Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
1
ACT XI OF 1997 ON THE PROTECTION OF
TRADE MARKS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS
In order to promote the development of Hungarian market economy, to improve
competition conditions based on the use of signs capable of distinguishing goods and services, to
assist public in gathering information, and in conformity with the international and European
Community law obligations of Hungary concerning the protection of intellectual property, the
Parliament enacts the following Act on the Protection of Trade Marks and Geographical
Indications:
PART I
PROTECTION OF TRADE MARKS
Chapter I
SUBJECT MATTER OF TRADE MARK PROTECTION
Signs capable of distinction
Article 1
(1) Trade mark protection shall be granted for any signs capable of being represented
graphically provided that these are capable of distinguishing goods or services from those of other
undertakings.
(2) Signs which may be granted trade mark protection are in particular:
(a) words, combination of words, including personal names and slogans,
(b) letters, numerals,
(c) figures, pictures,
(d) two- or three-dimensional forms, including the shape of goods or of their packaging,
(e) colours, combination of colours, light signals, holograms,
(f) sound signals, and
(g) combination of signs under (a) to (f).
Absolute grounds for refusal
Article 2
(1) A sign may not be granted trade mark protection if it does not meet the requirements of
Article 1.
(2) A sign shall be excluded from trade mark protection if:
(a) it is devoid of any distinctive character, in particular if it consists exclusively of signs or
indications which may serve, in trade, to designate the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose,
value, geographical origin or the time of production of the goods or of rendering of the service, or
other characteristics of the goods or services, or which have become customary in the current
language or in the practices of trade;
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
2
(b) it consists exclusively of a shape which results from the nature of the goods themselves
or which is necessary to obtain a technical result or which gives substantial value to the goods.
(3) A sign shall not be excluded from trade mark protection in accordance with paragraph
(2)(a) if, either before or after the date of priority, it has acquired a distinctive character in
consequence of the use which has been made of it.
Article 3
(1) A sign may not be granted trade mark protection if:
(a) it is contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality;
(b) it is liable to deceive public as to the nature, quality, geographical origin or other
characteristics of the goods or services;
(c) its registration was applied for in bad faith.
(2) A sign shall be excluded from trade mark protection if:
(a) it consists of, or contains any of the emblems listed in Article 6 ter
(1) of the Paris
Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, provided that
(aa) such a sign – if it is not a national flag – has been communicated according to Article
6 ter
(3) and;
(ab) the sign – if it consists of or contains an official sign indicating control and warranty or
a hallmark – its registration was applied not in respect of identical or similar goods as indicated
with the official sign,
(b) it consists of badges, symbols or escutcheons, not covered by point(a), which are of
public interest, or if it contains such badges, symbols or escutcheons;
(c) it consists exclusively of symbols having a close relation to religious or other beliefs.
(3) Trade mark protection shall be granted with the consent of the competent authority to
signs which consist of or contain the emblems defined under paragraph 2(a) and (b).
(4) A sign may not be granted trade mark protection if it consists of or contains a
geographical indication registered pursuant to this Act or to the law of the European Union. This
provision shall apply to signs
(a) which shall not be registered as trade marks pursuant to the law of the European Union;
(b) which are used in connection with goods
(ba) which do not originate in a geographical area corresponding to the geographical
indication or
(bb) to which the geographical indication shall not be used for any other reason on the
basis of the provisions of this Act or of the law of the European Union.
Relative grounds for refusal
Article 4
(1) A sign may not be granted trade mark protection:
(a) with respect to identical goods or services, if the sign with the later date of priority is
identical with an earlier trade mark;
(b) if because of its identity with or similarity to the earlier trade mark and the identity or
similarity of the goods or services there exists a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public;
(c) with respect to dissimilar goods or services if the sign with the later date of priority is
identical with or similar to an earlier trade mark having a reputation in the country where the use
without due cause of the later sign would take unfair advantage of or be detrimental to the
distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark.
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
3
(2) “Earlier trade mark” means a trade mark whose registration was applied for with an
earlier date of priority or – for the purposes of paragraph (1)(a) and (b) – a sign which has become
well-known at an earlier date in the country under the Paris Convention for the Protection of
Industrial Property even if that sign is not registered. “Earlier trade mark” shall also mean –
depending on the registration of the sign – an earlier trade mark application.
(3) A sign may not be refused trade mark protection if it conflicts with an earlier trade mark,
which has not been used by the holder in accordance with the provisions of Article 18.
(4) For the purposes of this Act, the likelihood of confusion includes the likelihood of
association with the earlier trade mark.
Article 5
(1) A sign may not be granted trade mark protection:
(a) if it would infringe earlier personal rights of others, in particular a right in a name or of
personal portrayal;
(b) if it would conflict with an earlier copyright or industrial property right of others,
including conflict with the name of a protected plant variety.
(2) A sign shall not be granted trade mark protection
(a) if it has been earlier used effectively in the country without registration where the use of
the sign without the consent of the prior user would be contrary to law; and
(b) if, with respect to identical or similar goods or services, it is identical with or similar to a
trade mark whose protection has lapsed by reason of expiration and less than two years have
elapsed since the lapse, unless the earlier trade mark had not been used in conformity with the
provisions of Article 18.
(3) In determining whether a right, use or expiration is deemed as earlier within the meaning
of paragraphs (1) and (2), the priority of the application for registration shall be taken into account.
Article 6
A sign shall be excluded from trade mark protection if the representative or agent applies
for registration in his own name without the holder’s authorization, unless the representative or
agent justifies his action.
Declaration of consent
Article 7
(1) A sign may not be refused trade mark protection in accordance with Articles 4 and 5 if
the holder of the earlier right consents to the registration of the later sign.
(2) A declaration of consent shall be valid if drawn up as an official document or a private
document providing sufficient evidence.
(3) [repealed]
Registrability
Article 8
(1) Trade mark protection shall be granted for a sign if
(a) it satisfies the requirements of Article 1 and is not excluded from trade mark protection
under the terms of Articles 2 to 7 and
(b) the relevant application complies with the requirements laid down by this Act.
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
4
Chapter II
RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS CONFERRED BY TRADE MARK PROTECTION
Right to trade mark protection
Article 9
(1) The right to the legal protection of a trade mark (hereinafter referred to as "trade mark
protection") shall belong to the person who has made the trade mark registered according to the
procedure prescribed by this Act.
(2) Any natural or legal person or a company without legal personality, irrespective of
pursuing economic activities, may apply for trade mark protection.
(3) If two or more persons apply for registration jointly, trade mark protection shall belong
to them jointly. Where two or more persons are entitled to the right, it shall be deemed to belong to
them equally unless otherwise provided.
Establishment of trade mark protection
Article 10
Trade mark protection shall begin with registration and shall be effective retroactively from
the date of filing of the application.
Term of trade mark protection
Article 11
(1) Trade mark protection shall have a term of 10 years beginning on the date of filing of the
application.
(2) Trade mark protection shall be renewed for further periods of 10 years. In case of
renewal, the new period of protection shall begin on the day following the date of expiration of the
previous period.
Rights conferred by trade mark protection
Article 12
(1) Trade mark protection shall confer on its holder the exclusive right to use the trade
mark.
(2) On the basis of the exclusive right of use, the holder shall be entitled to prevent any
person not having his consent from using in the course of trade:
(a) any sign identical with the trade mark in relation to goods or services which are identical
with those for which the trade mark is registered;
(b) any sign where, because of its identity with or similarity to the trade mark and the
identity or similarity of the goods or services, there exists a likelihood of confusion on the part of
the public; or
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
5
(c) any sign which is identical with or similar to the trade mark in relation to goods and
services which are not identical with or not similar to those for which the trade mark is registered,
provided that the trade mark has a reputation in the country and the use of that sign without due
cause would take unfair advantage of, or would be detrimental to, the distinctive character or the
repute of the trade mark.
(3) The following, in particular, shall be prohibited under paragraph (2):
(a) affixing the sign to the goods or to the packaging thereof;
(b) putting on the market or offering for sale the goods under that sign or stocking them for
such purposes;
(c) offering or supplying services under that sign;
(d) importing or exporting the goods under the sign;
(e) using the sign in business correspondence and in advertising.
Reproduction of trade marks in reference works
Article 13
If the reproduction of a trade mark in a dictionary, lexicon, encyclopaedia or similar
reference work gives the impression that it constitutes the generic name of the goods or services for
which the trade mark is registered, the publisher of the work shall, at the request of the holder of
the trade mark, indicate – in the next edition of the publication at the latest – that the trade mark has
been registered and is under trade mark protection.
Unlawful use of a trade mark by an agent or representative
Article 14
Where a trade mark is registered in the name of the agent or representative without the
holder's authorization, the holder shall be entitled to oppose the unauthorized use of his trade mark
by his agent or representative, unless the agent or the representative justifies his action.
Limitations of trade mark protection
Article 15
(1) Trade mark protection shall not entitle the holder to prohibit a third party from using in
the course of trade and in accordance with the requirements of fair trade practice,
(a) his own name or address;
(b) indications concerning the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose, value, geographical
origin, the time of production of the goods or of rendering of the service, or other characteristics of
the goods or service;
(c) the trade mark where it is necessary to indicate the intended purpose of the goods or
services, in particular in the case of accessories or spare parts.
(2) [repealed]
Exhaustion of the rights conferred by trade mark protection
Article 16
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
6
(1) Trade mark protection shall not entitle the holder to prohibit the use of the trade mark in
relation to goods which have been put on the market in the European Economic Area by him or
with his expressed consent.
(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply where the holder has legitimate reasons to oppose further
commercialisation of the goods, in particular where the condition of the goods has been changed or
impaired.
Acquiescence
Article 17
(1) Where the holder has acquiesced, for a period of five successive years, in the use of a
later trade mark in the country while being aware of such use, he shall no longer be entitled either
to oppose the use of the later trade mark in the country or to request, on the basis of his earlier trade
mark, the cancellation thereof [Article 33(2)(b)].
(2) Paragraph (1) shall only apply to goods or services in relation to which the later trade
mark was put in genuine use.
(3) Paragraph (1) shall not apply where the later trade mark was applied for in bad faith.
(4) The holder of a later trade mark shall not be entitled to oppose the use of the earlier trade
mark, even though the holder of the earlier trade mark may no longer oppose, on the basis of
paragraph (1), the use of the later trade mark.
(5) The provisions of paragraphs (1) to (4) shall apply mutatis mutandis to earlier trade
marks having a reputation, to trade marks that have become well-known in the country at an earlier
date, as well as to earlier rights referred to in Article 5(1) and (2)(a).
Failure to use of trade marks
Article 18
(1) If, within a period of five years following the date of registration, the holder has not
commenced genuine use of the trade mark in the country in connection with the goods or services
for which it is registered, or if such use has been suspended during an uninterrupted period of five
years, trade mark protection shall be subject to the legal consequences provided for in this Act
[Article 4(3); Article 5(2)(b); Article 30(d); Article 33(2)(a); Article 34; Article 61/E; Article
73(2)], unless the holder duly justifies non-use.
(2) For the purposes of paragraph (1), the following shall also constitute genuine use of the
trade mark in the country:
(a) use of the trade mark in a form differing from the registered form only in elements
which do not alter the distinctive character;
(b) affixing of the trade mark to goods or to the packaging thereof in the territory of the
country solely for export purposes.
(3) For the purposes of paragraph (1), use of the trade mark with the authorization of the
holder shall be deemed to constitute use by the holder.
Chapter III
TRADE MARKS AND TRADE MARK PROTECTION AS OBJECTS OF PROPERTY
Succession in title
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
7
Article 19
(1) Rights deriving from a trade mark and from trade mark protection may be transferred
and assigned.
(2) The successor in title to a legal person or to a company without legal personality shall
also acquire the trade mark, unless otherwise provided by the parties or the circumstances clearly
dictate otherwise.
(3) Trade mark protection may be assigned by contract. Trade mark protection may also be
assigned in respect of some of the goods or services for which the trade mark is registered.
(4) The contract for the assignment of trade mark protection shall be null and void where the
assignment is likely to mislead the public.
(5) Where a trade mark is applied for or is registered in the name of the agent or
representative without the holder's authorization, the latter shall be entitled to demand the
assignment in his favour of the right to trade mark protection or of the registration, unless the agent
or the representative justifies his action.
Pledge
Article 20
Rights deriving from a trade mark and from trade mark protection may be pledged. A right
of pledge shall only be constituted if the mortgage contract is made in writing and the right of
pledge is entered in the Trade Mark Register.
Joint right to trade mark protection and joint trade mark protection
Article 21
(1) Where there are two or more holders of the same trade mark, each of the joint holders
may exercise the rights conferred by trade mark protection over his own share. Where one joint
holder wishes to dispose of his share, the other joint holders shall enjoy a right of preemption with
respect to third parties.
(2) The trade mark may be used by any one of the joint holders alone; however, he shall be
obliged to pay appropriate remuneration to the other joint holders, in proportion to their shares. For
the purposes of Article 18, such use of the trade mark shall be deemed to constitute use by all of the
holders.
(3) A license for the use of a trade mark may only be granted to a third party jointly by the
joint holders. Collective consent may be replaced by a court judgement under the general
provisions of civil law.
(4) In the event of doubt, the shares of all joint holders shall be deemed equal. If one of the
joint holders surrenders his trade mark protection, the rights of the other joint holders shall extend
to his share, in proportion to their own shares.
(5) Any one of the joint holders may also act individually to renew, enforce and protect
trade mark rights. His legal acts - settlement, admission of claims and waiver of rights excepted -
shall be binding on any other joint holder who has failed to observe a time limit or to perform a
required act, provided that such other joint holder has not subsequently remedied his omission.
(6) Where the acts of the joint holders are divergent, a decision shall be taken having regard
to all other relevant facts in the procedure.
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
8
(7) Costs relating to joint trade mark protection shall be borne by the joint holders in
proportion to their shares. If, despite being notified, a joint holder does not pay the costs for which
he is liable, the joint holder who has paid those costs may claim assignment to him of the share
belonging to the joint holder having not met his obligations.
(8) The provisions concerning joint trade mark protection shall apply mutatis mutandis to
joint trade mark applications.
Application of the provisions of the Civil Code
Article 22
[repealed]
Chapter IV
TRADE MARK LICENSE CONTRACTS
Conclusion of trade mark license contracts
Article 23
(1) Under a trade mark license contract, the holder of trade mark protection licenses the
right to use a trade mark and the licensee is required to pay royalties.
(2) The parties shall be free to determine the contents of the license contract. However, any
license contract whose fulfilment is likely to mislead the public shall be null and void.
Rights and obligations of the parties
Article 24
(1) The holder shall guarantee for the whole duration of the license contract that no third
parties hold rights in the trade mark preventing or limiting exercise of the right of use. This
guarantee shall be subject to the rules applicable to a vendor who transfers proprietary rights,
except that the licensee may, instead of cancellation, terminate the contract with immediate effect.
(2) The holder shall inform the licensee of any third party rights in relation to the trade mark
and of any other important circumstances. However, he shall be obliged to transfer economic,
technical and organizational know-how only if this has been expressly agreed.
(3) The holder may control the licensee as to the quality of the goods bearing the trade mark
or of the services supplied under the trade mark.
(4) The license contract shall cover all goods and services for which the trade mark is
registered and every mode of use, to any extent whatsoever, without limitation in time or as to
territory.
(5) A right of use shall be exclusive only if expressly stipulated by contract. In the case of
an exclusive license, the holder may also use the trade mark in addition to the licensee who has
acquired the right of use, unless expressly excluded by contract. The holder may terminate the
exclusivity of a license, subject to a proportional reduction in the royalty, if the licensee does not
begin use of the trade mark within a reasonable period of time under the given circumstances.
(6) The licensee may transfer the license or grant sub-licences to third parties only with the
express consent of the holder.
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
9
Termination of license contracts
Article 25
The license contract shall terminate ex nunc when the contractual period expires or when
certain specified circumstances occur or when the trade mark protection expires.
Effect of provisions relating to license contracts
Article 26
(1) The parties may derogate by mutual consent from the provisions relating to license
contracts where not prohibited by law.
(2) [repealed]
Chapter V
INFRINGEMENT
Trade mark infringement
Article 27
(1) Any person who unlawfully uses a trade mark in contravention of the provisions of
Article 12, commits trade mark infringement.
(2) The holder may, according to the circumstances of the case, have recourse to the
following civil remedies:
(a) he may request that the fact of infringement be declared by the court;
(b) he may request an injunction that the infringer cease his infringement or any acts
directly threatening with it;
(c) he may demand that the infringer give information on the identity of persons involved in
the production and distribution of the infringing goods or the provision of infringing services and of
their channels of distribution;
(d) he may demand satisfaction from the infringer by way of a declaration or by other
appropriate means; if necessary, the declaration shall be made public by the infringer or at his
expense;
(e) he may require surrender of the enrichment obtained by the infringement of the trade
mark;
(f) he may request the seizure, the transfer to a specific person, the recall and the definitive
removal from the channels of commerce, or destruction, of the infringing products and the
packaging thereof, as well as of the means and materials exclusively or principally used for
infringement.
(3) Where a trade mark is infringed, the holder may also claim damages under the rules of
civil liability.
(4) The holder may submit the claim referred to in paragraph (2)(b) also against any person
whose services were used in the infringing activities.
(5) The holder may submit the claim referred to in paragraph (2)(c) also against any person
who
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
10
(a) was found in possession of the infringing goods on a commercial scale;
(b) was found to be using the infringing services on a commercial scale;
(c) was found to be providing on a commercial scale services used in infringing activities;
(d) was indicated by the person referred to in points (a) to (c) as being involved in the
production or distribution of the infringing goods or the provision of the infringing services.
