The other extracts relating to the same website provided by the Complainants (using <archive.org>) all date from 2009 and 2010.
The Complainants state “Details of Company and Business names are set out in Annex 7 attached”. ...
2012-12-27 - Case Details
In any event, the Panel finds that the Complainant has established common law rights on the trademark BREDEMANN based on the affidavit of the Complainant’s president attached to the Complaint – mentioning the Complainant’s USD 2,000,000 annual investments in advertising in connection with the BREDEMANN branded automotive dealership services since 2000 – and the Archive.org web captures of “www.bredemannfordauto.com” submitted by the Complainant as Annex E, showing that the Complainant used this mark on its website at least as of April 4, 2010, to promote its dealership services of Ford vehicles.
...
2016-05-13 - Case Details
According to print outs from the Wayback Machine at <archive.org> included in the Complaint, as at January 9, 2018, the disputed domain name resolved to the webhost’s parking page which stated “gerberspareparts.com is bezet”. ...
2020-06-11 - Case Details
A review of historic screen captures of the Complainant’s website “www.mylevapor.com” at Archive.org indicates that the Complainant appears to have offered its goods online since at least December 6, 2017. ...
2021-03-01 - Case Details
Nevertheless, the Panel in its discretion under its general powers pursuant to paragraph 10 of the UDRP Rules has reviewed the archived pages for the disputed domain name which are available through the Internet Archive at <archive.org>. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 4.8. The Panel found no evidence that the website at the disputed domain name was actively used between the registration date and the beginning of 2013, respectively after mid-2016. ...
2021-01-06 - Case Details
Because the evidence before the Panel is inconclusive and, in fact, tends to suggest that Respondent may have owned the disputed domain name before Complainant obtained trademark rights in SHL TECHNOLOGIES, the Panel in its discretion under its general powers pursuant to paragraphs 10 and 12 of the UDRP Rules has for the benefit of the Parties reviewed archival website pages for the disputed domain name which are available through the Internet Archive at <archive.org> and archival WhoIs records available through “Domaintools.com”. WIPO Overview 3.0 at section 4.8. ...
2020-12-08 - Case Details
The pay-per-click (PPC) links provided at this page included a link to the “Parramatta Eels”, a rugby league club, “Sales”, “restaurant store”, “used cars”, “used car sales” and “Australian”.
Captures by the Wayback Machine at <archive.org> do not show an active website. The Panel notes, however, there was only a single capture in each of 2013, 2014, and 2019, five captures in 2016 and three captures in each of 2017 and 2018.
5. ...
2021-05-28 - Case Details
På Innehavarens hemsida, ”www.tradgardsteknik.se”, går det numera att se att
bubbelplast säljs under beteckningen ”Duabpower”, men ”https://archive.org/web/” visar att hemsidan nyligen
ändrats och att produkten som numera benämns ”Bubbelplast/Bubbelfolie Duabpower” tidigare endast
page 3
benämndes, på samma sida, som ”BUBBELPLAST/BUBBELFOLIE”. ...
2024-01-22 - Case Details
Reynaldo Urtiaga Escobar
Experto único
Fecha: 11 de abril de 2018
1 Disponibles públicamente en “https://archive.org/”
2 Disponible en https://www.wipo.int/amc/es/processes/process1/report/finalreport.html
3 El borrador de acuerdo está fechado el 5 de noviembre de 2016 en Palma de Mallorca, contiene un clausulado elaborado, tiene múltiples adiciones visiblemente indicadas con control de cambios, refiere fechas y detalles de la relación entre las partes, y propone sujetar a estas últimas a las leyes y tribunales de España, por lo que este Experto estima plausible que dicho documento haya sido preparado por letrados del Promovente, como afirma el Titular....
2018-04-12 - Case Details
A search of the domain name <123inkt.nl> with the Wayback Machine (<archive.org>), which has documented web pages since the 1990s, shows the web shop’s homepage from various dates in 2008 with “123inkt.nl” in large lettering at the top of the page, in addition to the company name of the Complainant. ...
