This website is well developed and professionally presented, and includes perhaps a dozen pages of products. The Wayback Machine at <archive.org> indicates similar use since January 2006, shortly after Respondent's registration of the disputed domain name.
...
2010-03-26 - Case Details
The Respondent further submits that sample screen captures from “Archive.org” reflect such use, and claims substantial prior rights in the use of “Rejuve” since 2011, including the fictitious name reservation “Rejuve” used for clinic operations, and prominently displayed on the “www.rejuvewb.com” website.
...The Complainant takes issue with the Respondent’s claim that screenshots captured by the Respondent on “Archive.org” establish continuous use of the “www.rejuvewb.com” website from 2012 to the present. The Complainant argues that the Respondent’s screen captures do not reflect continuous use of the “Rejuve” name, and document nonuse of the “Rejuve” name by the Complainant since as early as August 8, 2018.
...
2020-02-17 - Case Details
Complainant has also provided screen shots of its website at the
domain name that show prominent use of the DORRANCE mark. 1
1The Panel notes that a quick review of the publicly available archival service The Wayback Machine at <archive.org> shows use of the
disputed domain name and the DORRANCE name and mark on Complainant’s website since at least 2000. ...
2026-07-27 - Case Details
På Innehavarens hemsida, ”www.tradgardsteknik.se”, går det numera att se att
bubbelplast säljs under beteckningen ”Duabpower”, men ”https://archive.org/web/” visar att hemsidan nyligen
ändrats och att produkten som numera benämns ”Bubbelplast/Bubbelfolie Duabpower” tidigare endast
page 3
benämndes, på samma sida, som ”BUBBELPLAST/BUBBELFOLIE”. ...
2024-01-22 - Case Details
The disputed domain name was registered on March 24, 2023.
According to the WayBack Machine at Archive.org, as of December 5, 2023, the disputed domain name
resolved to a website in German branded with a yellow “WILDS” logo plus the heading “Wildz Casino AT”.
...
2024-09-23 - Case Details
WIPO Overview 3.0, section
4.8.
In this sense, the Panel visited archive.org and was able to verify that while the Complainant has been using
its website to promote hotel services since 20221, the disputed domain name is not resolving to a website
since its registration.
...
2025-06-10 - Case Details
According to print outs from the Wayback Machine at <archive.org> included in the Complaint, as at January 9, 2018, the disputed domain name resolved to the webhost’s parking page which stated “gerberspareparts.com is bezet”. ...
2020-06-11 - Case Details
A review of historic screen captures of the Complainant’s website “www.mylevapor.com” at Archive.org indicates that the Complainant appears to have offered its goods online since at least December 6, 2017. ...
2021-03-01 - Case Details
The pay-per-click (PPC) links provided at this page included a link to the “Parramatta Eels”, a rugby league club, “Sales”, “restaurant store”, “used cars”, “used car sales” and “Australian”.
Captures by the Wayback Machine at <archive.org> do not show an active website. The Panel notes, however, there was only a single capture in each of 2013, 2014, and 2019, five captures in 2016 and three captures in each of 2017 and 2018.
5. ...
2021-05-28 - Case Details
Nevertheless, the Panel in its discretion under its general powers pursuant to paragraph 10 of the UDRP Rules has reviewed the archived pages for the disputed domain name which are available through the Internet Archive at <archive.org>. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 4.8. The Panel found no evidence that the website at the disputed domain name was actively used between the registration date and the beginning of 2013, respectively after mid-2016. ...
2021-01-06 - Case Details
Because the evidence before the Panel is inconclusive and, in fact, tends to suggest that Respondent may have owned the disputed domain name before Complainant obtained trademark rights in SHL TECHNOLOGIES, the Panel in its discretion under its general powers pursuant to paragraphs 10 and 12 of the UDRP Rules has for the benefit of the Parties reviewed archival website pages for the disputed domain name which are available through the Internet Archive at <archive.org> and archival WhoIs records available through “Domaintools.com”. WIPO Overview 3.0 at section 4.8. ...
2020-12-08 - Case Details
Furthermore, the Panel has conducted its own research, pursuant to its general powers, on the website “archive.org” and found that Complainant appears to have been operating a website at since at least October 18, 2000 and, in addition, from since at least May 2000, from which it was offering a variety of online gambling games. ...
2019-08-23 - Case Details
Reynaldo Urtiaga Escobar
Experto único
Fecha: 11 de abril de 2018
1 Disponibles públicamente en “https://archive.org/”
2 Disponible en https://www.wipo.int/amc/es/processes/process1/report/finalreport.html
3 El borrador de acuerdo está fechado el 5 de noviembre de 2016 en Palma de Mallorca, contiene un clausulado elaborado, tiene múltiples adiciones visiblemente indicadas con control de cambios, refiere fechas y detalles de la relación entre las partes, y propone sujetar a estas últimas a las leyes y tribunales de España, por lo que este Experto estima plausible que dicho documento haya sido preparado por letrados del Promovente, como afirma el Titular....
2018-04-12 - Case Details
In any event, the Panel finds that the Complainant has established common law rights on the trademark BREDEMANN based on the affidavit of the Complainant’s president attached to the Complaint – mentioning the Complainant’s USD 2,000,000 annual investments in advertising in connection with the BREDEMANN branded automotive dealership services since 2000 – and the Archive.org web captures of “www.bredemannfordauto.com” submitted by the Complainant as Annex E, showing that the Complainant used this mark on its website at least as of April 4, 2010, to promote its dealership services of Ford vehicles.
...
2016-05-13 - Case Details
A search of the domain name <123inkt.nl> with the Wayback Machine (<archive.org>), which has documented web pages since the 1990s, shows the web shop’s homepage from various dates in 2008 with “123inkt.nl” in large lettering at the top of the page, in addition to the company name of the Complainant. ...
2018-11-16 - Case Details
A search of the domain name <123inkt.nl> with the Wayback Machine (<archive.org>), which has documented web pages since the 1990s, shows the web shop’s homepage from various dates in 2008 with “123inkt.nl” in large lettering at the top of the page, in addition to the company name of the Complainant. ...
2018-11-16 - Case Details
However, the Respondent argues that it has used the Disputed Domain Name to host various websites since 2001, which is supported by archived snapshots of the Website available at <archive.org>. From these archived pages, it can be seen that the Disputed Domain Name has been used for approximately 10 years to host various websites offering information technology and multimedia-related service to the public on behalf of Neogyn Software Consulting Pvt. ...
2011-08-26 - Case Details
The other extracts relating to the same website provided by the Complainants (using <archive.org>) all date from 2009 and 2010.
The Complainants state “Details of Company and Business names are set out in Annex 7 attached”. ...
2012-12-27 - Case Details
A WHOIS listing shows that SPX Corporation was the administrative contact for the domain name in early 2005.
5.A.3.3 However, from information obtained from <archive.org> it appears that the domain name no longer resolved to the SPX Corporation website after October 2005 but then resolved instead to the website described in paragraphs 5.A.1 and 5.A.2.8 above. ...
2007-10-04 - Case Details
Stanek
Sole Panelist
Dated: May 17, 2010
1 For example, it appears from the Panel's review of archived pages of the web site available on the Internet Archive “Wayback Machine” (available at “archive.org”), that in 2004, the site was active and included the offer for sale of pet care products by the Pet Sense Veterinary Clinic, prior to the 2005 “founding” of its company as well as the subsequent cease and desist letters.
2 For example, Complainant provides no support for the claims that this Respondent or the prior registrant offered to sell the domain name at all, much less for more than out-of-pocket expenses....
2010-05-26 - Case Details