(6) For the purposes of paragraph (5)(a) to (c), the acts are carried out on a commercial scale
if it is obvious from the nature and quantity of the infringing goods or services that these acts are
carried out for direct or indirect economic or commercial advantage. In the absence of proof to the
contrary, acts carried out by consumers in good faith shall not be regarded as acts carried out on a
commercial scale.
(7) On the basis of paragraph (2)(c) and paragraph (5), the infringer or the person referred to
in paragraph (5) may be required to provide, in particular, the following information:
(a) the names and addresses of the producers, distributors, suppliers and holders of the
infringing goods or services, as well as the intended or involved wholesalers and retailers;
(b) the quantities produced, delivered, received or ordered of the infringing goods or
services, as well as the prices obtained or given for the goods or services in question.
(8) At the request of the holder, the court may rule that the infringing nature of the means,
materials, goods and packaging seized, recalled or definitively removed from the channels of
commerce be removed or, where this is not possible, that they be destroyed. In justified cases, the
court may order, in place of destruction, that the means and materials seized be auctioned according
to the procedure of judicial execution; in such cases, the court shall decide how the sum obtained is
to be used.
(9) Seizure of the means and materials used in infringing activities and of the infringing
goods and packaging shall be admissible even if they are not in the possession of the infringer, but
the holder knew or had reasonable grounds to know about the infringement.
(10) The court shall order the measures referred to in paragraph (2)(f) and paragraph (8) at
the expense of the infringer, except when derogation therefrom is justified by the circumstances of
the particular case. In ordering the recall and the definitive removal from the channels of
commerce, or destruction, the court shall decide by taking into account the interests of third parties
and by ensuring the proportionality of the measures to the seriousness of the infringement.
(11) At the request of the holder, the court may order that its decision be made public at the
expense of the infringer. The court shall decide on the manner of the publicity. Publicity shall
mean, in particular, publication in a national daily newspaper or on the Internet.
Customs law consequences of trade mark infringement
Article 28
Where a trade mark is infringed, the holder may, according to the provisions of specific
legislation, request for action by the customs authorities to prevent infringing goods be put on the
market.
Rights of the applicant and the licensee in the case of trade mark infringement
Article 29
(1) An applicant may also institute proceedings for trade mark infringement; however, the
proceedings shall be suspended until the decision to register the trade mark has become final.
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
11
(2) A licensee recorded in the Trade Mark Register may institute proceedings for trade mark
infringement in his own name if he has invited the holder to take appropriate action in order to stop
the infringement and the holder has failed to take action within 30 days of the invitation.
Chapter VI
LAPSE OF TRADE MARK PROTECTION
Modes of lapse
Article 30
(1) Trade mark protection shall lapse:
(a) when its term expires without renewal (Articles 11 and 31), on the day following the
date of expiration;
(b) if the holder surrenders the protection (Article 32), on the day following the date of
receipt of the surrender or at an earlier date specified by the holder;
(c) if it is cancelled (Article 33), with retroactive effect to the date of filing of the
application;
(d) if the holder has not put the trade mark to genuine use (Articles 18 and 34), with
retroactive effect to the starting date of the procedure for a decision on revocation or to the date of
priority of the conflicting later trade mark, whichever is earlier;
(e) if the trade mark loses its distinctive character or becomes deceptive (Article 35), with
retroactive effect to the starting date of the procedure for a decision on revocation or to the date of
priority of the conflicting later trade mark, whichever is earlier;
(f) in the event of dissolution of the holder legal person or company without legal
personality [Article 9(2)] without a successor in title, with retroactive effect to the date of
dissolution.
(2) Under paragraphs (1)(d) and (1)(e), at the request of either of the parties trade mark
protection may also be revoked with retroactive effect to such an earlier date on which the grounds
for filing the request for revocation occurred provided that the grounds for revocation existed at the
earlier date specified and at the time of filing the request for revocation as well.
Partial lapse by reason of expiration of protection
Article 31
Where trade mark protection is renewed only in respect of some of the goods or services for
which the trade mark has been registered, trade mark protection shall lapse by reason of expiration
of protection in respect of the parts not covered by the renewal.
Surrender of trade mark protection
Article 32
(1) The holder entered in the Trade Mark Register may surrender his trade mark protection
by a written declaration addressed to the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office.
(2) If the surrender affects the rights of third parties deriving from legislation, from rulings
of an authority, from a license contract or from any other contract recorded in the Trade Mark
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
12
Register, or if a lawsuit is recorded in the Trade Mark Register, it shall take effect only with the
consent of the parties concerned.
(3) Surrender may be made in respect of some of the goods or services for which the trade
mark is registered.
(4) Surrender of trade mark protection may not be withdrawn.
Cancellation
Article 33
(1) The trade mark shall be cancelled
(a) if the subject matter of the trade mark protection does not satisfy the requirements laid
down in Article 8(a);
(b) if the subject matter of the trade mark protection differs from, or the list of goods or
services extends beyond, the content of the application as filed at the accorded filing date or – in
the case of division – the content of the divisional application;
(c) if the international trade mark application has been filed by a person not entitled to it
under the Madrid Agreement or the Protocol Relating to the Madrid Agreement [Article 76/I(1)(a)].
(2) The trade mark may not be cancelled
(a) if it conflicts with an earlier trade mark [Article 4(2)] the use of which does not satisfy,
at the time of filing of the request for cancellation, the requirements laid down in Article 18; or
(b) if it conflicts with an earlier trade mark, non-registered sign or any other rights whose
holder was aware of the registration of the later trade mark and has acquiesced, for a period of five
successive years, in the use of that trade mark, unless the holder of the later trade mark acted in bad
faith.
(3) Where the grounds for cancellation exist in respect only of some of the goods or services
for which the trade mark is registered, cancellation shall be pronounced in the form of a
corresponding limitation of the protection.
(4) Should a request for cancellation be refused by a final decision, a new procedure for the
cancellation of the same trade mark on the same grounds may not be instituted by any person.
Revocation by reason of non-use
Article 34
(1) Trade mark protection shall be revoked by reason of non-use in respect of all or some of
the goods or services for which the trade mark is registered, depending on whether non-use exists
in respect of all or some of the goods or services for which the trade mark is registered.
(2) Revocation of trade mark protection by reason of non-use shall not be declared if, during
the interval between expiration of the period laid down in Article 18(1) and filing of the request for
revocation by reason of non-use, the trade mark has been put in genuine use or such use has been
resumed. This provision shall not apply where the commencement or resumption of use within a
period of three months preceding the filing of the request occurs only after the holder becomes
aware that a decision on revocation by reason of non-use will be requested.
(3) Should a request for revocation by reason of non-use be refused by a final decision, a
new procedure for revocation of the same trade mark on the same grounds may not be instituted by
any person.
Revocation by reason of loss of distinctive character or becoming deceptive
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
13
Article 35
(1) Trade mark protection shall be revoked
(a) if, in consequence of acts of the holder, the trade mark has become the common name in
the trade for a product or service for which it is registered; or
(b) if, in consequence of use, the trade mark has become deceptive, particularly as to the
nature, quality or geographical origin of the goods or services.
(2) Trade mark protection shall be revoked by reason of loss of distinctive character or
becoming deceptive in respect of all or some of the goods or services for which the trade mark is
registered, depending on whether the grounds for revocation exist in respect of all or some of the
goods or services for which the trade mark is registered.
(3) Should a request for revocation by reason of loss of distinctive character or becoming
deceptive be refused by a final decision, a new procedure for revocation of the same trade mark on
the same grounds may not be instituted by any person.
Revocation by reason of dissolution of the holder without successor in title
Article 35/A
Should a request for revocation by reason of dissolution of the holder without successor in
title be refused by a final decision, a new procedure for revocation of the same trade mark on the
same grounds may not be instituted by any person.
Reclaiming of royalties
Article 36
If the trade mark protection lapses ex tunc, only the portion of the royalties paid to the
holder that was not covered by the profits derived from the use of the trade mark may be reclaimed.
Chapter VI/A
APPLICATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE CIVIL CODE
Article 36/A
(1) Matters relating to
(a) the transfer, assignment, pledge of rights relating to a trade mark or deriving from trade
mark protection, as well as the joint right to trade mark protection and joint trade mark protection;
(b) the trade mark license contracts; and
(c) other moral and economic issues concerning trade marks
that are not covered by this Act shall be governed by the provisions of the Civil Code.
(2) The declaration of consent under Article 7 may be contested under those provisions of
the Civil Code that concern actions for avoidance of a contract by reason of mistake, deception or
threat; the declaration may not be withdrawn and may not be replaced by the decision of a Court.
PART II
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
14
PROCEDURES BEFORE THE HUNGARIAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE IN
TRADE MARK MATTERS
Chapter VII
GENERAL PROVISIONS GOVERNING TRADE MARK PROCEDURES
Competence of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office
Article 37
(1) The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall have competence in the following trade
mark matters:
(a) registration of trade marks,
(b) renewal of trade mark protection,
(c) revocation of trade mark protection,
(d) cancellation of trade marks,
(e) division of trade mark protection,
(f) keeping the records of trade mark applications and trade marks,
(g) official information.
(2) The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall also have competence in matters
deriving from the application of provisions relating to the Community trade mark system (Chapter
X/A) and to the international registration of trade marks (Chapters X/B to X/D).
Application of the general rules of public administration procedures
Article 38
(1) The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall proceed in trade mark matters falling
within its competence – with the exceptions laid down in this Act – by applying the provisions of
the Public Administration Procedures Act.
(2) In the absence of a provision of legislation to the contrary, the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office shall proceed in trade mark matters within its competence on request.
(3) The provisions of the Public Administration Procedures Act which are related to
notifications and notices – issued ex officio or on request – concerning the start of procedures and
first contact shall not apply in trade mark matters.
(4) The provisions of the Public Administration Procedures Act relating to succession in
title shall not apply in trade mark matters.
(5) The provisions of the Public Administration Procedures Act relating to recourse to a
mediator shall not apply in trade mark matters.
Decisions of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office
Article 39
(1) [repealed]
(2) The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall proceed and take its decisions in
cancellation and revocation procedures at hearings held by a three-member board, except when the
latter procedure is initiated due to the dissolution of the holder of the trade mark without a
successor in title. Where a hearing must be held on an opposition filed against the registration of a
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
15
trade mark in a trade mark registration procedure, a three-member board set up by the Hungarian
Intellectual Property Office shall hold the hearing and take a decision. The board shall take its
decisions by majority.
(3) Decisions of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall take effect on service
unless their review is requested.
(4) Decisions of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall be served by a public
notice if
(a) the address or the registered seat (establishment, branch of establishment) of the party is
unknown, or
(b) the mail is returned with a remark that the whereabouts or the address of the party are
unknown.
(5) The public notice shall be published in the official journal and on the website of the
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office on the same day. Decisions served by a public notice shall
be considered delivered on the fifteenth day after the publication of the notice. In any other matters
pertaining to the service of decisions by a public notice, the provisions of the Public Administration
Procedures Act shall apply except that posting shall mean the publication of the public notice.
(6) Where the provisions of Article 44(1) apply, all decisions shall be delivered to the
representative.
(7) The provisions of the Public Administration Procedures Act related to the publication of
decisions shall not apply in trade mark matters.
Establishment of facts
Article 40
(1) In trade mark procedures before it, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall
examine the facts of its own motion, with the exception set out in paragraph (2), its examination
shall not be restricted to the allegations of the parties.
(2) In trade mark registration procedures, in the subject of opposition filed against the
registration of a sign, in cancellation procedures and in revocation procedures, the Hungarian
Intellectual Property Office shall examine the facts within the framework of the request and on the
basis of the allegations and statements of the parties and the data verified by them.
(3) The decisions of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office may only be based on facts
or evidence on which the parties concerned have had an opportunity to present their comments;
however, facts or evidence not submitted by the party in due time may be left out of consideration.
(3a) In procedures defined in paragraph (2), clients shall file their documents with the
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office with a copy for each opposing party in the procedure plus
one additional copy; if multiple clients have one common representative, one copy shall be taken
into consideration. Each copy of the attachments of the request shall be attached to the other copies
of the request. If the client filed the request or its attachments in copies less than prescribed by the
law, in case of lack of rectification of the irregularities defined in paragraph (4), the opposition, the
request for cancellation and the request for revocation shall be considered withdrawn, and the
statement of the applicant or the holder of the trade mark shall be considered not to have been
submitted.
(4) Together with a notice about the legal consequences of the omission, the parties shall be
invited or notified to rectify the irregularities of documents submitted in trade mark matters.
(5) Public hearings shall not be held in trade mark matters.
Time limits
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
16
Article 41
(1) The time limits prescribed by this Act shall not be extended. Failing to comply with such
time limits shall involve legal consequences without further notice.
(2) Where this Act does not prescribe any time limit to rectify irregularities or to submit a
statement, a time limit of at least thirty days shall be fixed for the party, which may be extended on
request before the expiration of the period. A time limit of more than three months and more than
three extensions of a time limit may be granted only in particularly justified cases.
(3) The time limits prescribed for administration by the Public Administration Procedures
Act shall not apply to trade mark matters, neither shall apply the provisions of the Public
Administration Procedures Act prescribing time limits for other measures of the proceeding
authority.
(4) In trade mark matters the filing date of documents submitted by post is the date on
which the document was delivered to the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office. Documents
delivered after the time limit set by the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall be deemed
submitted in due time if the document was posted by registered mail before the expiration of the
time limit, unless the document was delivered later than two months after the expiration of the time
limit.
Restitutio in integrum
Article 42
(1) In trade mark matters – unless excluded under paragraph (5) – a request for restitutio in
integrum may be submitted within 15 days of the unobserved date or of the last day of the
unobserved time limit. The request must state the grounds for failing to comply and the
circumstances showing that the failure to comply occurred without the requesting party’s fault.
(2) Where the failure to comply became known to the party subsequently or the cause
thereof ceased subsequently, the time limit shall be reckoned from the date on which the failure to
comply became known or the cause thereof ceased. The request for restitutio in integrum shall be
admissible only within six months from the date not complied with or the last day of the time limit
not complied with.
(3) Where a time limit is not complied with, the omitted act must be carried out
simultaneously with the filing of the request for restitutio in integrum or – if it is admissible – an
extension of the time limit may be requested.
(4) If the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office grants restitutio in integrum, the acts
carried out by the party in default shall be considered to have been performed within the time limit
not complied with; a hearing held on the date not complied with shall be repeated where necessary.
Depending on the outcome of the new hearing, it shall be decided whether the decision taken at the
original hearing should maintain or should be revoked in whole or in part.
(5) Restitutio in integrum shall be excluded:
(a) in the event of failing to comply with the time limit prescribed for filing the declaration
of priority [Article 53(2)];
(b) in the event of failing to comply with the time limit of six months fixed for claiming
convention or exhibition priority;
(c) in the event of failing to comply with the time limit prescribed for filing the opposition
[Article 61/B(1) and (2) and Article 76/P(3)];
(d) in the event of failing to comply with the time limit fixed for filing the request for
accelerated procedure [Article 64/A(1)].
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
17
Suspension of the procedure
Article 43
(1) Where legal proceedings are instituted with respect to the entitlement to file a trade mark
application or to the right to trade mark protection, the trade mark procedure shall be suspended
until the court decision becomes final. If deciding on the merits of a trade mark case depends on a
previous consideration on such a matter in which the procedure falls within the competence of
another authority, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall suspend the trade mark
procedure.
(2) In the event of the death of a party or the dissolution of a legal entity, the procedure shall
be suspended until the successor in title is communicated and attested. If the successor in title is not
communicated within a reasonable time according to the circumstances of the case, the Hungarian
Intellectual Property Office shall terminate the procedure or shall decide on the basis of the
material at its disposal.
(3) The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall suspend the trade mark procedure at the
request of the party or ex officio if the case cannot be decided on solid grounds without a decision
taken in another, closely connected procedure under its own competence.
(4) The trade mark registration procedure cannot be suspended at the request of the party,
except where the provisions of paragraph (1) or (3) would apply.
(5) The suspension of the procedure shall interrupt all time limits, and the time limits shall
recommence from the termination of the suspension.
(6) Even in case of suspension of the procedure, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office
may decide that the suspension shall not affect the ongoing procedural actions and the time limits
determined for performing thereof.
Representation
Article 44
(1) In the absence of a provision of an international treaty to the contrary, foreign applicants
shall be represented by an authorised patent attorney or an attorney-at-law in all trade mark matters
within the competence of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office.
(2) A power of attorney shall be made in writing. As to the validity of a power of attorney
given to a patent attorney, an attorney-at-law, a patent attorneys’ office, a patent attorneys’
partnership or a law office – either in the country or abroad – the signature by the mandator shall be
sufficient for it to be valid. The power of attorney may also be a general authorization, on the basis
of which the representative can proceed in all trade mark cases within the competence of the
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office, to which the mandator is a party. A power of attorney given
to a law office, a patent attorneys’ office or a patent attorneys’ partnership shall be deemed to be a
power of attorney given to any person who certifies that he/she works within the framework of the
office or partnership.
(3) The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall appoint a trustee from among the patent
attorneys and attorneys-at-law in the trade mark procedure:
(a) for unknown heirs or for a party whose whereabouts are unknown, at the request of the
opposing party, or
(b) for a foreign party not having an authorized representative, at the request of the opposing
party.