2018-11-16 - Case Details
A search of the domain name <123inkt.nl> with the Wayback Machine (<archive.org>), which has documented web pages since the 1990s, shows the web shop’s homepage from various dates in 2008 with “123inkt.nl” in large lettering at the top of the page, in addition to the company name of the Complainant. ...
2018-11-16 - Case Details
Furthermore, the Panel has conducted its own research, pursuant to its general powers, on the website “archive.org” and found that Complainant appears to have been operating a website at since at least October 18, 2000 and, in addition, from since at least May 2000, from which it was offering a variety of online gambling games. ...
2019-08-23 - Case Details
A WHOIS listing shows that SPX Corporation was the administrative contact for the domain name in early 2005.
5.A.3.3 However, from information obtained from <archive.org> it appears that the domain name no longer resolved to the SPX Corporation website after October 2005 but then resolved instead to the website described in paragraphs 5.A.1 and 5.A.2.8 above. ...
2007-10-04 - Case Details
However, the Respondent argues that it has used the Disputed Domain Name to host various websites since 2001, which is supported by archived snapshots of the Website available at <archive.org>. From these archived pages, it can be seen that the Disputed Domain Name has been used for approximately 10 years to host various websites offering information technology and multimedia-related service to the public on behalf of Neogyn Software Consulting Pvt. ...
2011-08-26 - Case Details
Stanek
Sole Panelist
Dated: May 17, 2010
1 For example, it appears from the Panel's review of archived pages of the web site available on the Internet Archive “Wayback Machine” (available at “archive.org”), that in 2004, the site was active and included the offer for sale of pet care products by the Pet Sense Veterinary Clinic, prior to the 2005 “founding” of its company as well as the subsequent cease and desist letters.
2 For example, Complainant provides no support for the claims that this Respondent or the prior registrant offered to sell the domain name at all, much less for more than out-of-pocket expenses....
2010-05-26 - Case Details
The Complainant's further verifications on the Internet Archive website http://archive.org/web/ also highlighted that the disputed domain name was never redirected in the past to any active web site but only to a parking page or to a website without content;
- The disputed domain name could deceive Internet users, including the Complainant's customers, suppliers and partners, and lead them to believe that the site "www.galec.com", to which it resolves, is the Complainant's website and that the website not be functioning, thus harming the activities and image of the Complainant;
- The Complainant took measures in order to find an amicable settlement in this matter without success, since, on January 26, 2016, the representative of the Complainant sent a cease and desist letter to the Respondent to the address indicated in the WhoIs database asking it to assign the disputed domain name back to the Complainant, but its email as well as a subsequent reminder remained unanswered.
...
2016-06-23 - Case Details
These are displayed only as blank boxes in the pages captured by the Wayback Machine at <archive.org> so it is not possible to identify what was being advertised at the time.
The content of the website changed recently. ...
2020-09-24 - Case Details
It reads as follows:
“We very recently became aware that there is a dispute regarding our ownership of the domain
sodexocommunity.com, which is one of many expired domains that we legally purchased and restored using
publicly available information from archive.org. There is no intent to defraud or infringe upon any rights held
by any party. To make this more clear we added, “If you have inadvertently ended up here while doing a
search for Sodexo, go to their current website at: https://us.sodexo.com/home.html” to avoid any hint that we
are attempting to mislead.
...
2023-02-10 - Case Details
As the Parties have submitted little documentary evidence in this proceeding to support their contentions, but have made specific reference to their past relationship and usage of the disputed domain name, the Panel in its discretion under its general powers pursuant to paragraphs 10 and 12 of the UDRP Rules has reviewed the Parties’ respective current websites and has reviewed archival pages from the Wayback Machine (<archive.org>) of Respondent’s website at the disputed domain name. See WIPO Overview 3.0 at section 4.8. The archival pages tend to confirm Respondent’s assertions and show that Respondent since early 2009 was using the disputed domain name with a website that referred to Complainant and its services, featured at various times Complainant’s DIET CENTER logo, and advised that Respondent had become a DIET CENTER franchisee starting in 1988. ...
2018-11-06 - Case Details
The web site linked to the disputed domain name appears to pull content from an archived version of (through <archive.org>) that was once operated by a predecessor of Complainant. The content of such web site also contains broken formatting and broken links.
...
2019-01-10 - Case Details