First, the Complainant contends that the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the
ATMOSPHERA Marks in which the Complainant has rights. The Disputed Domain Name incorporates the
verbal element “atmosphera” of the ATMOSPHERA Marks. ...For the below reasons, support for the Complainant can be found due to the satisfaction of the three conditions for the Disputed Domain Name.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2026-09-04 - Case Details
Prior UDRP panels have already found that domain names combining the Mark with the corporate identifier
“inc” are confusingly similar to Complainant’s mark. See Melaleuca, Inc. v. Donald Morgan, WIPO Case
No. D2026-1103 (finding the domain name confusingly similar to the Mark
notwithstanding the addition of “inc”).
...Complainant
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2026-07-07 - Case Details
Complainant
Firstly, the Complainant asserts that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s
trademarks and trade name as the Disputed Domain Name incorporates the word element “LUMC”, and it is
standard practice of the Panel to conclude that a domain name is confusingly similar to a trademark if that
domain name incorporates the entirety of that trademark.
...Andreas Andreou
Case No. DNL2025-0027
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered or Used in Bad Faith...
2025-09-19 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant’s contentions can be summarized as follows.
The Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the CIVITAS Trademark. It is also confusingly similar to
the Complainant’s name – Civitas Resources. ...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has rights in the CIVITAS trademark. The question of whether the Disputed Domain Name
is confusingly similar to this trademark is less clear than the position in relation to the other trademark relied
upon - the Complainant also says it has unregistered trademark rights in the term CIVITAS RESOURCES.
...
2025-05-13 - Case Details
Therefore, the Panel finds that the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the AQUATALIA service mark. See Missoni S.p.A. v. Rob Mayer,
WIPO Case No. D2012-1250 (finding to be confusingly similar to the MISSONI mark);
and Campagnolo S.r.l. v. ...D2008-1037 (finding to
be confusingly similar to the CAMPAGNOLO mark).
Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Complainant has established that the disputed domain name is
confusingly similar to a service mark in which the Complainant owns rights per Policy paragraph 4(a)(i).
...
2025-04-15 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the F5 Trademark.
The Panel finds the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the F5 Trademark
Previous UDRP panels have consistently held that domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a
trademark for purposes of the Policy “when the domain name includes the trademark, or a confusingly similar
approximation, regardless of the other terms in the domain name” (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. ...Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s
trademark and hence the first condition of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy has been fulfilled.
...
2025-04-25 - Case Details
Therefore, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is
confusingly similar to the AQUATALIA service mark. See Missoni S.p.A. v. Rob Mayer, WIPO Case No.
D2012-1250 (finding to be confusingly similar to the MISSONI mark); and Campagnolo
S.r.l. v. ...D2008-1037 (finding to be confusingly
similar to the CAMPAGNOLO mark).
Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Complainant has established that the disputed domain name is
confusingly similar to a service mark in which the Complainant owns rights per Policy paragraph 4(a)(i).
...
2025-04-23 - Case Details
D2012-1250 (finding to be confusingly similar to the MISSONI mark); and
Campagnolo S.r.l. v. Marzena Zytka, WIPO Case No. D2008-1037 (finding to be
confusingly similar to the CAMPAGNOLO mark).
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2025-04-17 - Case Details
Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its LPL and LPL FINANCIAL
trademarks, as it comprises them in their entirety – in particular the LPL trademark as the leading element of
the disputed domain name – and differing from the LPL FINANCIAL trademark solely by the addition of the
letter “s”. ...Further, according to paragraph 14(b) of the Rules, the Panel may draw such inferences from Respondent’s
failure to submit a Response as it considers appropriate.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel concludes that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the LPL and LPL FINANCIAL
trademarks in which Complainant has rights.
...
2022-10-11 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant owns Australian trademark registrations consisting of or containing the
term “Azure Capital”. ...The registration of a domain name that is identical or confusingly similar to a widely-
known trademark by an unaffiliated entity can by itself create a presumption of bad faith. ...
2022-10-11 - Case Details
The Complainant points to other cases in which panels have found domain names containing a
complainant’s trademark plus the word “consumer” to be confusingly similar to the trademark (see e.g.,
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Ignitee Digital Solutions Pvt. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-09-01 - Case Details
The third element a complainant must establish
is that the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy requires that the Complainant establish that the disputed domain name is
identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-08-25 - Case Details
It is well established that seeking to profit from the sale
of a confusingly similar domain name that incorporates a third party’s trademark demonstrates bad faith.
page 3
Therefore, the Domain Name is registered and used in bad faith.
...The
Panel will have to determine whether the Complainant’s case prima facie meets the requirements of article
2.1 of the Regulations.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Pursuant to article 2.1(a) under I of the Regulations, the Complainant must establish that the Domain Name
is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or trade name in which the Complainant has rights.
...
2022-09-29 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Under paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy, there are two requirements which the Complainant must establish, first
that it has rights in a trademark or service mark, and second that the disputed domain name is identical or
confusingly similar to the trademark or service mark.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-05-23 - Case Details
Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s SOLVAY mark. The disputed domain
name is a typical case of the practice of “typosquatting” which intends to create domain names that are
confusingly similar to the relevant mark by changing or adding letters to a trademark.
...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy requires the Complainant to show that the disputed domain name is identical
or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights. ...
2022-03-29 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the SUPERRARE trademark. Previous
UDRP panels have consistently held that domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark
for purposes of the Policy “when the domain name includes the trademark, or a confusingly similar
approximation, regardless of the other terms in the domain name” (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. ...
2022-05-05 - Case Details
Complainant
The disputed domain names are identical and confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark STUSSY.
As explained below, the Respondent’s use and registration of the disputed domain names is confusingly
similar to the Complainant’s trademark.
...This means that the disputed domain names are confusingly similar with the Complainant’s trademark and
hence the first element of the Policy has been fulfilled.
...
2022-06-01 - Case Details
In accordance with paragraph 14(a) of the Rules, if the Respondent does not submit a Response, in the
absence of exceptional circumstances, the Panel shall decide the dispute based upon the Complaint.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
According to paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy it should be established that the disputed domain name is
identical or confusingly similar to a mark in which the complainant has rights.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-05-27 - Case Details
Further, according to paragraph 14(b) of the Rules, the Panel may draw such inferences from Respondent’s
failure to submit a Response as it considers appropriate.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel concludes that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the ONLYFANS trademark in
which Complainant has rights.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-05-24 - Case Details
Moreover, the Complainant has not authorized the Respondent to use its mark within a confusingly similar
domain name, albeit the Complainant itself does not manufacture or sell TEFLON-branded tape.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2023-03-22 - Case Details