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
18
(4) Paragraph (1) and paragraph (3)(b) shall not apply if the foreigner is a natural person or
a legal entity whose permanent residence or domicile is in the territory of a Member State of the
European Economic Area.
(5) Where paragraph (3)(b) and paragraph (4) may not be applied and the foreigner has not
complied with the requirements laid down in paragraph (1), the Hungarian Intellectual Property
Office shall apply in the trade mark procedure the provisions of Article 59(2) to (4) mutatis
mutandis, except that it shall decide on the request on the basis of the information at its disposal if
the foreigner participating in the procedure is the opposing party does not complied with the
requirements laid down in paragraph (1).
(6) The party who requested the appointment shall be required to advance the costs and the
remuneration of the trustee.
Use of languages
Article 45
(1) The language of trade mark procedures shall be Hungarian, the trade mark application
shall be drawn up in Hungarian.
(2) In trade mark matters, documents in foreign languages may also be filed; however, the
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office may require that a translation into Hungarian be filed.
Submission of certified translations or legalized documents may be required only if the accuracy of
the translation or the authenticity of the facts included in the foreign document is questionable with
good reason.
Access to files
Article 46
(1) Any person may inspect the files of trade mark applications, except for draft decisions
and all other documents used for the preparation of decisions and expert opinions that were not
communicated to the parties and the documents defined in paragraph (2).
(2) In addition to cases covered by the Public Administration Procedures Act, personal data
not indicated in the Trade Mark Register and not published in official information shall be excluded
from inspection, unless the person concerned explicitly approved the inspection thereof or a third
person is allowed to access to documents containing personal data pursuant to the provisions of the
Public Administration Procedures Act.
(3) Upon payment of a fee, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall issue copies of
documents that may be inspected.
(4) Procedures in trade mark matters shall be public only if there is an opposing party
participating.
Legal remedies
Article 46/A
(1) Against the decisions of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office appeals, rehearing or
supervisory procedures and notice of the prosecutor under the Act of Prosecution shall not be
admissible.
(2) Decision of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office in trade mark matters shall be
reviewed by the court in non-contentious civil procedure laid down in Chapter XI.
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
19
(3) In the absence of a provision of this Act to the contrary, the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office may withdraw or modify its decisions – terminating the procedure – taken in the
following matters only if a request for review is filed and only until such request is transmitted to
the court:
(a) registration of trade marks;
(b) renewal of trade mark protection;
(c) division of trade mark protection;
(d) lapse of trade mark protection by reason of surrender;
(e) cancellation of trade marks;
(f) declaration of revocation of trade mark protection;
(g) forwarding the request for an international trade mark application as well as a request for
subsequent designation of the protection resulting from an international trade mark registration;
(h) final refusal of the protection of a sign designating Hungary;
(i) refusal of the effect of an assignment or of a licence recorded in the international register
with respect to the protection resulting from an international registration designating the territory of
Hungary;
(j) conversion of an international registration into a national trade mark application.
(4) In the absence of a provision of this Act to the contrary, the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office may withdraw or modify its decision – terminating the procedure – taken in the
matters referred to in paragraph (3)(e) and (f) on the basis of a request for review only if it
establishes that its decision is contrary to law or if the parties request unanimously the modification
or withdrawal of the decision.
(4a) In cases where no opposing parties are involved, the Hungarian Intellectual Property
Office may – according to the request for review – withdraw or modify the decisions defined in
Article 77(1)(b) to (e) if the decision does not infringe the law, however the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office agrees with the content of the request for review.
(4b) Decision based on a request for review shall be communicated to the requester and to
whom the decision concerned by the request for review was communicated.
(4c) The same legal remedy shall apply against the modifying decision as against the
modified decision.
(5) Paragraph (4) shall also apply to rulings taken in the matter referred to in paragraph 3(a),
provided that a notice of opposition was filed against the trade mark application and the Hungarian
Intellectual Property Office did not refuse the trade mark application for any ground laid down in
Articles 2 and 3.
Judicial execution
Article 46/B
(1) The provisions of the Public Administration Procedures Act relating to execution shall
apply to orders of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office imposing a procedural fine.
(2) Decisions of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office on the apportionment of costs
shall be enforced by applying the provisions of Act LIII of 1994 on Judicial Execution.
Costs and fees
Article 46/C
(1) In trade mark matters an exemption from the payment of costs may not be permissible.
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
20
(2) Apart from the obligations to pay fees laid down by this Act, fees for administrative
services shall be paid in trade mark matters – the amount of which is defined by specific legislation
and which shall be paid pursuant to detailed rules laid down in specific legislation – for the
following requests, too:
(a) requests for amendment, extension of time limits and restitutio in integrum;
(b) requests for recording succession in title and license contracts, requests for constitution
of right of pledge.
(3) In justified cases, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office may reduce the amount of
the fee of the professional representative if it is not commensurate with the actual representation
performed. In this case, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall proceed by applying the
provisions on the fees and expenses of the attorneys at law and patent attorneys applicable in court
proceedings mutatis mutandis.
Electronic administration and official services
Article 46/D
(1) In trade mark matters a party to the procedure is not entitled to, except for the cases
under paragraph (2) and (3), communicate with the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office, and the
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall not to be obliged to communicate with the party in
electronic form in writing.
(2) The following may also be filed in electronic form:
(a) trade mark applications;
(b) requests for renewal;
(c) requests for recording of the changes in the facts specified in Article 47 (2)(e) to (f) in
the Trade Mark Register;
(d) requests for accelerated procedure [Article 64/A(1) to (6)] and requests for particularly
accelerated procedure [Article 64/A(7) to (8)];
(e) requests for an extract from the Register, and;
(f) requests for the inspection of the files.
(3) If a party to the procedure initiated proceedings under paragraph (2)(b) to (f) in
electronic form via the identification service provided by the Government, the Hungarian
Intellectual Property Office shall communicate to him its decisions made concerning the request, or
send him certified extract from the Register in electronic form.
(4) The documents mentioned in paragraph (2) shall be filed electronically by using the
electronic form drawn up by the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office for this purpose.
(5) On receipt of the document filed in electronic form, the Hungarian Intellectual Property
Office shall send the party – in a manner laid down by specific legislation – an automatic
notification containing an electronic receipt number.
(6) After receipt of a document filed in electronic form, the Hungarian Intellectual Property
Office shall examine without delay whether it meets the legal requirements relating to electronic
administration.
(7) In the case of electronic sending, the document shall be considered to have been filed
when the automatic notification of the electronic receipt was sent to the party, except where the
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office establishes that the received document is uninterpretable
and notifies the party thereof by electronic mail.
(8) The party sending an uninterpretable document is obliged to acknowledge receipt of the
notification under paragraph (7). If the party does not acknowledge receipt of the notification
within fifteen days, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall forward it to him by mail.
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
21
(9) Detailed rules for the electronic filing of the documents mentioned in paragraph (2) are
laid down by specific legislation.
(10) Requesting and providing information by SMS shall be inadmissible in trade mark
matters.
Chapter VIII
TRADE MARK REGISTER, INFORMATION TO THE PUBLIC
Trade Mark Register
Article 47
(1) The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall keep a Trade Mark Register of trade
mark applications and trade marks in which all facts and circumstances concerning trade mark
rights shall be entered in accordance with Article 48.
(2) The Trade Mark Register shall contain, in particular, the following entries:
(a) registration number of the trade mark;
(b) reference number of the application;
(c) representation of the trade mark;
(d) list of goods or services;
(e) name (official designation) and address (registered seat) of the holder of the trade mark;
(f) name and registered seat of the representative;
(g) filing date of the application;
(h) priority data;
(i) date of the decision on the registration of the trade mark;
(j) renewal of trade mark protection;
(k) lapse of trade mark protection, the date and the grounds for lapse of trade mark
protection and limitation of the trade mark protection;
(l) licenses of use.
(3) The Trade Mark Register authentically attests the existence of the rights and facts
recorded therein. In absence of proof to the contrary, the rights and facts recorded in the Trade
Mark Register shall be presumed to be existent. The burden of proof against the data recorded in
the Trade Mark Register shall be on the person who disputes their correctness or authenticity.
(4) Any right relating to the trade mark protection may only be invoked against a third party
who acquired his right in good faith and for a consideration if it is recorded in the Trade Mark
Register.
(5) Any person may have access to the Trade Mark Register, the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office shall provide electronic access thereto on its website. Any person may ask for a
certified copy of the data recorded in the Trade Mark Register on payment of a fee.
Entries in the Trade Mark Register
Article 48
(1) The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall make entries and record facts occurred
in trade mark procedures in the Trade Mark Register on the basis of its own decisions or by
decision of other authorities or the court. With respect to the entries made on the basis of the
decisions listed in Article 77(1), the Trade Mark Register shall also contain the date when such
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
22
decisions have become final. If a request for review was filed against any decision listed in Article
77(1), this fact as well as such decision is not final shall also be recorded.
(2) The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall decide on the acknowledgement and
recording of rights and facts relating to trade mark protection – except for facts occurred in trade
mark procedures – on the basis of a request filed in writing. An official document or a private
document providing sufficient evidence shall be attached to such request. Where requests are filed
to the same case in a way that their fulfilment would exclude each other, the requests shall be
proceeded in order of their date of receipt.
(3) A request shall be inadmissible if it is based on a document which is invalid due to
formal irregularities or which lacks an official authentication required by law, or if it is clear from
the contents of the document that the legal statement included therein is invalid.
(4) Where the request or its enclosures contain rectifiable irregularities, the party shall be
invited to rectify them or to submit comments. The request shall be refused if it does not satisfy the
requirements after the rectification or submitting the comments. If the party does not respond to the
invitation within the prescribed time limit, the request shall be considered withdrawn.
Information to the public
Article 49
The official journal of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall contain, in particular,
the following data and facts relating to trade mark applications and trade marks:
(a) on publication of the trade mark application, the name and address (registered seat) of
the applicant and the representative, the reference number of the application, the filing date and the
date of priority where the latter is different, the sign and the list of goods or services;
(b) after registration of the trade mark, the registration number, the name and address
(registered seat) of the holder, name and address (registered seat) of the representative, the
reference number, the filing date and the date of priority where the latter is different, the trade
mark, the list of goods or services and the date of the decision on registration;
(c) in the case of renewal or division of trade mark protection, the relevant data thereof;
(d) the lapse of trade mark protection, the legal grounds and the date thereof;
(e) changes in rights relating to trade mark protection recorded in the Trade Mark Register.
Article 49/A
Official information on international trade mark applications provided for in Chapters X/B
to X/D shall also be published in the official journal of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office.
Chapter IX
TRADE MARK REGISTRATION PROCEDURE
Filing of a trade mark application and its requirements
Article 50
(1) The procedure for the registration of a trade mark shall begin with the filing of a trade
mark application with the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office.
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
23
(2) A trade mark application shall contain a request for trade mark registration, the sign, the
list of goods or services and, where necessary, other relevant documents.
(3) Detailed formal requirements to be complied with by trade mark applications shall be
laid down by specific legislation.
(4) A trade mark application shall be subject to the payment of a filing fee determined by
specific legislation; the fee shall be paid within two months after the date of filing.
(5) Where the list of goods or services in the trade mark application have been prepared in a
foreign language, the list of goods or services shall be filed in Hungarian within four months after
the date of filing.
(6) The applicant may withdraw the trade mark application until its registration, in
compliance with the provisions of Article 32.
Article 50/A
[repealed]
Date of filing
Article 51
(1) The filing date of an application shall be the date on which the application filed with the
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office contains at least:
(a) an indication that trade mark protection is sought,
(b) information identifying the applicant,
(c) a representation of the sign and a list of goods or services, even though the list of goods
or services do not comply with other requirements.
(2) In place of filing a representation of the sign and a list of goods or services, reference to
a priority document is sufficient for according a date of filing.
Unity of the sign, list of goods or services
Article 52
(1) A trade mark application may seek trade mark protection for one sign only.
(2) The list of goods or services is the enumeration of goods and services with respect to
which trade mark protection for the sign is sought.
(3) In the list of goods or services, the goods or services shall be grouped according to the
classes of the Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services
for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks and, if possible, by using the terms included therein.
Priority
Article 53
(1) The date establishing priority shall be:
(a) generally, the date of filing of the trade mark application (application priority);
(b) in the cases defined by the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, the
date of filing of the foreign application (convention priority);
(c) in the cases defined in the communication of the President of the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office published in the Hungarian Official Journal, the first day of displaying the sign at
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
24
an exhibition, which is not earlier than six months prior to the date of filing of the application
(exhibition priority);
(d) the date of filing of a previously filed and pending trade mark application for the same
sign, which is not earlier than six months prior to the current application, provided that there has
been no other priority claimed in relation thereto (internal priority).
(2) Convention, exhibition and internal priority shall be claimed within two months after the
filing of the application. The document establishing convention priority and the certification of
exhibition shall be filed within four months after the date of filing of the application.
(3) Convention priority may also be claimed, under the conditions defined by the Paris
Convention, if the foreign application has been filed in a Member of the World Trade Organization
which is not party to the Paris Convention or, subject to reciprocity, in any other State. In matter of
reciprocity, the opinion of the President of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall be
decisive.
Certification of exhibition
Article 54
(1) The authority responsible for the exhibition shall attest to the display and date of the
exhibition by means of a certificate of exhibition.
(2) The certificate must be accompanied by the sign whose identity with the sign displayed
at the exhibition shall be attested.
(3) The certificate may only be issued during the period of the exhibition and only while the
sign can be seen at the exhibition.
Examination on filing
Article 55
Following the filing of a trade mark application, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office
shall examine whether
(a) the application satisfies the requirements for according a date of filing (Article 51),
(b) the filing fee has been paid [Article 50(4)],
(c) the list of goods or services has been filed in Hungarian language [Article 50(5)].
Article 56
(1) If a date of filing cannot be accorded, the applicant shall be invited to rectify the
irregularities within 30 days.
(2) If the applicant complies with that invitation within the specified time limit, the date of
receipt of the rectification shall be accorded as the date of filing. Failing to comply with the said
invitation, the trade mark application shall be considered withdrawn.
(3) The applicant shall be notified of the accorded date of filing.
(4) If the filing fee has not been paid or the list of goods or services has not been filed in
Hungarian language, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall invite the applicant to rectify
the irregularities within the time limit specified by this Act [Article 50(4) and (5)]. Failing to
comply with the said invitation, the application shall be considered withdrawn.
Communication of certain data
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
25
Article 57
[repealed]
Observations
Article 58
(1) During the procedure for the registration of a trade mark any person may file an
observation with the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office to the effect that the sign may not be
granted trade mark protection for any grounds referred to in Articles 2 and 3.
(2) Such observation shall be taken into consideration when the requirement objected to in
the observation is examined, except when the observation is filed at a time when its consideration
would unduly delay the decision-making. Following the publication of the trade mark application
(Article 61/A) the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall extend substantive examination,
only on the basis of on observation, to ascertain whether the sign is not excluded from trade mark
protection for any grounds referred to in Articles 2 and 3 and indicated in the observation. The
examination of facts shall be performed within the confines of the observation and on the basis of
the statements ot the person making the observation and data justified by him.
(3) The applicant shall be notified of the observation, unless the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office ignores the observation in accordance with the first sentence of paragraph (2).
(4) The person filing the observation shall not be party to the procedure for the registration
of a trade mark. This person shall be notified of the outcome of his observation.
Examination as to formal requirements
Article 59
(1) If a trade mark application satisfies the requirements examined under Article 55, the
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall examine whether the formal requirements of Article
50(2) and (3) have been met and whether the sign is uniform [Article 52(1)].
(2) Where the application does not comply with the requirements examined under paragraph
(1), the applicant shall be invited to rectify the irregularities or to divide the application.
(3) The trade mark application shall be refused if, in spite of rectification or comments, it
still does not comply with the requirements under examination. An application may be refused only
for grounds precisely and expressly stated in the invitation.
(4) Where the applicant does not reply to the invitation within the fixed time limit or does
not divide the application, the trade mark application shall be considered withdrawn.
(5) In the course of the examination of the trade mark application as to formal requirements,
the provisions of Article 61(6) and (7) shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Search for earlier rights
Article 60
(1) If a trade mark application meets the requirements laid down in Article 59, the
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall carry out a search for earlier rights referred to in
Article 4 and shall draw up a search report on the basis of the sign, with due regard to the list of
goods or services.
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
26
(2) The search report shall indicate those data which may be taken into consideration in
deciding whether the sign to which the trade mark application relates is registrable.
(3) The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall send the search report to the applicant.
Notification of the holder of an earlier right indicated in the search report
Article 60/A
(1) The applicant, the holder and the licensee recorded in the Trade Mark Register may
request the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office to notify him of the later trade mark application
in the search report of which his earlier right was indicated by sending him a copy of the search
report.
(2) The request may be filed for a period defined in calendar months, not exceeding one
year and starting on the first day of the calendar year or half-year; the request shall be subject to the
payment of a fee determined by specific legislation. The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office
shall only fulfil the request after the payment of the fee.
(3) In case of failure to send the notification, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office
shall – on request – refund the whole, or proportional to the failure, the part of the fee paid under
paragraph (2). The failure to send the notification shall not involve any legal consequences, it shall
not affect the application of provisions concerning, in particular, opposition and acquiescence.
Substantive examination ex officio
Article 61
(1) If a trade mark application satisfies the requirements laid down in Article 59, the
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall carry out a substantive examination of the trade mark
application.
