The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...But even if the products offered for sale under the Domain Name were genuine Belstaff products, the use of the domain name does not amount to a bona fide offering of goods under paragraph 4(c)(i) of the Policy and therefore to a legitimate interest with regard to the Domain Name . ...
2012-06-19 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Isabelle Thomas, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Alibaba.com Singapore E-Commerce
Private Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...D2004-0620 (transferring ); General
Electric Company v. Recruiters, WIPO Case No. D2007-0584 (transferring ).
As a result of the above, the Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is identical to a trademark
in which the Complainant has rights.
...
2024-04-18 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Salim Shaik, Bangladesh.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with
NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...As a result, the Respondent must have had knowledge of the Complainant’s rights at the time of registering
the Disputed Domain Name. The Panel finds that the Respondent’s awareness of the Complainant’s
trademark rights at the time of registration suggests bad faith (see Red Bull GmbH v. ...
2022-11-23 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Lin Ling of Putian, Fujian, China / YinSi BaoHu Yi KaiQi of Beijing, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The Disputed Domain Name is registered with HiChina Zhicheng Technology Ltd. ...In other words, it is important to ensure fairness to the parties and the maintenance of an inexpensive and expeditious avenue for resolving domain name disputes (Whirlpool Corporation, Whirlpool Properties, Inc. v. Hui’erpu (HK) electrical applicance co. ltd.,
WIPO Case No. ...
2015-06-16 - Datos del caso
See ALPITOUR S.p.A. v. Ali Albloushi, NAF Case No. FA 888651 (rejecting the respondent’s contention of rights and legitimate interests in the domain name as the respondent is merely using the domain name to operate a web site containing links to various competing commercial web sites, which is neither a bona fide offering of goods or services pursuant to Policy, paragraph 4(c)(i) nor a legitimate noncommercial or fair use pursuant to Policy, paragraph 4(c)(iii)); see also Meyerson v. ...D2000-1368 (finding that the respondent registered and used the domain name in bad faith where the respondent has used the domain name to promote competing auction sites).
...
2011-05-25 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is 林丽萍 (lin li ping), China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Alibaba Cloud Computing Ltd. d/b/a HiChina
(www.net.cn) (the “Registrar”).
3. ...case=D2017-1463
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
DPDgroup International Services GmbH & Co. KG v. 林丽萍 (lin li ping)
Case No. D2022-3314
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2022-11-17 - Datos del caso
Rexel Developpements SAS v. Zhan Yequn,
WIPO Case No. D2017-0275).
According to section 1.7 of the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition (the "WIPO Overview 3.0") in cases where a domain name incorporates the entirety of a trademark the domain name will normally be considered identical or confusingly similar to that mark for purposes of the Policy.
...The Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name, which could demonstrate its right or legitimate interest (see, e.g. World Natural Bodybuilding Federation, Inc. v. ...
2018-10-05 - Datos del caso
Alessandro Pescetelli ("Respondent").
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name the subject of this Complaint is .
The Registrar is Tucows, Inc. ...On the other hand, in a fan Web site where the fan also tries to make money,
the domain name has been regarded as used in bad faith (see for example Universal
City Studios, Inc. v. David Burns and Adam-12 Dot Com, WIPO Case
No. ...
2002-09-13 - Datos del caso
Furthermore, it is generally admitted that the addition of a descriptive word in a domain name along with a protected trademark is not sufficient to avoid a finding of confusing similarity (see eBay Inc. v. ebayMoving / Izik Apo,
WIPO Case No. ...MARTENS and of the Complainants’ web site “www.drmartens.com” when registering the disputed domain name (Heineken Brouwerijen B.V. v. Mark Lott,
WIPO Case No. D2000-1487).
The Respondent uses the disputed domain name to advertise sponsored links. ...
2012-04-10 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Maxime Turloud, France
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Google LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...UDRP panels widely agree that incorporating a trademark into a domain name can be sufficient to establish
that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a registered trademark for purpose of the Policy
(see, e.g., Uniroyal Engineered Products, Inc. v. ...
