À propos de la propriété intellectuelle Formation en propriété intellectuelle Respect de la propriété intellectuelle Sensibilisation à la propriété intellectuelle La propriété intellectuelle pour… Propriété intellectuelle et… Propriété intellectuelle et… Information relative aux brevets et à la technologie Information en matière de marques Information en matière de dessins et modèles industriels Information en matière d’indications géographiques Information en matière de protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Lois, traités et jugements dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Ressources relatives à la propriété intellectuelle Rapports sur la propriété intellectuelle Protection des brevets Protection des marques Protection des dessins et modèles industriels Protection des indications géographiques Protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Règlement extrajudiciaire des litiges Solutions opérationnelles à l’intention des offices de propriété intellectuelle Paiement de services de propriété intellectuelle Décisions et négociations Coopération en matière de développement Appui à l’innovation Partenariats public-privé Outils et services en matière d’intelligence artificielle L’Organisation Travailler avec nous Responsabilité Brevets Marques Dessins et modèles industriels Indications géographiques Droit d’auteur Secrets d’affaires Académie de l’OMPI Ateliers et séminaires Application des droits de propriété intellectuelle WIPO ALERT Sensibilisation Journée mondiale de la propriété intellectuelle Magazine de l’OMPI Études de cas et exemples de réussite Actualités dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Prix de l’OMPI Entreprises Universités Peuples autochtones Instances judiciaires Ressources génétiques, savoirs traditionnels et expressions culturelles traditionnelles Économie Égalité des genres Santé mondiale Changement climatique Politique en matière de concurrence Objectifs de développement durable Technologies de pointe Applications mobiles Sport Tourisme PATENTSCOPE Analyse de brevets Classification internationale des brevets Programme ARDI – Recherche pour l’innovation Programme ASPI – Information spécialisée en matière de brevets Base de données mondiale sur les marques Madrid Monitor Base de données Article 6ter Express Classification de Nice Classification de Vienne Base de données mondiale sur les dessins et modèles Bulletin des dessins et modèles internationaux Base de données Hague Express Classification de Locarno Base de données Lisbon Express Base de données mondiale sur les marques relative aux indications géographiques Base de données PLUTO sur les variétés végétales Base de données GENIE Traités administrés par l’OMPI WIPO Lex – lois, traités et jugements en matière de propriété intellectuelle Normes de l’OMPI Statistiques de propriété intellectuelle WIPO Pearl (Terminologie) Publications de l’OMPI Profils nationaux Centre de connaissances de l’OMPI Série de rapports de l’OMPI consacrés aux tendances technologiques Indice mondial de l’innovation Rapport sur la propriété intellectuelle dans le monde PCT – Le système international des brevets ePCT Budapest – Le système international de dépôt des micro-organismes Madrid – Le système international des marques eMadrid Article 6ter (armoiries, drapeaux, emblèmes nationaux) La Haye – Le système international des dessins et modèles industriels eHague Lisbonne – Le système d’enregistrement international des indications géographiques eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Médiation Arbitrage Procédure d’expertise Litiges relatifs aux noms de domaine Accès centralisé aux résultats de la recherche et de l’examen (WIPO CASE) Service d’accès numérique aux documents de priorité (DAS) WIPO Pay Compte courant auprès de l’OMPI Assemblées de l’OMPI Comités permanents Calendrier des réunions WIPO Webcast Documents officiels de l’OMPI Plan d’action de l’OMPI pour le développement Assistance technique Institutions de formation en matière de propriété intellectuelle Mesures d’appui concernant la COVID-19 Stratégies nationales de propriété intellectuelle Assistance en matière d’élaboration des politiques et de formulation de la législation Pôle de coopération Centres d’appui à la technologie et à l’innovation (CATI) Transfert de technologie Programme d’aide aux inventeurs WIPO GREEN Initiative PAT-INFORMED de l’OMPI Consortium pour des livres accessibles L’OMPI pour les créateurs WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Assistant de classification États membres Observateurs Directeur général Activités par unité administrative Bureaux extérieurs Avis de vacance d’emploi Achats Résultats et budget Rapports financiers Audit et supervision
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Lois Traités Jugements Parcourir par ressort juridique

États-Unis d'Amérique

US332

Retour

No Electronic Theft (NET) Act, of December 16, 1997 (Public Law 105-147, 111 Stat. 2678)

Copyright Law Amendments 1909-onward

NO ELECTRONIC THEFT (NET) ACT

 

Public Law 105-147

 

An Act

 

To amend the provisions of titles 17 and 18, United States Code, to provide greater copyright protection by amending criminal copyright infringement provisions, and for other purposes.

 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

 

This Act may be cited as the �No Electronic Theft (NET) Act�.

 

SEC. 2. CRIMINAL INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHTS.

 

(a) Definition of Financial Gain.�Section 101 of title 17, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the undesignated paragraph relating to the term �display�, the following new paragraph:

�The term �financial gain� includes receipt, or expectation of receipt, of anything of value, including the receipt of other copyrighted works.�.