(2) The substantive examination shall ascertain:
(a) whether the sign meets the requirements of Article 1 and whether it is not excluded from
trade mark protection under Articles 2 and 3;
(b) whether the application complies with the requirements laid down by this Act.
(3) If a trade mark application does not meet the requirements examined under paragraph
(2), the applicant shall be invited, according to the nature of the objection, to rectify the
irregularities or to submit comments.
(4) A trade mark application shall be refused in whole or in part if it does not meet the
examined requirements even after the rectification of the irregularities or the submitting of
comments. An application may be refused only on grounds that have been precisely and expressly
stated and duly reasoned in the invitation. Where necessary, a further invitation shall be issued.
(5) If the applicant fails to reply to the invitation within the fixed time limit, the trade mark
application shall be considered withdrawn.
(6) Simultaneously with the forwarding to the court of the request for reviewing the decision
on the partial refusal of the trade mark application [Article 77(9) and (10)], the registration
procedure shall be suspended with respect to the remaining part of the list of goods or services until
the final termination of the court proceedings.
(7) On the basis of substantive examination carried out ex officio, the registration procedure
shall be continued with respect to the remaining part of the list of goods or services after the
decision on the partial refusal of the trade mark application has become final.
Publication of the trade mark application
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
27
Article 61/A
(1) If a trade mark application satisfies the requirements laid down in Article 59, the
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall publish it, at the earliest, one month after the search
report has been sent to the applicant [Article 60(3)].
(2) Publication shall be made by publishing official information to the public in the official
journal of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office as laid down in Article 49(a).
(3) The applicant shall be notified of the publication.
(4) After publication, official information shall be published in the official journal of the
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office, if the application is withdrawn or considered withdrawn,
refused, amended or divided.
Substantive examination upon opposition
Article 61/B
(1) Within a period of three months following the date of publication of a trade mark
application, a notice of opposition to registration of the trade mark may be filed on the grounds of
Articles 4 to 6:
(a) by the holder of the earlier trade mark and the licensee recorded in the Trade Mark
Register thereof;
(b) by the holder of the right referred to in Article 5(1), in the case of an industrial property
right the licensee recorded in the Trade Mark Register and in the case of copyright the person
acquiring the right of use on the basis of a licensing agreement thereof;
(c) by the prior user on the basis of Article 5(2)(a);
(d) on the basis of Article 6 by the holder without whose authorization the agent or the
representative has applied for the registration of a sign in his own name.
(2) [repealed]
(3) It shall indicate the grounds on which it is based (grounds for opposition) and
documentary evidence shall be attached.
(4) An opposition fee determined by specific legislation shall be paid within one month
from the date of filing of the notice of opposition.
(5) If the opposition does not comply with the requirements laid down in paragraphs (1) to
(3), the opponent shall be invited to rectify the irregularities; if the opposition fee has not been paid,
he shall be invited to make payment within the time limit prescribed by this Act. Failing to comply
with these requirements, the opposition shall be considered withdrawn.
Article 61/C
The opponent shall be a party to the procedure for the registration of a trade mark in the
subject matter of the opposition.
Article 61/D
(1) The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall invite the applicant to submit
comments on the opposition. Except for the case referred to in paragraph (2), it shall decide on the
registration of the trade mark following the written preparatory work. The order terminating the
procedure may also be taken without a hearing.
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
28
(2) Following the written preparatory work, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall
hold a hearing if the applicant and the opponent must be heard together in order to clarify the facts
or if any of the parties so requests in due time.
(3) If the applicant fails to submit comments within the fixed time limit or to appear at the
hearing, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall decide on the opposition on the basis of
the evidence at its disposal.
(4) The orders taken in the course of a hearing and the ruling shall be pronounced on the day
of the hearing. The pronouncement may be deferred – for not more than eight days – only in
respect of the ruling and only in the event if it is indispensable because of the complexity of the
case. In such a case the time limit for pronouncement shall be fixed immediately and the ruling
shall be put into writing until the day of pronouncement.
(5) The pronouncement of the decision shall consist of the presentation of the operative part
and of the grounds.
(6) The decision shall be put in writing not later than fifteen days from the day it was taken
– except where the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office deferred its pronouncement – and it shall
be delivered within fifteen days from putting it in writing.
(7) The opposition shall be considered withdrawn if the opponent
(a) fails to reply to the invitation within the fixed time limit, or
(b) fails to appear at the hearing and has not requested in advance to hold it in his absence.
(8) Following the expiry of the time limit prescribed for filing a notice of opposition
[Article 61/B(1) and (2)] no grounds may be indicated as grounds for opposition which have not
been stated as such within the time limit referred to. When delivering its final decision, the
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall not take into consideration the grounds so specified.
Article 61/E
(1) If the opposition is based on conflict with an earlier trade mark, the burden of proof that
the use of the opposing party’s trade mark met the requirements of Article 18 at the date of the
publication of the trade mark application shall be on the opponent. At the request of the applicant
filed in due time the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall invite the opponent to furnish
such proof.
(2) A trade mark application may not be refused on the basis of an opposition in respect of
which the furnishing of proof referred to in paragraph (1) was unsuccessful.
(3) Where the opponent does not reply to the invitation referred to in paragraph (1), the
notice of opposition shall be considered withdrawn.
Article 61/F
In the subject matter of the opposition settlement may be reached.
Article 61/G
(1) If there is more than one notice of opposition in respect of the same trade mark
application, they shall be dealt with in the same procedure.
(2) If there is more than one notice of opposition in respect of the same trade mark
application, the procedure may be suspended with respect to some of the oppositions. Review of an
order suspending the procedure in such case [Article 77(1)] cannot be requested from the court
separately, it may only be contested in a request for the review of a decision on the registration of
the trade mark. The order suspending the procedure in such case shall, if necessary, specify the
costs of the opponent arising until the suspension of the procedure.
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
29
(3) If, in the trade mark registration procedure, a decision refusing the application becomes
final, the opposition in respect of which the procedure have been suspended shall be considered
withdrawn. Otherwise the procedure shall be continued on the basis of the opposition in respect of
which the procedure has previously been suspended.
Article 61/H
(1) In the case of opposition, the trade mark application shall also be examined to ascertain,
with due regard to the grounds of the opposition, whether the sign is not excluded from trade mark
protection under Articles 4 to 7.
(2) A trade mark application shall be refused in whole or in part if it does not meet the
requirements examined under paragraph (1).
(3) The losing party shall be required to bear the costs arising in connection with the
opposition; the opponent shall not be deemed as a losing party if under Article 61/G(3) the
opposition shall be considered withdrawn.
(4) Upon request, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall refund the opposition fee
[Article 61/B(4)] to the extent and on conditions laid down by specific legislation:
(a) if the trade mark application is refused under Article 61(4);
(b) if the trade mark application is considered withdrawn under Article 61(5);
(c) if the applicant withdraws the trade mark application [Article 50(6)];
(d) if the opposition is considered withdrawn under Article 61/G(3).
Amendment and division of the application
Article 62
(1) A trade mark application may not be amended in respect of:
(a) the sign,
(b) the list of goods or services in such a way that it extends beyond that contained in the
application on the date of filing.
(2) The applicant shall be entitled to amend the list of goods or services as laid down in
paragraph (1)(b) until the day on which the decision on the registration of the trade mark is
delivered.
Article 63
(1) The applicant may divide the application until the day on which the decision on the
registration of the trade mark is delivered,
(a) prior to the official invitation to this effect [Article 59(2)], if he claimed protection for
more than one sign in one application; or
(b) if, by dividing the list of goods or services, he claims protection for specified goods or
services separately.
(2) A fee determined by specific legislation shall be paid for division within two months
from the filing of the relevant request.
(3) If the fee for division is not paid upon filing the request, the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office shall invite the applicant to rectify the irregularity within the time limit in
paragraph (2). Failing to comply with the said invitation, the request for division shall be
considered withdrawn.
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
30
(4) The request for division shall be refused if an opposition to the registration of a trade
mark is filed and the division of the application separates the part of the list of goods or services
against which the opposition has been directed.
Registration of the trade mark
Article 64
(1) If the trade mark application and the sign to which it relates meet all the requirements of
the examination [Article 61(2) and Article 61/H(1)], the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office
shall register the subject matter of the application as a trade mark. The date of the decision on
registration shall be the date of registration of the trade mark.
(2) The registration of the trade mark shall be recorded in the Trade Mark Register (Article
47), and relevant information shall be given in the official journal of the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office [Article 49(b)].
(3) After registration, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall issue a trade mark
certificate to which the extract from the register shall be annexed.
Accelerated procedure
Article 64/A
(1) If the applicant so requests, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall apply the
accelerated trade mark registration procedure. The request may be filed within one month from the
date of filing of the application.
(2) A fee determined by specific legislation shall be paid for the request for accelerated
procedure within one month from the filing of the request.
(3) [repealed]
(4) If the fee for the request is not paid, the applicant shall be invited to rectify the
irregularities within the time limit prescribed by this Act. Failing to comply with the said invitation,
the request shall be considered withdrawn.
(5) If the request complies with the requirements laid down in paragraphs (1) and (2), the
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall order the accelerated procedure.
(6) In the case of an accelerated procedure, by way of derogation from the provisions of
Chapters VII and IX,
(a) a time limit of fifteen days may also be fixed for the rectification of irregularities or for
the submission of comments;
(b) the trade mark application may also be published prior to the expiry of one month
[Article 61/A(1)] from sending the search report to the applicant [Article 60(3)];
(c) with respect to opposition, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall only hold an
oral hearing if the clarification of the facts requires that the parties be heard together or if the
parties so request unanimously in due time;
(d) the filing fee shall be paid within the time limit laid down in paragraph (2).
(7) If the applicant so requests specially in the request for accelerated procedure, the
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall register the sign as a trade mark simultaneously with
the publication of the trade mark application (particularly accelerated procedure), except that the
provisions of Article 64(3) shall only apply after the expiry of the time limit prescribed for filing a
notice of opposition [Article 61/B(1) and (2)]. A request for particularly accelerated procedure may
only be filed within the time limit laid down in paragraph (1) for the filing of a request for
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
31
accelerated procedure; the fee for the requested for particularly accelerated procedure is one and a
half times higher than that for the accelerated procedure.
(8) If a notice of opposition to the registration of the sign as a trade mark is filed, the
decision ordering the registration of the trade mark under paragraph (7) shall be withdrawn and the
registration procedure shall be continued. Withdrawal of the decision ordering the registration of
the trade mark under paragraph (7) shall be recorded in the Trade Mark Register, and relevant
information shall be given in the official journal of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office.
Chapter X
OTHER PROCEDURES IN TRADE MARK MATTERS
Renewal procedure
Article 65
(1) Trade mark protection shall be renewed [Article 11(2)] by the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office at the request of the holder.
(2) The request for renewal shall indicate the registration number of the trade mark to be
renewed; otherwise the provisions concerning the requirements of trade mark applications [Article
50(2) and (3)] shall apply mutatis mutandis to the request and to its documents.
(3) The request for renewal may be filed not earlier than twelve months before the expiry of
the protection and within a period of six months at the latest from the date of expiry or from the
date of registration, whichever expires later.
(4) A fee determined by specific legislation shall be paid for the request for renewal within
two months from the filing of the request.
(5) On renewal of protection, the trade mark may not be altered and the list of goods or
services may not be extended.
Article 65/A
[repealed]
Article 66
(1) If the request for renewal does not comply with the requirements laid down in Article
65(1) to (4), the requesting party shall be invited to rectify the irregularities.
(2) The request for renewal shall be refused if, even after rectification or comments, it still
does not comply with the requirements stated in the invitation. Where the requesting party does not
reply to the invitation within the fixed time limit, the request for renewal shall be considered
withdrawn.
(3) If the fee for the request for renewal has not been paid, the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office shall invite the requesting party to rectify the irregularity within the time limit
prescribed by this Act. Failing to comply with the said invitation, the request shall be considered
withdrawn.
Article 67
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
32
(1) If the request meets the requirements laid down in Article 65, the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office shall renew the trade mark protection.
(2) The renewal of the trade mark protection shall be recorded in the Trade Mark Register,
and relevant information shall be given in the official journal of the Hungarian Intellectual Property
Office.
(3) After renewal, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall issue a trade mark
certificate to which the extract from the register shall be annexed.
Procedure for division
Article 68
(1) By separating the list of goods or services, the holder may divide the trade mark
protection in respect of specified goods or services.
(2) A request for division of trade mark protection and the necessary documents shall be
filed in as many copies, in conformity with each other, as the number of the parts into which the
original list of goods or services is to be divided.
(3) The request for division shall indicate the registration number of the original trade mark;
otherwise the provisions concerning the requirements of trade mark applications [Article 50(2) and
(3)] shall apply mutatis mutandis to the request and to its documents.
(4) A fee determined by specific legislation shall be paid for the request for division within
two months from the filing of the request.
Article 69
(1) If the request for division does not comply with the requirements laid down in Article
68(1) to (3), the holder shall be invited to rectify the irregularities.
(2) The request for division shall be refused if, even after rectification or comments, it still
does not comply with the requirements stated in the invitation. Where the holder does not reply to
the invitation, the request for division shall be considered withdrawn.
(3) If the fee for the request for division has not been paid, the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office shall invite the holder to rectify the irregularity within the time limit prescribed by
this Act. Failing to comply with the said invitation, the request for division shall be considered
withdrawn.
Article 70
(1) If the request meets the requirements laid down in Article 68, the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office shall divide the trade mark protection.
(2) The division of the trade mark protection shall be recorded in the Trade Mark Register
and relevant information shall be given in the official journal of the Hungarian Intellectual Property
Office.
(3) After division, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall issue a trade mark
certificate for each trade mark, to which the extract from the register shall be annexed.
Lapse by reason of expiration and surrender
Article 71
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
33
(1) In the case of lapse by reason of expiration of protection, the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office shall inform the holder of the possibility of renewal.
(2) Where the holder surrenders trade mark protection (Article 32), the Hungarian
Intellectual Property Office shall declare lapse of protection by an order.
(3) The lapse by reason of expiration of trade mark protection without renewal [Article
30(1)(a)] and by reason of surrender shall be recorded in the Trade Mark Register and relevant
information shall be published in the official journal of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office.
Cancellation procedure
Article 72
(1) Any person may institute proceedings for cancellation of a trade mark against the holder
under Article 33, with the exception laid down in paragraph (2).
(2) Under Articles 4 to 6, only the holder of an earlier, conflicting right may request
cancellation of a trade mark.
(3) The request shall indicate the grounds on which it is based and documentary evidence
shall be attached.
(4) A fee determined by specific legislation shall be paid for the request for cancellation
within two months from the filing of the request.
(5) If the request for cancellation does not comply with the requirements laid down in this
Act, the requesting party shall be invited to rectify the irregularities; if the fee for the request has
not been paid, the requesting party shall be invited to make payment within the time limit
prescribed by this Act. Failing to comply with these requirements, the request for cancellation shall
be considered withdrawn.
Article 73
(1) The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall invite the holder to submit comments
on the request for cancellation. Following the written preparatory work, it shall decide at a hearing
on the cancellation of the trade mark, on limitation of the trade mark protection or refusal of the
request. The order terminating the procedure may also be taken without a hearing. Following the
expiration of the time limit fixed by the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office for the requesting
party, no grounds may be indicated as grounds for cancellation, which have not been stated as such
within the time limit referred to. When delivering the final decision, the grounds so specified shall
not be taken into consideration.
(2) If the request for cancellation is based on conflict with an earlier trade mark of the
requesting party, the burden of proof that the use of his trade mark met the requirements of Article
18 at the time of filing the request for cancellation shall be on the requesting party. At the request
of the holder filed in due time, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall invite the requesting
party to furnish such proof.
(3) A trade mark may not be cancelled on the basis of a request for cancellation in respect of
which the furnishing of proof referred to in paragraph (2) was unsuccessful.
(4) Where the requesting party does not reply to the invitation referred to in paragraph (2),
the request for cancellation shall be considered withdrawn.
(5) The decisions taken in the course of hearings shall be pronounced on the day of the
hearing. The pronouncement may be deferred – for not more than eight days – only in respect of
the ruling and only in the event if it is indispensable due to the complexity of the case. In such a
case the time limit for pronouncement shall be fixed immediately, and the ruling shall be put into
writing until the day of pronouncement.
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
34
(6) The pronouncement of the decision shall consist of the presentation of the operative part
and of the grounds.
(7) The decision shall be put in writing not later than fifteen days from the day it was taken
– except where the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office deferred its pronouncement – and it shall
be delivered within fifteen days from putting it in writing.
Article 73/A
(1) At the request of any party, cancellation procedures shall be accelerated if proceedings
were initiated for trade mark infringement or a request for provisional measures was filed before
initiating an action and this fact is substantiated.
(2) For the request for accelerated procedure a fee determined by specific legislation shall
be paid within one month from the filing of the request.
(3) If the request does not meet the requirements referred to in paragraph (1), the party
requesting accelerated procedure shall be invited to rectify the irregularities or to submit comments.
The request for accelerated procedure shall be refused if it does not meet the requirements laid
down in this Act even after the rectification of irregularities or the submitting of comments. Failing
to comply with the said invitation, the request for accelerated procedure shall be considered
withdrawn.
(4) If the fee for the request has not been paid, the person requesting accelerated procedure
shall be invited to make payment within the time limit prescribed by this Act. Failing to comply
with the said invitation, the request for accelerated procedure shall be considered withdrawn.
(5) The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall establish the accelerated procedure by
an order.
