A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns rights in the O2 trademark. There are many UDRP decisions that find that the pairing of a distinctive trademark with less distinctive terms is confusingly similar to the distinctive trademark. ...D2001-0032 ( and confusingly similar to LEXUS). Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Domain Name, which pairs the O2 trademark with “tele,” an abbreviation for “telecommunications,” the Complainant’s industry, is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s O2 trademark.
...
2011-06-03 - Case Details
Relish Enterprises,
WIPO Case No. D2007-1629.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns rights in the PLAVIX trademark. There are many UDRP decisions that find that the pairing of a distinctive trademark with less distinctive terms is confusingly similar to the distinctive trademark. ...D2001-0032 (finding and confusingly similar to LEXUS). In this case, pairing the Complainant’s PLAVIX trademark with the words “canadian” or “no prescription” does not tend to reduce confusion.1 Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Domain Names are confusingly similar to the Complainant’s PLAVIX trademark.
...
2011-07-13 - Case Details
The Complainant maintains that by reputation and statutory recognition it is entitled to protection with the right to prevent any use of the well-known trademark or a confusingly similar representation of it in connection with any products or services, even beyond those classes for which it has been formally registered.
...Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The use of the Complainant’s world renowned mark LEGO as the initial four characters of the disputed domain name makes the disputed domain name confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. ...
2011-09-09 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainants have demonstrated that they own rights in the DR. MARTENS trademark. ...D2001-0032 (inter alia, and confusingly similar to LEXUS). Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Domain Name, which pairs the DR. MARTENS trademark with the word “the” and two hyphens, is confusingly similar to the Complainants’ DR. ...
2012-05-09 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainants have demonstrated that they own rights in the DR. MARTENS trademark. ...D2001-0032 (inter alia and confusingly similar to LEXUS). Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Domain Name, which pairs the DR. MARTENS trademark with the word “sale” is confusingly similar to the Complainants’ DR. ...
2012-05-09 - Case Details
The Panel is satisfied that the registrant of record for the Domain Name is Respondent and will therefore proceed to analyze whether the three elements of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy are satisfied by Complainant in this proceeding.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Pursuant to paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy, Complainant must first of all establish rights in a trademark or service mark and secondly that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights.
...Many UDRP decisions have found that a disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a complainant’s trademark where the disputed domain name incorporates the complainant’s trademark in its entirety. ...
2013-10-30 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered trademarks.
Rights and Legitimate interests
The Complainant submits that the Respondent does not have any legitimate rights or interests in the disputed domain name . ...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant does have registered trademark rights in the mark INTACT INSURANCE by virtue of its Canadian Trademark Registration Nos. ...
2012-11-14 - Case Details
Respondent
Respondent did not reply to Complainant’s contentions in this proceeding.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
This Panel must first determine whether is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights in accordance with paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy. ...This Panel therefore finds that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which Complainant has rights in accordance with paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...
2010-10-11 - Case Details
D2000-0022 ( and confusingly similar to CHRISTIAN DIOR); Toyota Motor Sales USA v. Rafi Hamid dba ABC Automobile Buyer,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0032 ( and confusingly similar to LEXUS). Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Domain Name, which pairs the P90X PLUS trademark with the less distinctive term “workout,” is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s P90X PLUS trademark.
...
2010-10-28 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered trademark for the word “Premier” which the Complainant uses in marketing its bank card. ...D2008-0923 “wrapping a well-known mark with merely descriptive or generic words is a doomed recipe for escaping a conclusion that the domain name is confusingly similar to the well-known mark”.
That decision was one of many decided under the Policy, which establish the principle that the addition of words or letters to a mark used in a domain name does not alter the fact that the domain name is confusingly similar to the trademark.
...
2011-02-02 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant owns registered trademark rights in the trademark HOLDON by virtue of the trademark registrations listed in paragraph 4 above.
The Panel further finds that the domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainants' registered trademark HOLDON. The disputed domain name consists entirely of the Complainants' trademark HOLDON. ...
2014-05-08 - Case Details
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s WORLDPAY trademark except for the addition of a hyphen between the words “world” and “pay”. ...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant owns registered trademark rights in the trademark WORLDPAY by virtue of European Community Trademark Registration No. 10315646, U.S. ...
2014-03-31 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns rights in the SERTA trademark. There are many UDRP decisions that find that the pairing of a distinctive trademark with less distinctive terms is confusingly similar to the distinctive trademark. ...D2001-0032 ( and confusingly similar to LEXUS).
Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Domain Name, which pairs the distinctive SERTA trademark with the less distinctive term “living rooms”, is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s SERTA trademark.
...
2013-03-01 - Case Details
Michael Robertson, WIPO Case No. D2000-0009).
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel agrees with Complainant’s allegation that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to
Complainant’s CORNING mark.
...The Panel therefore finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s mark and
concludes that the first element of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy is established.
...
2023-11-24 - Case Details
Where a domain name incorporates the entirety of a trade
mark, the domain name will normally be considered confusingly similar to that mark (WIPO Overview of
WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition (“WIPO Overview 3.0”) at section 1.7). ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2023-09-18 - Case Details
The Panel therefore finds that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in
which Complainant has rights in accordance with paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain name incorporates in full Complainant’s SEZANE mark, numerous UDRP panels have agreed that supplementing or modifying a trademark with additional terms does not render a domain name not “identical or confusingly similar” for purpos...
7. ...
2024-02-21 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant makes the following contentions.
Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant first argues that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its trademarks in the extent that the disputed domain name reproduces its trademarks ACCOR and ACCORHOTELS in their entirety, which previous panels have considered to be well-known.
...Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy requires the Complainant to show that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights.
...
2018-09-21 - Case Details
Complainant
Complainant argues that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its BA&SH trademarks. Noting that the sign “&” is not a valid character in a domain name, Complainant states that the addition of the descriptive term “robe” (which means “dress” in French) and of the country code “uk” does not prevent the disputed domain name from being confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademarks.
...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that Complainant has duly shown trademark rights in the BA&SH mark.
...
2020-03-25 - Case Details
All three of these elements have been met in this case.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
This element requires the Panel to consider two issues: first, whether the Complainant has rights in a relevant mark; and, second, whether the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to that mark.
...“Domain names which constitute typo-squatting are confusingly similar by definition; it is this similarity which makes them attractive.” Dell Computer Corp. v. ...
2019-11-27 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The domain name in issue in this case is .
The Complainant has to prove that the domain name is identical to or confusingly
similar to a mark in which the Complainant has rights. ...Notwithstanding this fact the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to
those trademarks in which the Complainant does have rights. The only difference
between the Complainant’s trademark SOUTHWEST AIRLINES and the domain
name is the generic word ‘vacations’ and the addition of the generic
‘.com’ domain. ...
2004-11-30 - Case Details