Numerous WIPO UDRP panels have found that a domain name that wholly incorporates a complainant's registered mark may be sufficient to establish confusing similarity for the purposes of the Policy: for example, The Ritz Hotel, Limited v. ...The Complainant has further produced evidence sufficient to show that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name. See Telstra Corporation Ltd. v. Nuclear Marshmallows,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0003: “In light of (i) the fact that the Complainant has not licensed or otherwise permitted the Respondent to use any of its trademarks or to apply for or use any domain name incorporating any of those marks [...] the Administrative Panel finds that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name.”
...
2010-08-13 - Datos del caso
Respondent is Sapa Information Management of Minneapolis, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“the Domain Name”) is registered with Network Solutions, LLC.
3. ...Document Technologies, Inc. v. International Electronic Communications Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0270 (denying transfer of the Domain Name because Complainant failed to prove bad faith registration).
...
2010-03-04 - Datos del caso
Respondent has no rights to or legitimate interests in the Domain Name; and
c. the Domain Name has been registered or is being used in bad faith.
The Panel has taken note of a panel decision rendered under the .eu Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR Rules”) regarding the aforementioned domain name , involving both Complainant and Respondent in the present case (see, Gymworld Inc. and Magformers UK Limited v. ...It is well established that the ccTLD suffix “.nl” may be disregarded in assessing the similarity between the relevant trademark(s) on the one hand, and the disputed domain name on the other hand (see, Caterpillar Inc. v. H. van Zuylen Materieel,
WIPO Case No. DNL2011-0073; Roompot Recreatie Beheer B.V. v. ...
2017-12-28 - Datos del caso
In fact, paragraph 3(c) of the Rules provides that a complaint may relate to more than one domain name provided that the domain names are registered by the same domain name holder. The panel in Speedo Holdings B.V. v. ...Nicholas Clark,
WIPO Case No. D2005-0552 and Farouk Systems, Inc v. QYM,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1572).
The other Domain Name makes references and hyperlinks to the Domain Name .
...
2017-05-22 - Datos del caso
The domain name broker contacted the Complainant asking it to place a competitive bid to buy the disputed domain name. ...See Rba Edipresse, S.L. v. Brendhan Hight / MDNH Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1580.
The Panel notes that the Respondent acquired the disputed domain name by transfer. ...
2021-12-20 - Datos del caso
In other words, it is important to ensure fairness to the parties and the maintenance of an inexpensive and expeditious avenue for resolving domain name disputes. (Whirlpool Corporation, Whirlpool Properties, Inc. v. Hui'erpu (HK) electrical appliance co. ltd.,
WIPO Case No. ...These do not seem to eliminate the identity or at least the similarity between Complainant’s registered trademarks and the disputed domain names.
Previous UDRP panels have consistently held that a domain name may be identical or confusingly similar to a trademark for purposes of the Policy “when the domain name includes the trade mark, or a confusingly similar approximation, regardless of the other terms in the domain name” (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. ...
2013-09-27 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is RAO XIUJUAN, HK-YINXIN, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with eNom, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. The Respondent is not
authorized to use the HOSTELWORLD mark, it is not commonly known by the disputed domain name, it is
not affiliated with the Complainant, and it does not hold any rights in the terms included in the disputed
domain name. ...
2023-01-05 - Datos del caso
Furthermore, the Panel notes that the disputed domain name currently directs to an inactive, error webpage.
In this regard, the Panel finds that holding a domain name passively, without making any use of it, does not
confer any rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name on the Respondent (see in this regard
earlier UDRP decisions such as Bollore SE v. ...The Panel accepts that this means that the Respondent was using the
disputed domain name in bad faith, see in this regard also previous UDRP decisions such as Accenture
Global Services Limited v. ...
2024-04-19 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is 林丽萍 (lin li ping), China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Alibaba Cloud Computing Ltd. d/b/a HiChina
(www.net.cn) (the “Registrar”).
3. ...case=D2017-1463
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
DPDgroup International Services GmbH & Co. KG v. 林丽萍 (lin li ping)
Case No. D2022-3314
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2022-11-17 - Datos del caso
Rexel Developpements SAS v. Zhan Yequn,
WIPO Case No. D2017-0275).