(6) In the case of an accelerated procedure, by way of derogation from the provisions of
Articles 41 and 73 (a) a time limit of fifteen days may also be fixed for rectifying the irregularities
or submitting comments;
(b) an extension of time limits may be granted only in justified cases;
(c) the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall only hold an oral hearing if the
clarification of the facts requires that the parties be heard together or if any of the parties so
requests in due time.
Article 74
(1) If there is more than one request for cancellation of the same trade mark, they shall be
dealt with in the same procedure, if possible.
(2) If the request for cancellation is withdrawn, the procedure may be continued ex officio,
except for the case under Article 72(2). In such case, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office
shall also proceed within the framework of the request, taking into consideration the statements and
allegations made by the parties earlier. In the case referred to in Article 72(2), settlement may be
reached in the cancellation procedure.
(3) The losing party shall be required to bear the costs of the cancellation procedure. If the
holder of the trade mark has not provided any grounds for the cancellation procedure and he
surrenders the trade mark protection – at least in respect of the concerned part of the list of the
goods or services – with retroactive effect to the date of filing prior to the expiration of the time
limit for submitting comments [Article 73 (1)], the costs of the procedure shall be borne by the
requesting party.
(4) The cancellation of the trade mark or limitation of trade mark protection shall be
recorded in the Trade Mark Register and relevant information shall be given in the official journal
of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office.
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
35
Revocation by reason of non-use, loss of distinctive character,
becoming deceptive or dissolution of the holder without successor in title
Article 75
(1) Any person may institute proceedings for revocation of trade mark protection by reason
of non-use under Articles 18 and 34 and by reason of trade mark loss of distinctive character or
becoming deceptive under Article 35 against the holder and by reason of dissolution of the holder
without successor in title under Article 35/A.
(2) The request shall indicate the grounds on which it is based and documentary evidence
shall be attached. Where revocation is requested under Article 30(2) with retroactive effect to a date
which is earlier than the dates set in Article 30(1)(d) or (e), it shall be indicated in the request.
Where revocation is requested by reason of non-use, the burden of proof that the use of the trade
mark met the requirements of Article 18 shall be on the holder of the trade mark.
(3) A fee determined by specific legislation shall be paid for the request for revocation
within two months from the filing of the request.
(4) If the request for revocation does not comply with the requirements laid down in this
Act, the requesting party shall be invited to rectify the irregularities; if the fee for the request has
not been paid, the requesting party shall be invited to make payment within the time limit
prescribed by this Act. Failing to comply with these requirements, the request for revocation shall
be considered withdrawn.
Article 76
(1) The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall invite the holder to submit comments
on the request for revocation. Following the written preparatory work, it shall decide at a hearing
on the revocation of trade mark protection, in whole or in part, by reason of non-use, loss of
distinctive character, becoming deceptive or dissolution of the holder without successor in title or
on the refusal of the request. The order terminating the procedure may also be taken without a
hearing. The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall take its decisions without a hearing on the
revocation of trade mark protection by reason of the dissolution of the holder without a successor in
title. Article 73(5) to (7) shall apply to the pronouncement, putting in writing and delivery of
decisions taken in the course of hearings.
(2) If there is more than one request for revocation of the same trade mark, or there are
requests for both the cancellation and for the revocation of the same trade mark, they shall be dealt
with in the same procedure, if possible.
(3) If the request for revocation is withdrawn, the procedure may be continued ex officio. In
such case, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall also proceed within the framework of
the request, taking into consideration the statements and allegations made by the parties earlier.
(4) The losing party shall be required to bear the costs of the procedure for revocation. The
costs of the procedure for revocation by reason of dissolution of the holder without successor in
title shall, however, be borne by the requesting party. If the holder of the trade mark has not
provided any grounds for the procedure for revocation and he surrenders the trade mark protection
– at least in respect of the concerned part of the list of the goods or services – with retroactive effect
to the date of filing prior to the expiration of the time limit for submitting comments under
paragraph (1), the costs of the procedure shall be borne by the requesting party.
(5) The revocation of the trade mark protection, in whole or in part, by reason of non-use,
loss of distinctive character, becoming deceptive or dissolution of the holder without successor in
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
36
title shall be recorded in the Trade Mark Register and relevant information shall be given in the
official journal of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office.
PART III
PROVISIONS CONCERNING THE COMMUNITY TRADE MARK SYSTEM
Chapter X/A
COMMUNITY TRADE MARK AND COMMUNITY TRADE MARK APPLICATION
General provisions
Article 76/A
For the purposes of this Act:
(a) Community Trade Mark Regulation: the Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 on the
Community trade mark;
(b) Community trade mark: a trade mark as defined in Article 1(1) of the Community Trade
Mark Regulation;
(c) Community trade mark application: an application for the registration of a Community
trade mark, filed in accordance with the Community Trade Mark Regulation.
Forwarding the Community trade mark application
Article 76/B
(1) Where a Community trade mark application is filed with the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office, a fee determined by specific legislation shall be paid on filing the application for
forwarding it in accordance with Article 25(2) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.
(2) If the fee for forwarding the Community trade mark application has not been paid, the
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall invite the applicant to rectify the irregularities. The
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall forward the Community trade mark application after
the payment of the fee.
Community trade mark as earlier trade mark
Article 76/C
(1) For the purposes of Article 4 and Article 5(2)(b), the Community trade mark shall be
deemed an earlier trade mark of the same kind as a trade mark registered by the Hungarian
Intellectual Property Office on the basis of this Act, with the exceptions laid down in paragraphs
(2) and (3).
(2) For the purposes of Article 4(1)(c), the earlier Community trade mark having a
reputation in the European Community shall be taken into consideration in compliance with Article
9(1)(c) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.
(3) For the purposes of Article 4(3), a sign shall not be excluded from trade mark protection
if it conflicts with an earlier Community trade mark which has not been put to genuine use by the
holder in accordance with Article 15 of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
37
(4) For the purposes of this Act, reference to a use in accordance with the provisions of
Article 18 shall be construed in the case of Community trade marks as reference to a use in
accordance with the provisions of Article 15 of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.
(5) The provisions relating to acquiescence (Article 17) shall apply mutatis mutandis if the
earlier trade mark is a Community trade mark and the later trade mark is a trade mark registered by
the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office on the basis of this Act.
(6) The provisions of paragraphs (1) to (5) shall govern also for the purposes of Article
33(2).
Legal consequences of the infringement of a Community trade mark
Article 76/D
To the infringement of a Community trade mark the same legal consequences shall apply –
in accordance with the provisions of Article 14 of the Community Trade Mark Regulation as to
the infringement of a trade mark registered by the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office on the
basis of this Act.
Conversion into a national trade mark application
Article 76/E
(1) On a request – filed on the basis of Article 113(3) of the Community Trade Mark
Regulation – for the conversion of a Community trade mark application or for a Community trade
mark, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall start the procedure for the registration of the
trade mark by applying the provisions of Chapters VII to IX mutatis mutandis and on the conditions
laid down in paragraphs (2) to (5).
(2) The filing fee Article 50(4) shall be paid within two months from the receipt of the
request by the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office.
(3) The Hungarian translation of the request under paragraph (1) and of its documents shall
be filed with the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office within four months from the receipt of the
request by the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office. For the purposes of the provisions of Chapter
IX, this translation shall be considered as a translation to be filed on the basis of Article 50(5).
(4) The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall notify the requesting party of the
receipt of the request under paragraph (1) by sending simultaneously the notice under Article 56(4).
(5) The date of filing, the date of priority and the seniority shall be determined in
accordance with Article 112(3) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation. Article 50(3) shall be
applied with regard to the provisions of Article 114(2) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.
(6) In the procedure started under paragraph (1) on the basis of a request for the conversion
of a Community trade mark the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office, following the payment of
the filing fee and the filing of the translation prescribed in paragraph (3), shall register the
Community trade mark on the basis of this Act (Article 64) without any further examination.
(7) In any other matters pertaining to the examination of the request for the conversion of a
Community trade mark application or Community trade mark and to the procedure started under
paragraph (1), the provisions of Chapters VII to IX shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Seniority of a Community trade mark
Article 76/F
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
38
(1) A trade mark registered by the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office on the basis of
this Act, the seniority of which has been claimed with respect to a Community trade mark under
Articles 34 and 35 of the Community Trade Mark Regulation and the protection of which has
lapsed by reason of expiration of protection without renewal or by reason of surrender, may be
cancelled or revoked by reason of non-use, by reason of trade mark loss of distinctive character or
becoming deceptive or by reason of dissolution of the holder without successor in title, if the
conditions for cancellation or for revocation have existed both at the date of filing the request and
at the date of the earlier lapse of trade mark protection.
(2) It shall be indicated in the Trade Mark Register that the seniority of the trade mark has
been claimed with respect to a Community trade mark. Loss of seniority shall also be entered in the
Trade Mark Register.
(3) All facts and circumstances concerning trade marks, in particular licenses of use, right of
pledge, any other encumbrance of rights relating to trade marks or deriving from trade mark
protection as well as transfer and assignment of such rights, shall be entered into the Trade Mark
Register even after the lapse, by reason of expiration of protection without renewal or by reason of
surrender, of the protection of the trade mark the seniority of which has been claimed with respect
to a Community trade mark.
(4) A Community trade mark shall be taken into consideration as an earlier trade mark
(Article 76/C) with its duly claimed seniority even if the protection of the trade mark registered by
the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office under this Act, the seniority of which has been claimed
with respect to the Community trade mark, has lapsed by reason of expiration of protection without
renewal or by reason of surrender.
Article 76/G
[repealed]
Community trade mark court
Article 76/H
(1) In Hungary the Metropolitan Court of Justice shall proceed at first instance, in the
composition laid down in Article 78(2), as the Community trade mark court referred to in Article
95(1) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.
(2) The Metropolitan Court of Appeals, as the Community trade mark court of second
instance, shall have jurisdiction concerning appeals against the decisions of the Metropolitan Court
of Justice.
PART IV
PROVISIONS CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF TRADE
MARKS
Chapter X/B
GENERAL PROVISIONS CONCERNING INTERNATIONAL TRADE MARK
APPLICATIONS
General provisions
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
39
Article 76/I
(1) For the purposes of this Act:
(a) International trade mark application: an application filed under the Madrid Agreement
of April 14, 1891 Concerning the International Registration of Marks (for the purposes of this part
hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”) and under the Protocol of June 27, 1989 relating to the
Madrid Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “Protocol”);
(b) International Bureau: the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property
Organization;
(c) International register: the registry maintained by the International Bureau, of trade
marks filed under the Agreement or the Protocol;
(d) Application designating Hungary: an international trade mark application in which the
extension of protection to the territory of Hungary has been requested;
(e) Office of origin: the Office of the country of origin defined in Article 1(3) of the
Agreement or the Office of origin defined in Article 2(2) of the Protocol, or both, as the case may
be.
(2) Where this Act refers to the application of the Agreement or the Protocol, it shall be
construed as meaning also the application of the Common Regulations under the Agreement and
the Protocol.
(3) Unless otherwise provided in the Agreement or the Protocol, the provisions of this Act
shall apply to international trade mark applications with the exceptions laid down in this Part
(Chapters X/B to X/D).
(4) [repealed]
Chapter X/C
INTERNATIONAL TRADE MARK APPLICATIONS FILED UNDER THE AGREEMENT
Applications filed through the intermediary of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office
Article 76/J
(1) The holder of a trade mark registered by the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office may
file under the Agreement an international trade mark application through the Hungarian
Intellectual Property Office as Office of origin.
(2) The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall forward the international trade mark
application with respect to which the applicant:
(a) has a real and effective industrial or commercial establishment in the country; or failing
this
(b) has his domicile in the country; or failing this
(c) is of Hungarian nationality.
(3) The international trade mark application shall be filed with the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office as Office of origin in compliance with the formal requirements, in the manner and
in the language prescribed by the Agreement.
(4) If the international trade mark application is filed before the registration of the trade
mark referred to in paragraph (1), the date of registration of the trade mark shall be considered as
date of filing.
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
40
(5) At the invitation of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office the applicant shall certify
that he is entitled to file an international trade mark application under paragraph (2). Failing to
comply with the said invitation, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall refuse the request
to forward the international application.
Article 76/K
(1) Prior to forwarding the international trade mark application, the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office shall examine:
(a) whether the application contains the registration number of the trade mark referred to in
Article 76/J(1);
(b) whether the application contains a request to forward the international application,
information identifying the applicant, a representation of the sign and a list of goods or services;
(c) whether the data of the application are in compliance with the data of the trade mark
referred to in Article 76/J(1) as appearing in the Trade Mark Register;
(d) whether the application contains designation of the countries to the territory of which the
extension of protection is claimed;
(e) whether the application has been filed in the language and in the manner prescribed by
the Agreement;
(f) whether the application is signed by the applicant or the representative.
(2) Where the application does not comply with the requirements of paragraph (1)(a) to (c)
and (f) – except for the case when the list of goods or services of the application is narrower than
the list of goods or services of the trade mark referred to in Article 76/J(1) – the Hungarian
Intellectual Property Office shall invite the applicant to rectify the irregularities. The applicant shall
be notified that if the application is not received by the International Bureau within two months
following the filing of the request, the date of the international registration shall not be the date of
the filing of the request, but the date of the receipt of the international application by the
International Bureau.
(3) Where the invitation to rectify the irregularities under paragraph (1) has no result, the
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall refuse the request to forward the international trade
mark application.
(4) Where the application does not comply with the requirements of paragraph (1)(d) and
(e), the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall invite the applicant to rectify the irregularities.
Failing to comply with the said invitation, the application shall be forwarded to the International
Bureau as filed by the applicant.
Article 76/L
(1) For the forwarding of the international trade mark application a forwarding fee
determined by specific legislation shall be paid to the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office, and
in connection with the international application the international fee determined by the Agreement
shall be paid to the International Bureau.
(2) The forwarding fee referred to in paragraph (1) shall be due on the date of filing of the
international trade mark application. If the fee is not paid within one month following the due date,
the request to forward the international trade mark application shall be considered withdrawn.
(3) The international fee referred to in paragraph (1) shall be paid directly to the
International Bureau within the time limit and in the manner prescribed by the Agreement.
(4) In the case of international trade mark applications filed through the intermediary of the
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office the date and number of the international registration shall be
recorded in the Trade Mark Register.
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
41
Subsequent extension, through the intermediary of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office, of
protection resulting from the international registration
Article 76/M
(1) Where the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office is the Office of the Contracting State
of the holder of an international registration, a subsequent extension of the protection resulting
from the international registration may be requested through the intermediary of the Hungarian
Intellectual Property Office.
(2) The request for the subsequent extension of protection shall be filed in compliance with
the formal requirements, in the manner and language prescribed by the Agreement.
(3) Prior to forwarding the request for subsequent extension, the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office shall examine:
(a) whether the request contains a request to forward it and whether it is signed by the
holder or the representative;
(b) whether the request has been filed in the manner prescribed by the Agreement.
(4) Where the request for the subsequent extension of protection does not comply with the
requirements of paragraph (3)(a), the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall invite the
requesting party to rectify the irregularities. Failing to comply with the said invitation, the
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall refuse the said request.
(5) Where the request for the subsequent extension of protection does not comply with the
requirements of paragraph (3)(b), the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall invite the
requesting party to rectify the irregularities. Failing to comply with the said invitation, the request
for the subsequent extension of protection shall be forwarded to the International Bureau as filed by
the requesting party.
(6) The provisions of Article 76/L shall apply mutatis mutandis with respect to the request
for the subsequent extension of protection.
(7) The provisions of paragraphs (1) to (6) shall apply mutatis mutandis, if a request for
recordal, in the international register, of a change relating to the international trade mark
application or the protection resulting from the international registration is filed under the
Agreement through the intermediary of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office.
Applications designating Hungary
Article 76/N
(1) An application designating Hungary shall have the same effect as a trade mark
application duly filed with the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office from the date of the
international registration under Article 3(4) of the Agreement or of the subsequent extension of
protection resulting from the international registration under Article 3 ter
(2) of the Agreement.
(2) The international registration effected on the basis of an application designating
Hungary shall result in protection – from the date laid down in paragraph (1) to the same effect as
registration under Article 64 if the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office does not refuse, under
Article 5(1) and (2) of the Agreement, protection of the sign extended to Hungary or withdraws the
refusal.
(3) The provisions relating to applications designating Hungary shall apply mutatis
mutandis if subsequent extension, to Hungary, of protection resulting from the international
registration is requested.
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
42
(4) Following international registration on the basis of an application designating Hungary,
the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall make available for inspection its contents as
published and shall ensure access to the entries of the international register relating to the
application.
Article 76/O
(1) Publication of an application designating Hungary shall be made by publishing the
following data of the international trade mark application:
(a) the sign;
(b) the number of the international registration;
(c) the date of publication in the Gazette of the International Bureau and the issue of the
Gazette containing the publication.
(2) The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall publish the application designating
Hungary under paragraph (1) after notification of the international registration.
Article 76/P
(1) The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall draw up the search report under Article
60 and shall carry out the substantive examination under Article 61 with respect to the application
designating Hungary.
(2) The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall send the search report to the applicant
through the intermediary of the International Bureau.
(3) For the purposes of Article 61/B(1), the time limit of opposition relating to an
application designating Hungary shall be reckoned from the date of publication under Article
76/O(1).
(4) If the international trade mark application does not meet the requirements examined
under Article 61(2), or an opposition has been filed against it, the International Bureau shall be
notified in the manner and within the time limit laid down by the Agreement (provisional refusal).
In the notification a time limit of at least three months shall be fixed for submitting comments,
which can be extended upon a request filed before expiration.
