However, no settlement was reached between the Parties.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Domain Name consists of the Complainant’s famous GIBSON trade mark (registered, inter alia, as a trade mark in the United States for guitars since 1969) and the gTLD “.sale”.
...
2021-12-22 - Datos del caso
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has established that it has rights in the trademark VIOOH. The test for confusing similarity involves the comparison between the trademark and the Domain Name. ...
2022-01-12 - Datos del caso
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions, and has consequently defaulted in this
proceeding.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The entirety of the Complainant’s mark is reproduced, without modification or addition, by the disputed
domain name; the disputed domain name is thus identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy.
...
2025-09-16 - Datos del caso
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...
2025-09-15 - Datos del caso
Respondent
The Respondent has not submitted any substantive reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has shown rights in respect of a trademark or service mark for the purposes of the Policy.
...
2025-02-25 - Datos del caso
page 3
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...
2025-02-24 - Datos del caso
Discussion and Findings
Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy lists the three elements which Complainant must satisfy with respect to the
disputed domain name:
page 3
(i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which
Complainant has rights;
(ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and
(iii) the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2025-09-23 - Datos del caso
Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Domain Name consists of the Complainant’s IGRAAL mark (which is registered, inter alia, in France for
cashback services since 2014) and the gTLD “.club”.
...
2022-10-27 - Datos del caso
Since the Registrar has confirmed that the language of the registration agreement as used by the registrant
for the disputed domain name is English, the language of the proceedings shall be English.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has submitted sufficient evidence to demonstrate its registered rights in the VEON
trademark.
...
2023-01-11 - Datos del caso
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Based on the available record, the Panel finds the Complainant has shown rights in respect of the trademark
DAFABET for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-01-19 - Datos del caso
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions in time, but in a submission rejects the allegations without providing evidence but a claim that the Complainant never contacted it and never offered to “take over” the disputed domain name and that the disputed domain name stands for “START WATCH & CLICK”, a pending project for which the disputed domain name was to be used.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain name shows the Complainant’s well-known trademark SWATCH as the dominant and distinctive element. ...
2016-12-27 - Datos del caso
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Both disputed domain names combine the well-known trademarks of the large grocery chains ALDI and LIDL, connected by the word “or”. ...
2017-01-19 - Datos del caso
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant's contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant is a well-known provider of kitchen and cleaning equipment and products and is the owner of the AEG trade mark in many countries worldwide, including in Iran where the Respondent is based since 2002.
...
2016-12-16 - Datos del caso
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain name consists of the Complainant’s trademark LLOYDS TSB and the ending “foundations”. ...
2016-08-02 - Datos del caso
The Complainant also registered the domain name on April 13, 2007. The Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's IHG trade mark, as it incorporates the IHG trade mark in its entirety. ...
2016-07-12 - Datos del caso
Considering that both parties evidently understand English, the Panel will issue the decision in English.
6.2. Substantial Issues
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain name consists of the Complainant's trademark CREDIT MUTUEL and the suffix "groupe-", followed by the generic Top-Level Domain ("gTLD") ".com". ...
2016-06-08 - Datos del caso
Complainant
Summarizing its legal contentions, Complainant alleges that (1) the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to Complainant's trademarks, (2) Respondents have no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain names, and (3) the disputed domain names were registered and are being used in bad faith, all in violation of the Policy. ...
2017-07-10 - Datos del caso
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant's contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has established rights in the SILDEHEXAL trademark, which mark is reflected in its entirety in the disputed domain name.
...
2017-11-14 - Datos del caso
Under these circumstances, the Panel finds it proper and fair to render this decision in English.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated with supporting evidence that it holds a trademark registration in the EU TM for IMPLANTCAST which is identical to the disputed domain name.
...
2018-11-30 - Datos del caso
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain name begins with and incorporates the entirety of the Complainant’s trademark. ...
2019-10-16 - Datos del caso