2023-03-09 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Li Na, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with Name.com,
Inc. ...Registered and Used in Bad Faith
The Complainant must prove on the balance of probabilities both that the Disputed Domain Name was
registered in bad faith and that it is being used in bad faith (see section 4.2 of the WIPO Overview 3.0 and,
for example, Telstra Corporation Limited v. ...
2022-09-01 - Datos del caso
Respondent is Keith Allan, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Noting these circumstances, the Panel finds that Respondent is seeking to target Complainant’s marks
through the disputed domain name.
In making this finding, the Panel further refers to the decision in Fenix International Limited v. ...
2023-06-30 - Datos del caso
Thus, it is clear that no bona fide or legitimate use of the disputed domain name could be claimed by the
Respondent (see LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure
Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. D2010-0138).
Moreover, the use of the disputed domain name which resolves to a website with a landing page displaying a
myriad of gambling and pornographic content and advertisements cannot constitute a bona fide offering of
goods and services (see Autodesk, Inc. v. ...
2023-04-19 - Datos del caso
In certain instances, where there is a breach of contract to sell a domain
name to the Complainant, this may be evidence of bad faith. See e.g., John
Argento v. Futureconsulting, WIPO Case
No. D2001-1030 (January 26, 2001); and ITH GmbH v. First American,
claim number: FA0008000095346 ("The Respondent’s failure to transfer
the domain name after receiving the money is further evidence of bad faith registration
and use of a domain name.") ...
2002-12-11 - Datos del caso
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Complainant's mark is wholly incorporated in the disputed domain name. This factor, together with the fame of the Complainant's mark, was considered a sufficient basis for a finding under this ground in Google Inc. v. txtcorp,
WIPO Case No. ...
2009-12-16 - Datos del caso
It has long been held that adding a gTLD to a registered trademark does not provide sufficient differentiation for a disputed domain name to be considered distinctive from the dominant element of a complainant's trademark (see Gianfranco Ferre' S.p.A. v. ...Such activity represents bad faith as envisaged by paragraph 4(b)(iv) both in respect to registration and use of the disputed domain name. As stated in National Association of Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc. v. RMG Inc - BUY or LEASE by E-MAIL,
WIPO Case No. ...
2009-05-27 - Datos del caso
Previous panel decisions have recognized that actual knowledge of the Complainant’s trademarks and
activities at the time of the registration of the disputed domain name may be considered an inference of bad
faith. See LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte, WIPO Case No. ...See Sodexo v. Shahzan / PrivacyProtect.org, WIPO Case No. D2013-1308.
The registration and use of the disputed domain name to send scam emails to mislead third parties
constitute evidence of bad faith registration and use.
...
2024-08-23 - Datos del caso
The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Above.com, Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The only difference is the substitution of the letter “v” with the letter “b”. The Panel notes in this regard that the disputed domain name contains a hyphen between its two words, in the same way as the Complainant’s mark;
(c) There is close phonetic similarity between the disputed domain name and the Complainant’s trademark. ...
2012-03-01 - Datos del caso
The Complainant 1 holds valid ALDI trademark registrations. The Domain Name incorporates this trademark
in its entirety. As numerous UDRP panels have held, incorporating a trademark in its entirety is sufficient to
establish that a domain name is identical or confusingly similar to that trademark (see PepsiCo, Inc. v.
...case=D2011-1383
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Aldi GmbH & Co. KG, Aldi Stores Limited v. Rod Pennington
Case No. D2024-0899
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2024-05-03 - Datos del caso
D2020-0036 (finding bad faith where “Respondent used the
Domain Name to create an email address [and] send fraudulent emails to Complainant’s customers”); and
LinkedIn Corporation v. ...case=D2022-4352
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Arista Networks Inc. v. Lucy Chen
Case No. D2022-4791
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2023-02-14 - Datos del caso