(5) Where the applicant does not reply to the invitation within the fixed time limit, the
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall notify the International Bureau – except when
paragraph (5)(a) is applicable – that the protection of the trade mark extending to Hungary is
refused (final refusal), or that protection is only partially recognised by the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office. The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall send notifications to the
International Bureau after the decision on final refusal or on partial recognition of the protection
has become final. Where trade mark protection is recognised in part, the date of registration shall be
considered to be the date of the decision.
(5a) Where the applicant does not reply, within the fixed time limit, to an invitation issued
by the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office solely on the basis of an opposition, the Hungarian
Intellectual Property Office shall decide on the registration of the trade mark on the basis of the
available information, and shall notify the International Bureau accordingly, sending either a
notification on the final refusal or a notification made in accordance with paragraph (5)(e).
(5b) Where the applicant replies to the invitation, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office
shall continue the substantive examination and shall decide on the registration of the trade mark on
the basis thereof. If the trade mark application must be refused on the basis of the substantive
examination [Article 61(4), Article 61/H(2)], the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall notify
the International Bureau that the protection of the trade mark extending to Hungary is refused (final
refusal) after the decision on it has become final.
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
43
(5c) Where the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office does not issue any notice of
provisional refusal and sends no notification to the International Bureau on the basis of paragraph
(5d), either, the date of registration shall be considered to be the first day after the expiration of the
time limit prescribed for provisional refusal.
(5d) Where the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office finds before the expiration of the
time limit prescribed for provisional refusal that it is inadmissible to issue any provisional refusal, it
shall notify the International Bureau without delay of the recognition of the protection. The date of
registration shall be considered to be the date of the notification on the recognition of the
protection.
(5e) Where the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office withdraws the provisional refusal in
whole or in part after the substantive examination, it shall notify the International Bureau of the
recognition of the protection in whole or in part after the decision on withdrawal has become final.
The date of registration shall be considered to be the date of the decision on withdrawal.
(6)-(7) [repealed]
(8) By applying the provisions of Article 48 mutatis mutandis, the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office shall record in the Trade Mark Register that under Article 4 bis
of the Agreement the
international registration has replaced the trade mark registered by the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office.
Refusal of the effect of an assignment and of a licence contract
Article 76/R
(1) Where the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office considers that an assignment or a
licence contract recorded in the international register with respect to the protection resulting from
the international registration and extending to the territory of Hungary is contrary, in part or in
whole, to the provisions of this Act, it shall notify the applicant, through the intermediary of the
International Bureau, in the manner and within the time limit prescribed by the Agreement.
(2) The notification that the change shall have no effect shall indicate the reasons for and the
extent of refusal.
Invalidation of an international trade mark
Article 76/S
For the purposes of this Act, invalidation of an international trade mark referred to in Article
5(6) of the Agreement shall mean the cancellation of the trade mark and the revocation of trade
mark protection.
Supplementary Register
Article 76/T
The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall keep a Supplementary Register with
respect to applications designating Hungary, which shall contain all facts and circumstances that
cannot be recorded in the international register under the Agreement.
Chapter X/D
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
44
INTERNATIONAL TRADE MARK APPLICATIONS FILED UNDER THE PROTOCOL
Applications filed through the intermediary of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office
Article 76/U
(1) The applicant of a trade mark application filed with the Hungarian Intellectual Property
Office and the holder of a trade mark registered by the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office may
file under the Protocol an international trade mark application through the Hungarian
Intellectual Property Office as Office of origin.
(2) If the international trade mark application is filed before the registration of the trade
mark referred to in paragraph (1), the applicant may declare that he wishes to file the international
trade mark application on the basis of the trade mark referred to in paragraph (1). In this case the
date of registration of the trade mark shall be considered as the date of filing.
(3) The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall forward the international trade mark
application with respect to which the applicant:
(a) is of Hungarian nationality, or
(b) has his domicile in the country; or
(c) has a real and effective industrial or commercial establishment in the country.
(4) The international trade mark application shall be filed with the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office as Office of origin in compliance with the formal requirements, in the manner and
– at the option of the applicant – in one of the languages prescribed by the Protocol.
(5) The provisions of Article 76/J(5) and Articles 76/K to 76/M shall apply mutatis
mutandis to international trade mark applications filed under the Protocol, provided that any
reference to the Agreement shall be construed as a reference to the Protocol.
Application of provisions concerning international trade mark applications
filed under the Agreement
Article 76/V
The provisions of Articles 76/N to 76/T shall apply mutatis mutandis to international trade
mark applications filed under the Protocol, provided that any reference to the Agreement shall be
construed as a reference to the Protocol.
Transformation of an international registration into national application
Article 76/Z
(1) The request for transformation under Article 9 quinquies
of the Protocol shall be filed with
the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office within three months from the date on which the
international registration was cancelled.
(2) The Hungarian translation of the list of goods or services shall be filed within four
months following the filing of the request for transformation and the transformation fee amounting
to a proportion, determined by specific legislation, of the filing fee shall be paid within two months.
Failing to comply with these, the request for transformation shall be considered withdrawn.
(3) In any other matter pertaining to the request for transformation, the provisions of
Chapters VII to IX shall apply mutatis mutandis; if, however, the international registration is
cancelled after one of the dates of registration referred to in Article 76/P(5) and (5c)-(5e), the
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall register the trade mark without applying the provisions
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
45
of Articles 61 to 63. In this case, the date referred to in Article 76/P(5) and (5c)-(5e) shall be the
date of registration.
PART V
COURT PROCEEDINGS IN TRADE MARK MATTERS
Chapter XI
REVIEW OF DECISIONS OF THE HUNGARIAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE
Request for review
Article 77
(1) Upon request, the court may review the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office’s
(a) decisions referred to in Article 46/A(3);
(b) decisions suspending the procedure or furnishing a basis for entries in the Trade Mark
Register;
(c) orders excluding or limiting the inspection of files, against which independent legal
remedy is admissible under the provisions of Public Administration Procedures Act;
(d) orders denying persons the legal status as a party to the procedure apart from those who
have filed request for the commencement of a procedure;
(e) decisions imposing procedural fines or ruling on the amount and on the apportionment of
procedural costs.
(2) A request for review brought against a decision imposing procedural fine or ruling on
the amount and on the apportionment of procedural costs shall have no delaying force with respect
to any other provisions of the decision not contested in the request for review, and shall not prevent
them from becoming final.
(3) Any order of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office not referred to in paragraph (1)
may only be contested in a request for the review of the decisions referred to in paragraph (1).
(4) Review of a decision may be requested by:
(a) any party to the procedures before the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office;
(b) any person excluded from, or limited in, the inspection of files;
(c) any person whose legal status as a party to the procedure has been denied.
(5) Review of a ruling on the registration and cancellation of a trade mark may be requested
by the public prosecutor under Article 3(1)(a) and (b) and Article 3(2). Any other participant to the
procedures before the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office may file, in his own right, an
independent request for review of the decision or a provision thereof relating to him.
(6) The request for review must be filed or posted by registered mail, with the exceptions
laid down in paragraphs (7) and (8), within thirty days from the date of communication of the
decision to the party concerned or to any other participant to the procedure.
(7) The time limit of thirty days for the filing of a request for review shall be reckoned from
the communication of the order refusing, or considering not to have been filed, the request for
restitutio in integrum, if
(a) that date is later than the date of communication of the decision under paragraph (6), and
(b) the request for restitutio in integrum was filed to remedy an omission, which served
directly as a basis for the decision under paragraph (6).
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
46
(8) If the review of a decision of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office is requested on
the basis of a decision taken by the Constitutional Court under the provisions of the Public
Administration Procedures Act, the time limit for filing a request for review shall open again for
thirty days from the service of the decision of the Constitutional Court.
(9) The request for review shall be filed with the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office,
which shall forward it, together with the documents of the trade mark file, to the court within
fifteen days except for the case provided for in paragraph (10). Where an opposing party took part
in the procedure, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall simultaneously notify that party
of the forwarding of the request.
(10) If the request for review raises legal questions of fundamental importance, the
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office may make a written statement about that question and shall
forward it, together with the request for review and the documents of the trade mark file, to the
court within thirty days.
(11) The rules concerning actions shall apply mutatis mutandis to the requirements for a
request for review.
(12) In the case of a request for review filed late, the court shall decide on the request for
restitutio in integrum.
Jurisdiction and competence
Article 78
(1) In proceedings for the review of decisions taken by the Hungarian Intellectual Property
Office, the Metropolitan Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction and exclusive competence.
(2) The Metropolitan Court of Justice shall sit in a chamber consisting of three professional
judges.
(3) repealed
Rules governing proceedings concerning requests for review
Article 79
The court shall hear requests for the review of decisions taken by the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office in accordance with the rules of non-contentious civil procedure, subject to the
exceptions mentioned in this Act. Unless this Act or the non-contentious nature of the procedure
indicates otherwise, the rules of Act III of 1952 on the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter
referred to as “the Code of Civil Procedure”) shall apply to the proceedings mutatis mutandis.
Publicity
Article 80
The court may, at the request of a party, exclude the public from the hearing
notwithstanding the fact that the requirements prescribed in the general provisions of the Code of
Civil Procedure may not be fulfilled.
Exclusion
Article 81
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
47
(1) In addition to the cases determined in the general provisions of the Code of Civil
Procedure, the following persons shall be excluded from participating in the proceedings or from
acting as judges:
(a) persons who participated in taking the decision of the Hungarian Intellectual Property
Office;
(b) relatives, as defined in the general provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure relating to
the exclusion of judges, of a person mentioned under point(a), above.
(2) The provisions of paragraph (1) shall also apply to persons drawing up the minutes and
to experts.
Parties to the proceedings and other participants
Article 82
(1) The person who filed the request shall be a party to the court proceedings. The public
prosecutor instituting proceedings shall be entitled to all the rights to which a party is entitled,
except that he may not agree to a settlement, admit claims or waive any right.
(2) Where an opposing party has also taken part in the procedure before the Hungarian
Intellectual Property Office, the court proceedings shall be initiated against that party.
Article 83
Where a holder of a joint protection acts independently to maintain and protect trade mark
rights, or proceedings have been initiated against only one of the joint holders, the court shall notify
the other joint holders that they may join the proceedings.
Article 84
(1) Any person having a legal interest in the outcome of the proceedings for review of
decisions taken by the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office may intervene in the proceedings in
favour of the party whose interests he shares until the court decision becomes final.
(2) Save for settlement, admission of claims and waiver of rights, the intervenor may take
any action which the party he supports is entitled to take, except that his acts shall have effect only
where they do not conflict with the acts of the party concerned.
(3) Any legal dispute between the intervenor and the party concerned may not be decided in
the course of the proceedings.
Representation
Article 85
(1) Patent attorneys may also act as representatives in proceedings.
(2) As to the validity of a power of attorney given to a patent attorney or an attorney-at-law
either in the country or abroad, the signature by the principal shall be sufficient.
Costs of proceedings
Article 86
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
48
(1) Where an opposing party also takes part in the court proceedings, the provisions on
litigation costs shall apply mutatis mutandis to the advance and payment of the costs of
proceedings.
(2) In the absence of an opposing party, the applicant shall advance and meet the costs.
(3) The expenses and fees of the patent attorney representing the party shall be added to the
costs of proceedings.
Omission
Article 87
Where neither the applicant nor any of the parties appear at the hearing or where none of the
parties respond to the invitation of the court in the fixed time limit, the court shall decide on the
request on the basis of the material at its disposal.
Restitutio in integrum
Article 88
The provisions of Article 42 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the submission of a request for
restitutio in integrum in non-contentious proceedings.
Measures on the basis of the request
Article 88/A
If the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office has made a written statement concerning the
request for review [Article 77(10)], the chairman of the proceeding chamber shall inform the party
or parties of this statement in writing.
Hearing and taking of evidence
Article 89
(1) The court of first instance shall take evidence and shall hold its hearings in accordance
with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure.
(2) If no opposing party takes part in the proceedings and the case can be settled on the basis
of documentary evidence, the court may take a decision without a hearing, but the party shall be
heard at his request.
(3) Should the court consider the case without a hearing, but finds during the proceedings
that a hearing is necessary, it may at any time order such hearing. However, where the court
considers the case at a hearing, or has ordered a hearing, it may not revoke such order and consider
the case without a hearing.
(4) Settlement may not be reached in the court proceedings if such settlement was not
admissible in the procedure before the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office.
Decisions
Article 90
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
49
The court shall decide both on the merits of a case and on other matters by an order.
Article 91
(1) If the court alters a decision taken in a trade mark case, its order shall replace the
decision of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office. In place of reviewing the decision in a trade
mark matter the court shall repeal the decision and order the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office
to continue the procedure if the request for review was filed against a decision refusing,
withdrawing or considering withdrawn a trade mark application, in the absence of which
continuation of the registration procedure at the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office would have
been admissible.
(2) The court shall repeal the decision and order the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office
to start a new procedure if
(a) the decision was taken with the participation of a person who could be objected to on the
grounds of exclusion;
(b) substantive rules of procedure were infringed during the procedure before the Hungarian
Intellectual Property Office which cannot be remedied by the court.
(c) [repealed]
(3) Where a party requests a court decision on a matter, which was not the subject of the
procedure before the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office, the court shall refer the request to the
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office, except when, in the case of opposition, the Hungarian
Intellectual Property Office left the ground for opposition out of consideration under Article
61/D(8), in the cancellation procedure, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office left the ground
for cancellation out of consideration under paragraph 73(1) or when the new ground for opposition
or cancellation was stated in the request for review or after the filing thereof; such ground for
opposition or cancellation shall be left out of consideration by the court. In the case of the referral
of the request the court shall, if necessary, repeal the decision of the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office.
(4) The court shall leave out of consideration any facts, allegations or evidence submitted by
the party in the request for review or after the filing thereof, which the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office – in compliance with Article 40(3) – duly left out of consideration in the procedure
before it.
(5) Where, after the filing of a request for review, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office
withdraws any of its decisions referred to in Article 77(1)(b) to (d), the court shall terminate the
proceedings. If the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office has altered its decision, the court
proceedings may only continue in respect of matters still pending.
Article 92
The court order on the merits of a case shall be communicated by service, it shall not be
considered published by the pronouncement thereof. If the court decides on the request for review
at a hearing, the order on the merits of the case shall be pronounced also on the day of the hearing.
The pronouncement may be deferred – for not more than eight days – only in the event if it is
indispensable because of the complexity of the case. In such a case the time limit for
pronouncement shall be fixed immediately and the judgment shall be put into writing until the day
of pronouncement.
Article 93
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
50
In deciding on the appeal filed against the Metropolitan Court of Justice’s decision, the
provisions of Article 257 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall apply mutatis mutandis, with the
proviso that in the case of a request to this effect the court of second instance shall also hear the
parties orally, except when the appeal was filed against an order on a request for review filed
against a decision of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office referred to in Article 77(1)(c) and
(d).
Article 94
[repealed]
Chapter XII
TRADE MARK LITIGATION
Rules governing trade mark litigation
Article 95
(1) The Metropolitan Court of Justice shall have exclusive competence in court proceedings
on trade mark infringement, the prohibition of the use of a trade mark by the representative or the
agent under Article 14 or the assignment of the right to trade mark protection or of the trade mark
protection under Article 19(5) as well as the prohibition of the use of Community trade marks
under Articles 110 and 111 and Article 165(5) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation Article
76/A(a). In such proceedings, the chamber of the Metropolitan Court of Justice shall be composed
as laid down in Article 78(2).
(2) In court proceedings on trade mark infringement, provisional measures – until the
contrary is rendered probable – shall be considered necessary to protect the plaintiff’s rights
deserving specific appreciation if the plaintiff proves that the trade mark is protected, and he is the
holder of the trade mark or a user entitled to institute proceedings for infringement in his own
name.
(3) Paragraph (2) shall not apply where six months have already elapsed from the beginning
of trade mark infringement or 60 days from the date on which the plaintiff became aware of the
infringement and of the identity of the infringer.
(4) In the case of trade mark infringement, the request for provisional measures may also be
filed before initiating an action; the Metropolitan Court of Justice shall decide on the request in a
non-contentious procedure. With the exceptions deriving from the particular features of non-
contentious procedures, the provisions of this Act and the general rules of the Code of Civil
Procedure shall apply mutatis mutandis to the non-contentious procedure for provisional measures.
If the plaintiff has initiated an action for trade mark infringement in accordance with paragraph (8),
the amount exceeding the fee paid in the non-contentious procedure shall be paid as fee for the
action.
(5) In addition to civil remedies applicable in the case of infringement, the holder may
request the court, on conditions relating to provisional measures, to
(a) order precautionary measures in accordance with the provisions of the Act on Judicial
Execution, if he demonstrates circumstances likely to endanger the later satisfaction of his claim for
damages or for the surrender of the enrichment obtained by infringement;
(b) compel the infringer to communicate or present his banking, financial or commercial
documents with a view to ordering the precautionary measures in accordance with point (a);
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
51
(c) order the lodging of security, if in place of demanding discontinuance of the trade mark
infringement, the holder consents to the continuation, by the infringer, of the allegedly infringing
activity.
(6) The court may order the lodging of security under paragraph (5)(c) even in the absence
of a request of the holder to this effect, provided that the holder filed a request for the
discontinuance of infringement, which the court does not allow.
(7) The court shall decide on the provisional measures out of turn, within fifteen days from
the filing of a request to this effect at the latest. The court of second instance shall decide on the
appeal filed against the decision on the provisional measures out of turn, within fifteen days from
the filing of the appeal at the latest.
