Complainant
Complainant submits that the Domain Name is identical and confusingly similar to its RADO trademarks as it contains the well-known RADO trademark in its entirety.
...Many UDRP decisions have found that a disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a complainant's trademark where the disputed domain name incorporates complainant's trademark in its entirety. ...
2016-09-02 - Datos del caso
Parties' Contentions
5.A. Complainant
Identical or Confusingly Similar
5.A.1 Complainant's asserts rights in the BREGUET trade mark, examples of which are set out in paragraph 4.A.3 above.
5.A.2 Complainant's case is that the disputed domain name incorporates that mark in its entirety with addition of the ".design" Top-Level Domain ("TLD") and, consequently, is identical or confusingly similar to that mark. ...This is because the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant's well-known BREGUET trade mark and is used to divert visitors to the website to which it resolve to third party sites offering competitor products. ...
2016-06-23 - Datos del caso
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
This element consists of two parts: first, does the Complainant have rights in a relevant trademark and, second, is the Disputed Domain Name identical or confusingly similar to that trademark.
...First, the registration of a domain name that is confusingly similar to a registered trademark by an entity that has no relationship to that mark may be sufficient evidence of bad faith registration and use. ...
2016-06-22 - Datos del caso
Therefore, the Domain Name could be considered virtually identical and/or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. The Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name. ...D2014-0269 (transferring , as “.holdings” did not prevent a finding that the domain name was identical or confusingly similar to the ZIONS BANK mark).
Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Complainant has satisfied the first requirement that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered trademark, under paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...
2015-09-15 - Datos del caso
Therefore, the Domain Name could be considered virtually identical and/or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. The Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name. ...D2014-0269 (transferring , as “.holdings” did not prevent a finding that the domain name was identical or confusingly similar to the ZIONS BANK mark).
Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Complainant has satisfied the first requirement that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered trademark, under paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...
2015-09-15 - Datos del caso
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the ALLIANZ trademark, to which the Complainant has rights via its relationship to its parent company. ...Additionally, the Respondent has brought no argument to support the contention that the disputed domain name is not identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights.
Hence, the Panel is of the opinion that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trademark ALLIANZ and therefore concludes that the first requirement under paragraph 4(a) of the Policy is fulfilled.
...
2015-12-07 - Datos del caso
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel agrees that the Complainant has extensively established that it has prior trademark rights in the Mark, which is coined, distinctive, powerful and widely known as recognized in Comerica Bank v. ...For all the reasons above, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Mark and that the Complainant has established the first element of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy.
...
2016-01-07 - Datos del caso
Complainant
According to Complainant, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s registered CLASH OF CLANS mark because the disputed domain name incorporates the distinctive element “CLASH.” ...Respondent
While Respondent sent email inquiries to the Center, Respondent did not reply to Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark CLASH OF CLANS in which Complainant has rights. ...
2018-05-24 - Datos del caso
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
This element consists of two parts: first, does the Complainant have rights in a relevant trademark and, second, is the Disputed Domain Name identical or confusingly similar to that trademark.
...A domain name which contains misspelling of a trademark will be found to be confusingly similar to such trademark where the misspelled trademark, as in the present case, remains the dominant or principal component of the domain name. ...
2018-05-22 - Datos del caso
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
This element consists of two parts: first, does the Complainant have rights in a relevant trademark and, second, is the Disputed Domain Name identical or confusingly similar to that trademark.
...Moreover, the registration of a domain name that is confusingly similar to a well-known registered trademark by an entity that has no relationship to that mark is indicative of bad faith registration and use. ...
2017-07-04 - Datos del caso
Parties' Contentions
A. Complainant
Identical or confusingly similar
The Complainant submits that the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the Trade Mark given that it substantially reproduces the Complainant's Trade Mark in entirety.
...However, the Panel may draw appropriate inferences from the Respondent's default.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy provides that the Complainant must establish that the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the Trade Mark.
...
2017-09-26 - Datos del caso
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant does have registered trademark rights in the mark VERA & JOHN by virtue of its trademark registrations, notably the European Union Trade Mark Registration No. 009453333 dated February 2, 2011.
...The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered trademark VERA & JOHN, as the disputed domain name replicates the entirety of the Complainant’s registered mark except for the “&” symbol. ...
2018-07-26 - Datos del caso
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
To satisfy paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy, Complainant must show that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights.
...A domain name which contains a common or obvious misspelling of a trademark is confusingly similar to the mark where the misspelled trademark remains the dominant or principal component of the domain name. ...
2017-03-31 - Datos del caso
Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name and the trademark NB Ι AZ are identical or confusingly similar. ...The Panel will render its decision in English.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain name is other than the generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) “.xyz” confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark NB Ι AZ. ...
2016-05-12 - Datos del caso
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant must demonstrate that it has rights in a trademark and, if so, the Domain Name must be shown to be identical or confusingly similar to the aforementioned trademark.
...Thus, the Panel finds that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Trademark.
For all the foregoing reasons, the Panel is satisfied that the first element of the Policy is met.
...
2019-08-19 - Datos del caso
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Domain Name contains the Complainant’s trademark FB in its entirety and a misspelling of the Complainant’s other trademark FACEBOOK.
The Panel concludes that there is an obvious misspelling of the Complainant’s FACEBOOK trademark and the Panel is of the opinion that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s FACEBOOK trademark. The Panel also concludes that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s FACEBOOK trademark, as it is clearly recognizable in the Domain Name.
...
2019-09-13 - Datos del caso
The third element a complainant must establish is that the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy requires that the Complainant establish that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights. ...As the disputed domain name includes the Complainant’s trademark in its entirety combined with descriptive terms, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark.
Accordingly, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark and hence the first element of the Policy has been fulfilled.
...
2020-12-22 - Datos del caso
To satisfy the test, the trademark to which the domain name is said to be confusingly similar would generally need to be recognizable as such within the domain name. The addition of common, dictionary, descriptive, or negative terms are usually regarded as insufficient to prevent confusing similarity. ...The only real issue therefore is whether the addition of “Iran” renders the Domain Name something other than confusingly similar to the Complainant’s XEROX trademark. Clearly, it does not.
The Panel finds that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the XEROX trademark for the purposes of the Policy and thus paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy has been established.
...
2018-02-07 - Datos del caso
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Complainant has established that it owns prior rights in the HAEMONETICS trademark and that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s HAEMONETICS trademark.
...A domain name which consists of a common, obvious, or intentional misspelling of another’s trademark is considered to be confusingly similar to the relevant trademark for purposes of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy. See, Wachovia Corporation v. ...
2018-01-25 - Datos del caso
The disputed domain names , , and are confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark VALIUM in that each of them incorporates this mark in its entirety (See Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. ...D2002-0775 finding “this conduct, commonly referred to as ‘typo squatting,’ creates a virtually identical and/or confusingly similar mark to the Complainant’s trademark to the Respondent’s websites associated with the purposely misspelled domain names in dispute.”
...
2012-10-15 - Datos del caso