According to section 1.7 of the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition (the "WIPO Overview 3.0") in cases where a domain name incorporates the entirety of a trademark the domain name will normally be considered identical or confusingly similar to that mark for purposes of the Policy.
...The Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name, which could demonstrate its right or legitimate interest (see, e.g. World Natural Bodybuilding Federation, Inc. v. ...
2018-10-05 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Nguyen Van Hieu, Viet Nam.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with Nhan
Hoa Software Company Ltd. ...A reseller or distributor may be making a bona fide offering of goods or services and thus have rights or
legitimate interests in a domain name if its use meets certain requirements, which are described in the
decision Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ...
2024-03-12 - Datos del caso
However, the Complainants argue, it has been long been recognised that “If any one of the tests [under Paragraph 4(b) of the Policy] is satisfied, the Respondent will be found to have registered and used the domain name in bad faith.” (Sydney Markets Limited v. Nick Rakis trading as Shell Information Systems,
WIPO Case No. ...Circumstances that have been taken to indicate bad faith include there being a well-known trademark, no response being made to the complaint, and good faith use of the domain name being inconceivable (see Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows,
WIPO Case No. ...
2013-09-04 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Zhang Ming of Shaoguan, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the "Disputed Domain Name") is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the "Registrar").
3. ...This is especially true where, as here, the descriptive words are associated with the Complainant and its goods or services because "clearance store" following the PHILIPP PLEIN Mark in the Disputed Domain Name infers that the items offered on the website are sold at a discount. See, e.g., Gateway Inc. v. ...
2017-05-15 - Datos del caso
The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Above.com, Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The only difference is the substitution of the letter “v” with the letter “b”. The Panel notes in this regard that the disputed domain name contains a hyphen between its two words, in the same way as the Complainant’s mark;
(c) There is close phonetic similarity between the disputed domain name and the Complainant’s trademark. ...
2012-03-01 - Datos del caso
The Complainant 1 holds valid ALDI trademark registrations. The Domain Name incorporates this trademark
in its entirety. As numerous UDRP panels have held, incorporating a trademark in its entirety is sufficient to
establish that a domain name is identical or confusingly similar to that trademark (see PepsiCo, Inc. v.
...case=D2011-1383
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Aldi GmbH & Co. KG, Aldi Stores Limited v. Rod Pennington
Case No. D2024-0899
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2024-05-03 - Datos del caso
Furthermore, it is generally admitted that the addition of a descriptive word in a domain name along with a protected trademark is not sufficient to avoid a finding of confusing similarity (see eBay Inc. v. ebayMoving / Izik Apo,
WIPO Case No. ...MARTENS and of the Complainants’ web site “www.drmartens.com” when registering the disputed domain name (Heineken Brouwerijen B.V. v. Mark Lott,
WIPO Case No. D2000-1487).
The Respondent uses the disputed domain name to advertise sponsored links. ...
2012-04-10 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Maxime Turloud, France
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Google LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...UDRP panels widely agree that incorporating a trademark into a domain name can be sufficient to establish
that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a registered trademark for purpose of the Policy
(see, e.g., Uniroyal Engineered Products, Inc. v. ...
2023-03-09 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Li Na, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with Name.com,
Inc. ...Registered and Used in Bad Faith
The Complainant must prove on the balance of probabilities both that the Disputed Domain Name was
registered in bad faith and that it is being used in bad faith (see section 4.2 of the WIPO Overview 3.0 and,
for example, Telstra Corporation Limited v. ...
2022-09-01 - Datos del caso
As held in Accor v. Noldc Inc., WIPO Case
No. D2005-0016, the gTLD part of a domain name is not taken into consideration when examining the
identity or similarity between a complainant’s trademark and a disputed domain name.
...The disputed domain name resolves to an inactive website. As held in LEGO Juris A/S v. Djuradj Caranovic,
WIPO Case No. ...
2023-04-04 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Zinaida, Ukraine.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...This is confirmed in earlier Panel decisions, where the mere transposition of two letters does not prevent a confusing similarity between the disputed domain name and the relevant trademark (Schneider Electric S.A. v. Domain Whois Protect Service / Cyber Domain Services Pvt. ...
2021-07-19 - Datos del caso