(8) At the request of the defendant, the court shall annul its decision on provisional
measures – including paragraphs (5) and (6) as well – requested before the initiation of an action, if
the holder has not instituted, within fifteen days from the communication of such decision,
proceedings for trade mark infringement with respect to the claim enforced by the provisional
measures. The court shall decide on the request for annulling the provisional measures out of turn,
within fifteen days from the filing of the request at the latest.
(9) Where, in the course of proceedings for trade mark infringement, one of the parties has
already produced reasonably available evidence, the court may, at the request of the party
producing the evidence, require the defendant to
(a) present the documents and other exhibits in his possession and to make inspection
possible;
(b) communicate or present his banking, financial or commercial documents.
(10) Preliminary production of evidence shall also be admissible before instituting
proceedings if the holder has made the fact or danger of trade mark infringement likely to a
reasonable extent. If the proceedings have not yet started, preliminary production of evidence shall
be requested at the Metropolitan Court of Justice. Preliminary evidence shall be taken by the
Metropolitan Court of Justice. Against decisions ordering preliminary production of evidence
appeals shall be admissible.
(11) At the request of the defendant, the court shall annul its decision ordering preliminary
production of evidence, if the holder has not instituted proceedings for trade mark infringement
within fifteen days from the communication of the decision ordering preliminary production of
evidence. The court shall decide on the request for annulling preliminary production of evidence
out of turn, within fifteen days from the filing of the request at the latest.
(12) Where any delay would cause irreparable harm, it shall be regarded as a case of
extreme urgency and – taking this into account – provisional measures, including paragraphs (5)
and (6) as well, may be taken without the defendant having been heard. Where any delay would
cause irreparable harm, or the risk of the destruction of evidence is likely, it shall be regarded as an
urgent case and – taking this into account – preliminary evidence may be taken without the
defendant having been heard. Decisions taken without the defendant having been heard shall be
communicated to the defendant on execution. After communication of the decision, the defendant
may request to be heard, the review or the annulment of the decision ordering provisional measures
or the preliminary production of evidence.
(13) The court may subject the ordering of preliminary production of evidence and – with
the exception of paragraph (5)(c) and paragraph (6) – of provisional measures to the lodging of
security.
(14) If, in the cases referred to in paragraph (5)(c), paragraph (6) and paragraph (13), the
party entitled to compensation from the amount of the security does not enforce his claim within
three months from the date on which the decision annulling a decision on the preliminary
production of evidence or provisional measures or the judgment on the discontinuance of
proceedings took effect, the depositor may demand refund of the security.
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
52
(14a) In court proceedings on trade mark infringement the legal consequences laid down in
Articles 27(2) and (3) shall not apply in respect of the period when the grounds for revocation of
trade mark protection existed based on this Law, provided that the defendant refers to this fact in
his defense as to the merits.
(15) Any other trade mark litigation not mentioned under paragraph (1) shall be heard by
the court of justice.
(16) The general provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure shall apply in the court
proceedings referred to in paragraphs (1) and (15), with the exceptions laid down in Articles 80, 85
and 86(3) of this Act.
PART VI
COLLECTIVE MARKS AND CERTIFICATION MARKS
Chapter XIII
COLLECTIVE MARKS
Collective marks
Article 96
(1) Collective marks are trade marks that are capable of distinguishing goods or services of
the members of an association, public body or union (hereinafter referred to together as
"association") from the goods or services of other undertakings according to the quality, origin or
other characteristics of goods or services bearing the collective mark.
(2) [repealed]
(3) A sign shall be excluded from trade mark protection as a collective mark:
(a) if the public is liable to be misled as regards the character or the significance of the
mark, in particular if it is likely to be perceived as other than a collective mark;
(b) if the regulations governing its use contain provisions contrary to public policy, accepted
principles of morality or law.
(4) The right to the protection of a collective mark shall belong to the association, whose
members shall also be entitled to use the collective mark.
(5) [repealed]
(6) The use of a collective mark by any member of the association shall also be deemed to
constitute use within the meaning of Article 18.
Regulations governing the use of collective marks
Article 97
(1) A sign shall be granted protection as a collective mark if its use is governed by
regulation complying with the requirements laid down in paragraph (2). The regulation shall be
established by the association being the holder of the collective mark.
(2) The regulation shall include:
(a) the name and the registered seat of the association,
(b) information on the members authorized to use the mark, including their names,
addresses and registered seats,
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
53
(c) the conditions of membership,
(d) the conditions of the use of the collective mark,
(e) the provisions relating to the control of the use of the collective mark,
(f) the order of proceedings against unauthorized use of the collective mark.
(3) [repealed]
(4) The application for a collective mark shall contain the regulation. With respect to
collective marks, the data indicated in paragraph 2(b) shall also be recorded in the Trade Mark
Register. The regulation and the amendments pursuant to paragraph (5) thereof shall be attached to
the entry in the register relating to the collective mark.
(5) In case of any change to the data indicated in the regulation, the holder of a collective
mark shall submit an amended regulation to the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office.
Amendments to the regulation shall take effect only from the entry in the Trade Mark Register. The
amendment shall not be entered in the Register if
(a) the amended regulation does not satisfy the requirements in paragraph (2);
(b) due to the amendment the requirements prescribed in Article 96(1) would not be met; or
(b) it would involve one of the grounds for refusal referred to in Article 96(3).
Assignment of the protection of collective marks
Article 98
(1) Assignment of the protection of collective marks shall require the relevant written
contract and the recording in the Trade Mark Register of the succession in title.
(2) The protection of collective marks may not be assigned if after the assignment the
requirements prescribed in Article 96 are not satisfied or the sign becomes excluded from
protection as a collective mark.
Lapse of protection of collective marks
Article 99
(1)–(2) [repealed]
(3) The protection of collective marks shall also lapse – on the day indicated in the decision
on lapse – where the holder does not take the necessary action in order to stop the use of the
collective mark contrary to the regulations.
(4) Where a sign may not be granted protection as collective mark under Article 96(3), the
collective mark shall be cancelled. If a sign becomes excluded from protection under Article 96(3),
lapse of the protection of the collective mark shall be declared with retroactive effect to the filing
date of the request for a decision on lapse.
Enforcement of rights conferred by the protection of collective marks
Article 100
Persons who are authorized to use the collective mark by reason of their membership may
bring an action against an infringer only with the consent of the holder; they may, however,
intervene in the proceedings instituted by the holder.
Chapter XIV
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
54
CERTIFICATION MARKS
Certification marks
Article 101
(1) Certification marks are trade marks that distinguish goods or services of specified
quality or of other characteristics from other goods or services by attesting to such quality or
characteristic.
(2) Protection of certification marks may not be obtained by:
(a) an undertaking which produces, puts on the market or imports the goods or supplies the
services for which the trade mark is registered;
(b) an undertaking which – pursuant to the Act on the Prohibition of Unfair and Restrictive
Market Practices – is not independent of the undertaking under point(a);
(c) an undertaking with which the undertaking under point(a) is in a permanent legal
relationship in respect of the goods or services for which the mark is registered.
(3) The holder himself may not use the certification mark for the purpose of certification, he
shall, however, authorize its use for such purpose with respect to the goods or services complying
with the prescribed quality requirements or with other characteristics.
(4) A certification mark shall be granted protection if it is accompanied by regulation
satisfying the requirements prescribed under paragraph (5).
(5) The regulation shall include:
(a) the name and registered seat of the holder,
(b) the quality requirements relating to the goods or services for which the mark is
registered,
(c) the rules of attesting the quality,
(d) the conditions of the use of the mark,
(e) the provisions relating to the control of the use of the mark,
(f) the order of proceedings against unauthorized use of the mark.
(6) For the regulation, application and registration, the use and assignment of the
certification mark, for the lapse of the protection of the certification mark and for the enforcement
of rights deriving from the protection of such marks, the provisions relating to collective trade
marks and to their protection shall apply mutatis mutandis.
(7) A certification mark shall also be cancelled if the application was filed by a person not
entitled to it under paragraph (2).
(8) For the use of certification marks, the provisions of specific legislation on the
certification of quality or of other characteristics shall also apply.
Chapter XV
APPLICATION OF PROVISIONS RELATING TO TRADE MARKS TO COLLECTIVE AND
CERTIFICATION MARKS
Application of provisions relating to trade marks
Article 102
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
55
Matters relating to collective and certification marks and to their protection that are not
covered by this part shall be governed by the provisions relating to trade marks and to their
protection, provided that observations may also be filed with respect to the grounds referred to in
Article 96(3).
PART VII
PROTECTION OF GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS
Chapter XVI
SUBJECT MATTER OF PROTECTION, RIGHTS CONFERRED, INFRINGEMENT AND
LAPSE OF PROTECTION
Geographical indications and appellations of origin capable of protection
Article 103
(1) Geographical indications and appellations of origin which are used in the course of trade
to identify the geographical origin of a product shall be granted protection as geographical
indications.
(2) Geographical indication means the geographical name of a region, locality or, in
exceptional cases, a country which serves to designate a product originating therein the specific
quality, reputation or other characteristics of which are due essentially to that geographical origin,
and the production, processing or preparation of which takes place in the defined geographical area.
(3) Appellation of origin means the geographical name of a region, locality or, in
exceptional cases, a country which serves to designate a product originating therein the specific
quality, reputation or other characteristics of which are due exclusively or essentially to the
geographical environment, with its inherent natural and human factors, and the production,
processing and preparation of which take place in the defined geographical area.
Article 104
Geographical indications of spirit drinks shall be granted protection if the products bearing
the geographical indications comply also with the conditions specified in the product specification
provided for by specific legislation.
Grounds for refusal
Article 105
(1) A geographical indication may not be granted protection if in the course of trade it has
become the common name of a product irrespective of whether the product originates in the place
specified by the geographical indication.
(2) After its registration, a geographical indication may not become the common name of a
product in the course of trade.
Article 106
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
56
(1) A geographical indication shall be excluded from protection:
(a) with respect to identical products, if it is identical with an earlier geographical
indication;
(b) with respect to identical or similar products, if it is identical with or similar to an earlier
geographical indication;
(c) if it is identical with or similar to an earlier trade mark and its use – due to the
reputation, renown or lasting presence on the market of the trade mark – would result in a
likelihood of confusion on the part of public.
(2) A geographical indication may not be granted protection if it conflicts with the name of
an earlier – protected or other – plant variety or animal breed and as a result is likely to mislead the
public as to the origin of the product.
Registrability, right to protection
Article 107
(1) Protection shall be granted for a geographical indication if:
(a) it satisfies the requirements of Articles 103 and 104 and is not excluded from protection
under Articles 105 and 106 and
(b) the application complies with the requirements laid down by this Act.
(2) Any natural or legal person or a company without legal personality may apply for the
protection of a geographical indication which produces, processes or prepares, in the defined
geographical area, a product for which the designation of the geographical indication is used.
(3) The protection of a geographical indication shall belong jointly to the persons who
produce, process or prepare products in accordance with paragraph (2) (hereinafter referred to as
"holders").
(4) Foreigners shall be entitled to the protection of a geographical indication only on the
basis of an international agreement or subject to reciprocity. In matter of reciprocity, the opinion of
the President of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall be decisive.
Establishment and term of protection
Article 108
(1) Protection of the geographical indication shall begin with registration and shall be
effective retroactively from the date of filing of the application.
(2) Protection of geographical indications shall be unlimited in time.
Rights conferred by protection
Article 109
(1) Protection shall confer on its holders the exclusive right to use the geographical
indication. Only the holders may use the geographical indication, they may not license the right of
use.
(2) On the basis of the exclusive right of use, any of the holders shall be entitled to prevent
any person who, in the course of trade:
(a) uses the protected geographical indication or a denomination liable to create confusion
with respect to products not originating in the defined geographical area;
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
57
(b) uses the protected geographical indication with respect to products not included in the
list of products, but similar to those and therefore takes unfair advantage of or infringes the repute
of the protected geographical indication.
(c) imitates or evokes in any manner whatsoever the protected geographical indication, even
if the true origin of the product is indicated or if the protected name is translated or accompanied by
various additions;
(d) uses any false or misleading indication as to the provenance, origin, nature or essential
characteristics of the product, no matter where it is indicated (e.g. on the packaging, advertising
material or documents relating to the product concerned);
(e) performs any other act liable to mislead the public as to the true origin of the product.
Infringement of protection
Article 110
(1) Any person who unlawfully uses a protected geographical indication in contravention of
the provisions of Article 109, commits an infringement.
(2) Any one of the holders may also institute proceedings for infringement individually.
Proceedings for infringement may also be instituted by interest groups of the holders and by
organizations for the protection of consumers.
(3) For the civil remedies available against the infringer, the provisions of Article 27, and
for the customs law consequences of infringement, the provisions of Article 28 shall apply mutatis
mutandis.
Lapse of protection
Article 111
(1) Protection of a geographical indication shall lapse:
(a) if the protection is cancelled, with retroactive effect to the date of filing of the
application;
(b) if the holders have violated the requirements laid down in the product specification, with
retroactive effect to the starting date of the procedure for revocation.
(2) The protection shall be cancelled if the geographical indication does not satisfy the
requirements laid down in Article 107(1)(a).
(3) The protection of a geographical indication of spirit drinks shall be revoked if the
designated inspection authority establishes serious defects, in relation to the product specification,
in the use of the geographical indication, which cannot be remedied in any other way.
(4) Should the request for cancellation or for revocation be refused by a final decision, a
new procedure for the cancellation, or for revocation of the same geographical indication on the
same grounds may not be instituted by any person.
Chapter XVII
PROCEDURES CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS
General provisions governing procedures before the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office
Article 112
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
58
(1) The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall have competence in the following
matters concerning geographical indications:
(a) registration of geographical indications;
(b) cancellation and revocation of protection;
(c) keeping the records of applications for the protection of geographical indications and of
registered geographical indications;
(d) official information on the protection of geographical indications.
(2) The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall also have competence in matters
concerning the application of provisions relating to the Union protection of certain geographical
indications and to the international registration of appellations of origins (Chapters XVII/A and
XVII/B).
(3) In cancellation procedures and in revocation procedures, the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office shall proceed and shall take a ruling at the hearing in the form of a board consisting
of three members.
(4) The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office may withdraw or modify its decisions –
terminating the procedure – taken in the following matters only if a request for review is filed and
only until such request is transmitted to the court:
(a) registration of geographical indications;
(b) cancellation of geographical indications;
(c) revocation of protection;
(d) [repealed]
(e) forwarding of international applications for the registration of appellation of origins;
(f) final refusal of the protection of an appellation of origin registered by the International
Bureau designating Hungary.
(5) The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office may withdraw or modify its final decision –
terminating the procedure – taken in the matters referred to in paragraph (4)(b) and (c) on the basis
of a request for review only if it establishes that its decision is contrary to law or if the parties
request unanimously the modification or withdrawal.
(6) In any other matters in procedures before the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office, the
provisions of Chapters VII and VIII shall apply mutatis mutandis, except that in matters concerning
geographical indications a party to the procedure is not entitled to – except for the case under
paragraphs (7) and (8) – communicate with the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office in electronic
form in writing, and the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall not to be obliged to
communicate with the party in electronic form in writing.
(7) The following may also be filed in electronic form:
a) requests for an extract from the Register,
b) requests for the inspection of the files.
(8) If a party to the procedure initiated proceedings under paragraph (7) in electronic form
via the identification service provided by the Government, the Hungarian Intellectual Property
Office shall communicate to him its decisions in the procedure or send him certified extract from
the Register in electronic form.
(9) For filing the document defined in paragraph (7) in electronic form, Article 46/D(4)-(9)
shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Procedure for registration of geographical indications
Article 113
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
59
(1) The application for the registration of geographical indications shall contain a request
for registration, the name of the geographical indication, the list of products and the other
documents. Detailed formal requirements to be complied with by applications shall be laid down by
specific legislation.
(2) An application for the registration of a geographical indication shall be subject to the
payment of a filing fee determined by specific legislation; the fee shall be paid within two months
from the date of filing.
(3) If, either on filing or as a result of a rectification, an application for the registration of
geographical indications satisfies the requirements for according a date of filing, the Hungarian
Intellectual Property Office shall publish official information thereon in its official journal
(communication of data). Communication of data shall contain the following data:
(a) the name of the geographical indication;
(b) the date of filing;
(c) the list of products.
(4) After the communication of data in the procedure for the registration of a geographical
indication any person may file an observation with the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office to the
effect that the indication or the application does not comply with a requirement of registrability laid
down by this Act.
(5) If an application for the registration of a geographical indication satisfies the
requirements examined under Article 55, the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall carry out
a substantive examination of the application. The substantive examination shall assess:
(a) whether the geographical indication meets the requirements of Article 103 and whether
it is not excluded from protection under Articles 105 and 106; and
(b) whether the application complies with the requirements laid down by this Act.
(6) [repealed]
(7) In the procedure for the registration of geographical indications, in matters not regulated
in paragraphs (1) to (5), the provisions of Chapter IX shall apply mutatis mutandis, except that any
reference to the list of goods or services shall be construed as a reference to the list of products.
