” is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s P90X PLUS trademark.
...
2010-10-28 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The domain name in issue in this case is .
The Complainant has to prove that the domain name is identical to or confusingly
similar to a mark in which the Complainant has rights. ...Notwithstanding this fact the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to
those trademarks in which the Complainant does have rights. The only difference
between the Complainant’s trademark SOUTHWEST AIRLINES and the domain
name is the generic word ‘vacations’ and the addition of the generic
‘.com’ domain. ...
2004-11-30 - Case Details
D2000-0249, the Administrative Panel equated the phrase "confusingly similar" with "various tests in trademark law of whether the use of a mark is likely to deceive or cause confusion." ...As a leading court has noted, the language " ‘confusingly similar’ is a different standard from the ‘likelihood of confusion’ standard of trademark infringement… ." ...
2000-12-05 - Case Details
A. The Domain Names are Confusingly Similar to Complainant’s Mark
Complainant has established rights in the mark MYOBLOC by virtue of its use
of the mark in commerce since December 2000. ...The
Domain Names, which consist of the close misspelling "myoblock," are
confusingly similar to the MYOBLOC mark. See, e.g., Alta Vista Co. v. Yomtobian,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0937 (October 13,
2000) (the domain names and are confusingly
similar to trademark ALTA VISTA); Oxygen Media, LLC v. ...
2001-08-02 - Case Details
The domain name need only be confusingly similar to a mark held by Complainant.
Two lines of authority provide support for the finding by this Panel that the
domain name is confusingly similar to WAL-MART.
...D2000-0580.
The domain name is held by the Panel to be confusingly similar to the trademarks
of the Complainant. The Complainant has thus met the burden of proof as established
by subparagraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...
2003-10-24 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Complainant states that it has been using the DIEBOLD mark since 1859, and is the owner of 5 U.S. and 245 international trademark registrations for DIEBOLD. ...Forum, January 11, 2002), finding the addition of the generic word "sex" to the GOOGLE mark in a domain name was confusingly similar to Complainant’s mark.
Accordingly, the Panel finds that Respondent’s domain names , , and are confusingly similar to Complainant’s DIEBOLD mark, and that Policy paragraph 4(a)(i) has been satisfied.
...
2003-07-17 - Case Details
This still clearly leaves the disputed domain name confusingly similar to Ms. Van Susteren’s name.
The Complainant further contends that, through appearing on the Complainant’s television program, Ms. ...D2000-1415 (January 23, 2001), where the disputed domain
name, , was found to have been deliberately misspelled
and to be confusingly similar nonetheless to the famous actress’s name; and
see Julia Fiona Roberts v. Russell Boyd, WIPO
Case No. ...
2003-07-07 - Case Details