(b) Criminal Offenses.�Section 506(a) of title 17, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

�(a) Criminal Infringement.�Any person who infringes a copyright willfully either�

�(1) for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain, or

�(2) by the reproduction or distribution, including by electronic means, during any 180-day period, of 1 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $1,000, shall be punished as provided under section 2319 of title 18, United States Code. For purposes of this subsection, evidence of reproduction or distribution of a copyrighted work, by itself, shall not be sufficient to establish willful infringement.�.

(c) Limitation on Criminal Proceedings.�Section 507(a) of title 17, United States Code, is amended by striking �three� and inserting �5�.

(d) Criminal Infringement of a Copyright.�Section 2319 of title 18, United States Code, is amended�

(1) in subsection (a), by striking �subsection (b)� and inserting �subsections (b) and (c)�;

(2) in subsection (b)�

(A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking �subsection (a) of this section� and inserting �section 506(a)(1) of title 17�; and

(B) in paragraph (1)�

(i) by inserting �including by electronic means,� after �if the offense consists of the reproduction or distribution,�; and

(ii) by striking �with a retail value of more than $2,500� and inserting �which have a total retail value of more than $2,500�; and

(3) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (e) and inserting after subsection (b) the following:

�(c) Any person who commits an offense under section 506(a)(2) of title 17, United States Code�

�(1) shall be imprisoned not more than 3 years, or fined in the amount set forth in this title, or both, if the offense consists of the reproduction or distribution of 10 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of $2,500 or more;

�(2) shall be imprisoned not more than 6 years, or fined in the amount set forth in this title, or both, if the offense is a second or subsequent offense under paragraph (1); and

�(3) shall be imprisoned not more than 1 year, or fined in the amount set forth in this title, or both, if the offense consists of the reproduction or distribution of 1 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $1,000.

�(d)(1) During preparation of the presentence report pursuant to Rule 32(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, victims of the offense shall be permitted to submit, and the probation officer shall receive, a victim impact statement that identifies the victim of the offense and the extent and scope of the injury and loss suffered by the victim, including the estimated economic impact of the offense on that victim.

�(2) Persons permitted to submit victim impact statements shall include�

�(A) producers and sellers of legitimate works affected by conduct involved in the offense;

�(B) holders of intellectual property rights in such works; and

�(C) the legal representatives of such producers, sellers, and holders.�.

 

(e) Unauthorized Fixation and Trafficking of Live Musical Performances.�Section 2319A of title 18, United States Code, is amended�

(1) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as subsections (e) and (f), respectively; and

(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:

�(d) Victim Impact Statement.�(1) During preparation of the presentence report pursuant to Rule 32(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, victims of the offense shall be permitted to submit, and the probation officer shall receive, a victim impact statement that identifies the victim of the offense and the extent and scope of the injury and loss suffered by the victim, including the estimated economic impact of the offense on that victim.

�(2) Persons permitted to submit victim impact statements shall include�

�(A) producers and sellers of legitimate works affected by conduct involved in the offense;

�(B) holders of intellectual property rights in such works;

and

�(C) the legal representatives of such producers, sellers, and holders.�.

 

(f) Trafficking in Counterfeit Goods or Services.�Section 2320 of title 18, United States Code, is amended�

(1) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as subsections (e) and (f), respectively; and

(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:

�(d)(1) During preparation of the presentence report pursuant to Rule 32(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, victims of the offense shall be permitted to submit, and the probation officer shall receive, a victim impact statement that identifies the victim of the offense and the extent and scope of the injury and loss suffered by the victim, including the estimated economic impact of the offense on that victim.

�(2) Persons permitted to submit victim impact statements shall include�

�(A) producers and sellers of legitimate goods or services affected by conduct involved in the offense;

�(B) holders of intellectual property rights in such goods or services; and

�(C) the legal representatives of such producers, sellers, and holders.�.

 

(g) Directive to Sentencing Commission.�(1) Under the authority of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-473; 98 Stat. 1987) and section 21 of the Sentencing Act of 1987 (Public Law 100-182; 101 Stat. 1271; 18 U.S.C. 994 note) (including the authority to amend the sentencing guidelines and policy statements), the United States Sentencing Commission shall ensure that the applicable guideline range for a defendant convicted of a crime against intellectual property (including offenses set forth at section 506(a) of title 17, United States Code, and sections 2319, 2319A, and 2320 of title 18, United States Code) is sufficiently stringent to deter such a crime and to adequately reflect the additional considerations set forth in paragraph (2) of this subsection.

(2) In implementing paragraph (1), the Sentencing Commission shall ensure that the guidelines provide for consideration of the retail value and quantity of the items with respect to which the crime against intellectual property was committed.

 

SEC. 3. INFRINGEMENT BY UNITED STATES.

 

Section 1498(b) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking �remedy of the owner of such copyright shall be by action� and inserting �action which may be brought for such infringement shall be an action by the copyright owner�.

 

Approved December 16, 1997.

 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY�H.R. 2265:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 105-339 (Comm. on the Judiciary).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 143 (1997):

Nov. 4, considered and passed House.

Nov. 13, considered and passed Senate.