Article 113/A
(1) If the registration of a geographical indication of a spirit drink is requested in an
application for the registration of a geographical indication, the provisions of Article 113 shall
apply subject to the following exceptions:
(a) besides those specified in Article 113(1) the application for the registration of
geographical indications shall also contain the product specification provided for by specific
legislation;
(b) the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall carry out the examination on filing
(Articles 55 and 56) and the examination as to formal requirements (Article 59) out of turn;
(c) if the application satisfies the requirements examined under point (b), the Hungarian
Intellectual Property Office shall send the copies of the documents of the matter out of turn to the
minister responsible for agricultural policy (hereinafter referred to as the “Minister”);
(d) on the basis of the procedure followed under specific legislation for the examination of
product specifications, the Minister shall give a statement to the Hungarian Intellectual Property
Office within nine months from sending the documents pursuant to paragraph (c) whether he
agrees, with regard to the product specification, with the registration of the geographical indication;
the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office, sending simultaneously the decision, shall inform the
Minister that the decision on the registration of the geographical indication has become final;
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
60
(e) until the decision on the registration of the geographical indication becomes final the
applicant may submit comments to the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office whether he requests
Union protection for his geographical indication of spirit drinks.
(2) In the procedure for amendment of the product specification related to the registered
geographical indication of spirit drinks the provisions of paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis
mutandis.
Procedure for cancellation and for revocation
Article 114
For the procedure for cancellation of the protection of geographical indications, the
provisions of Articles 72 to 74, and for the procedure for revocation, the provisions of Articles 75
and 76 shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Court proceedings concerning protection of geographical indications
Article 115
In court proceedings concerning the protection of geographical indications, the provisions of
Chapters XI and XII shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Inspection of geographical indications of spirit drinks
Article 116
Inspection in accordance with the requirements under Article 104 of the use of geographical
indications of spirit drinks employed in the course of trade shall fall within the competence of the
authority designated by specific legislation.
PART VIII
PROVISIONS CONCERNING UNION PROTECTION OF CERTAIN GEOGRAPHICAL
INDICATIONS AND THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF APPELLATIONS OF
ORIGIN
Chapter XVII/A
PROVISIONS CONCERNING THE UNION PROTECTION OF GEOGRAPHICAL
INDICATIONS FOR AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS AND FOODSTUFFS, FOR VINE AND
WINE PRODUCTS AS WELL AS SPIRIT DRINKS
Article 116/A
(1) Union protection of geographical indications of agricultural products and foodstuffs
shall be governed by the provisions of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament
and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and
foodstuffs (hereinafter referred to as “Regulation 1151/2012/EU”).
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
61
(2) Union protection of geographical indications of vine and wine products shall be
governed by the provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007
establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain
agricultural products (hereinafter referred to as “Regulation 1234/2007/EC”).
(3) On the basis of Regulation 1151/2012/EU and Regulation 1234/2007/EC, the Minister
and the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall proceed in matters falling within the
competence of the Member States.
(4) Applications under Article 49 of Regulation 1151/2012/EU and Article 118c(1) of
Regulation 1234/2007/EC (for the purposes of this Chapter hereinafter together referred to as “the
application”) shall be filed with the Minister. Without delay the Minister shall forward the
application satisfying the requirements provided for by specific legislation to the Hungarian
Intellectual Property Office.
(5) The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall examine the application out of turn
whether it satisfies the following:
(a) the requirements of Articles 5 to 6 of Regulation 1151/2012/EU in the case of
agricultural products and foodstuffs;
(b) the requirements of Articles 118b, 118j and 118k of Regulation 1234/2007/EC in the
case of vine and wine products.
(6) The examination of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall not ascertain
whether the link exists
(a) between an agricultural product or a foodstuff and the geographical name, as laid down
in Article 5(1) and (2) of Regulation 1151/2012/EU;
(b) between a vine or wine product and the geographical name, as laid down in Article
118b(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation 1234/2007/EC.
(7) The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall give a statement to the Minister within
two months from the receipt of the application whether, on the basis of the requirements examined
under paragraph (5), it agrees with the forwarding of the application to the European Commission,
as laid down in paragraph (9).
(8) Following the statement of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office under paragraph
(7) and the detailed examination of the application as provided for by specific legislation, the
Minister shall publish the application in the official journal of the ministry headed by him.
Objections may be filed against the application within two months from the date of publication, as
laid down in Article 49(3) of Regulation 1151/2012/EU and Article 118f(3) and (4) of Regulation
1234/2007/EC. The Minister shall decide on the objection in its decision under paragraph (9), in
agreement with the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office if industrial property issues are
involved.
(9) The Minister shall decide within nine months from the filing of the application, in
conformity with the statement of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office and following its
detailed examination as laid down by specific legislation, whether the application complies with the
requirements laid down by this Act and by specific legislation. The Minister shall publish the
decision together with the product specification in the official journal of the ministry headed by
him. In the case of a final decision in favour of the applicant the Minister shall forward to the
European Commission the details and documents referred to in Article 8(2) of Regulation
1151/2012/EU or in Article 118f(5)(b) of Regulation 1234/2007/EC.
(10) The favourable decision under paragraph (9) shall give rise to transitional protection in
accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 9 of Regulation 1151/2012/EU and Article
118f(7) of Regulation 1234/2007/EC with effect from the date on which the application is filed
with the European Commission. The Minister shall notify the applicant of the date of the
establishment of transitional protection. An applicant whose geographical indication has been
granted transitional protection may also institute proceedings for infringement; however, the
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
62
proceedings shall be suspended until the decision of the European Commission on the application
has become final.
(11) The provisions of paragraphs (1) to (10) shall apply mutatis mutandis
(a) to applications for an amendment of the product specification filed under Article 53 of
Regulation 1151/2012/EU and to requests for cancellation filed under Article 54 in the case of
agricultural products and foodstuff;
(b) to applications for an amendment of the product specification filed under Article 118q of
Regulation 1234/2007/EC and to requests for cancellation filed under Article 118r in the case of
vine and wine products.
(12) The objection under the second subparagraph of Article 51(1) of Regulation
1151/2012/EU shall be filed with the Minister within four months from the date of publication in
the Official Journal of the European Union of the detail and document referred to in Article
50(2)(a) of Regulation 1151/2012/EU. The tasks of a Member State relating to objections shall be
performed by the Minister, in agreement with the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office if
industrial property issues are involved.
(13) The provisions of Articles 27 and 28 and Chapter XII shall apply mutatis mutandis
(a) where acts referred to in Article 13(1) of Regulation 1151/2012/EU are committed
which infringe Union protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for
agricultural products and foodstuffs or transitional protection provided for in paragraph (9);
(b) where acts referred to in Article 118m(2) of Regulation 1234/2007/EC are committed
which infringe Union protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for vine and
wine products or transitional protection provided for in paragraph (9).
Article 116/B
(1) Union protection of geographical indications of spirit drinks shall be governed by
Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2008
on the definition, description, presentation, labelling and the protection of geographical indications
of spirit drinks and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 1576/89 (hereinafter referred to as
“Regulation 110/2008/EC”). On the basis of Regulation 110/2008/EC the Minister shall proceed in
matters falling within the competence of the Member States.
(2) If the applicant has submitted comments under Article 113/A(1)(e) the Hungarian
Intellectual Property Office shall inform the Minister thereon in the notification under Article
113/A(1)(d). Failing to submit comments under Article 113/A(1)(e) the applicant may request the
carrying out of the procedure for the grant of Union protection of the geographical indication at any
time after the decision on the registration of the geographical indication of a spirit drink becomes
final; the request must be filed with the Minister. The Minister shall submit the application pursuant
to Article 17(1) of Regulation 110/2008/EC within sixty days from the notification of the
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office, or from the filing of the request of the right holder.
(3) In the case of the amendment pursuant to Article 113/A(2) of the product specification
relating to a geographical indication of spirit drinks under Union protection, the provisions of
paragraph (2) shall apply mutatis mutandis.
(4) where acts referred to in Article 16 of Regulation 110/2008/EC are committed which
infringe Union protection of geographical indications of spirit drinks, the provisions of Articles 27
and 28 and Chapter XII shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Article 116/C
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
63
(1) In issues not regulated in paragraphs 116/A and 116/B provisions of specific legislation
shall apply. This specific legislation may provide that the verification of compliance with the
product specification may also be ensured by the following bodies:
(a) in the case of agricultural products and foodstuffs the product certification bodies under
Article 37(1) of Regulation 1151/2012/EU;
(b) in the case of spirit drinks the product certification bodies under Article 22(1) of
Regulation 110/2008/EC;
(c) in the case of vine and wine products the product certification bodies under Article
118p(1) of Regulation 1234/2007/EC.
(2) Specific legislation referred to in paragraph (1)
(a) may provide conditions for the production and the putting on the market of agricultural
products and foodstuffs, spirit drinks, vine and wine products which are granted protection of
geographical indication, and
(b) may prohibit the use of a geographical indication.
(3) If the producer does not fulfil the condition laid down in paragraph (2)(a) or does not
comply with the prohibition under paragraph (2)(b) and continues to use the geographical
indication for a product which is not in compliance with the product specification, the producer
shall pay a fine, with an amount determined by specific legislation.
Chapter XVII/B
PROVISIONS CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
OF APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN
General provisions
Article 116/D
(1) For the purposes of this Act
(a) ’Application for the international registration of an appellation of origin’ (hereinafter
referred to as “international application”) means an application filed under the Lisbon Agreement
of October 31, 1958 for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration
(for the purposes of this part hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”);
(b) ‘International Bureau’ means the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property
Organization;
(c) ‘international register’ means the register maintained by the International Bureau, of
appellations of origin filed under the Agreement;
(d) ’Office of the country of origin’ means the competent Office of the country of origin
defined in Article 2(2) of the Agreement.
(2) Where this Act refers to the application of the Agreement, it shall be construed as
meaning also the application of the Regulations under the Agreement.
(3) Unless otherwise provided in the Agreement, the provisions of this Act shall apply
mutatis mutandis, to international applications with the exceptions laid down in this Chapter.
(4) [repealed]
Applications filed through the intermediary of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office
Article 116/E
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
64
(1) The holder of an appellation of origin registered by the Hungarian Intellectual Property
Office [Article 107(3)] may file an international application with the International Bureau through
the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office as Office of the country of origin.
(2) The international application shall be filed with the Hungarian Intellectual Property
Office as Office of the country of origin in compliance with the formal requirements, in the manner
and in the language prescribed by the Agreement.
(3) If the international application is filed before the registration of the appellation of origin
referred to in paragraph (1), the date of registration of the appellation of origin shall be considered
the date of filing.
Article 116/F
(1) Prior to forwarding the international application, the Hungarian Intellectual Property
Office shall examine:
(a) whether the application contains the indication of the country of origin, information
identifying the applicant, the appellation of origin, the list of products and the geographical area
belonging to the appellation of origin;
(b) whether the data of the application are in compliance with the data of the appellation of
origin referred to in Article 116/E(1) as appearing in the Register;
(c) whether the application has been filed in the language and in the manner prescribed by
the Agreement;
(d) whether the application is signed by the applicant or by the representative.
(2) Where the application does not comply with the requirements of paragraph (1), the
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall invite the applicant to rectify the irregularities. Failing
to comply with the said invitation, the application shall be forwarded to the International Bureau as
filed by the applicant.
Article 116/G
(1) For the forwarding of the international application a forwarding fee determined by
specific legislation shall be paid to the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office, and in connection
with the international application the international fee determined by the Agreement shall be paid to
the International Bureau.
(2) The forwarding fee referred to in paragraph (1) shall be due on the date of receiving the
international application. If the fee is not paid within one month following the due date, the request
to forward the international application shall be considered withdrawn.
(3) The international fee referred to in paragraph (1) shall be paid directly to the
International Bureau within the time limit and in the manner prescribed by the Agreement.
(4) In the case of international applications filed through the intermediary of the Hungarian
Intellectual Property Office, the date and number of the international registration shall be recorded
in the Register.
Article 116/H
The international protection of an appellation of origin shall lapse if the protection of the
underlying appellation of origin has lapsed.
International appellations of origin registered by the International Bureau
Article 116/I
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
65
(1) An international appellation of origin registered by the International Bureau shall have
the same effect from the date specified in Rule 7(1) of the Regulations under the Agreement as an
application for the registration of an appellation of origin duly filed with the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office.
(2) The international registration shall result in protection – from the date laid down in
paragraph (1) to the same effect as a registration by the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office if
the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office does not refuse, under Article 5(3) of the Agreement,
protection of the appellation of origin extended to Hungary or withdraws the refusal.
Article 116/J
(1) Following the notification of the international registration, the Hungarian Intellectual
Property Office shall publish official information on the international application in its official
journal (communication of data). The communication of data shall contain the following data:
(a) the name of the appellation of origin;
(b) the number of the international registration;
(c) the date of the international registration;
(d) the date of publication in the Gazette of the International Bureau and the issue of the
Gazette containing the publication.
(2) If the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office does not refuse, under Article 5(3) of the
Agreement, protection of the appellation of origin extended to Hungary or withdraws the refusal, it
shall publish official information thereon by indicating the data referred to in paragraph (1).
Article 116/K
(1) After the communication of data, any person may file an observation with the Hungarian
Intellectual Property Office to the effect that the appellation of origin constituting the subject matter
of the application or the application does not comply with a requirement of registrability laid down
by this Act.
(2) With respect to the international application registered by the International Bureau, the
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall draw up a search report under Article 60 and shall
carry out a substantive examination under Article 113(5).
(3) If the international application does not meet the requirements examined under Article
113(5), the International Bureau shall be notified in the manner and within the time limit laid down
by the Agreement (provisional refusal).
(4) Where the application shall be refused Article 61(4) or shall be considered withdrawn
Article 61(5), the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office shall notify the International Bureau that
the protection of the appellation of origin extending to Hungary is refused (final refusal).
(5) Where the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office does not issue any notice of
provisional refusal under paragraph (3), the date of registration shall be considered to be the first
day after the expiration of the time limit prescribed for provisional refusal.
(6) Where the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office finds before the expiration of the time
limit prescribed for provisional refusal that it is inadmissible to issue any provisional refusal, it
shall notify the International Bureau of the recognition of the protection. The date of registration
shall be considered to be the date of the notification on the recognition of the protection.
(7) Where the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office withdraws the provisional refusal in
whole or in part after the substantive examination, it shall notify the International Bureau of the
recognition of the protection after the decision on withdrawal has become final. The date of
registration shall be considered to be the date of the decision on withdrawal.
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
66
PART IX
FINAL PROVISIONS
Chapter XVIII
ENTRY INTO FORCE; TRANSITIONAL AND AMENDING PROVISIONS
Rules establishing provisions concerning the entry into force of this Act and transitional provisions
Article 117
(1) This Act shall enter into force on July 1, 1997; its provisions shall apply – with the
exceptions set out in paragraph (2) – only in procedures started after its entry into force.
(2) The provisions of Article 42 shall also apply mutatis mutandis to pending matters.
(3) Use of a trade mark before the entry into force of this Act shall be subject to the
previously applicable provisions with respect to the scope of trade mark protection, the concept of
the use of a trade mark and trade mark infringement.
(4) The time limits prescribed by this Act for legal consequences attached to acquiescence
and failing to use the trade mark shall begin on the day of entry into force at the earliest. On the
basis of the previously applicable provisions trade mark protection may also be revoked even if the
five years during which the trade mark has not been used in the country expires after the entry into
force of this Act.
(5) Article 76/P (5)-(5e) of this Act provided for by Act CXLVIII of 2010 on the necessary
amendments relating to Act XLII of 2010 on the listing of the ministries of the Republic of
Hungary and on the amendment of certain industrial property acts shall also be applicable to cases
already pending on 1 January 2011.
Article 118
(1) By way of derogation from Article 103(3), certain geographical names, traditionally
used for foodstuffs, shall be treated as appellations of origin even if the live animals, meat and milk
used as raw materials for the production of the foodstuffs concerned come from a geographical area
larger than or different from the processing area, provided that
(a) the breeding area may be determined,
(b) special conditions for the production of the raw materials exist and
(c) there are inspection arrangements to ensure that those conditions are adhered to.
(2) Protection of geographical indications of traditional foodstuffs under paragraph (1) may
be claimed within two years from the entry into force of this Act.
(3) By virtue of this Act, protection shall also be afforded to appellations of origin which
were recorded, before the entry into force of this Act, in the national Register kept under the Lisbon
Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration. These
appellations of origin shall be recorded in the Register of geographical indications and relevant
information shall be given in the official journal of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office.
Article 119
[repealed]
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
67
(1) In respect of
(a) the rights conferred by trade mark protection, the concept of the use of a trade mark and
– with the exception of the issue of exhaustion of rights – trade mark infringement, in case of the
use of a trade mark commenced before 1 May 2004, and to the extent of the use on 1 May 2004,
(b) the exhaustion of rights conferred by trade mark protection, in case of the use of a trade
mark realized before 1 May 2004
the provisions of this Act in force on 30 April 2004 shall be decisive.
(2) A Community trade mark as an earlier trade mark shall only be regarded as a relative
ground for refusal, if the trade mark application was filed with the Hungarian Intellectual Property
Office or the application designating Hungary has been filed with a filing date after 1 May 2004, or
the trade mark has been registered with such a filing date.
(3) The trade mark protection effective on 1 May 2004 and the trade mark protection
established with a filing date earlier and a registration date later than 1 May 2004, may be renewed
pursuant to the provisions of this Act.
(4) The provisions laid down in Article 91(1) effective from 1 January 2008 shall apply in
procedures pending on 1 January 2008.
(5) The provisions laid down in Article 3(2) effective from 1 August 2009 shall apply in
procedures pending on 1 August 2009.
Article 120
[repealed]
Authorizations
Article 121
(1) The Government shall be authorized to:
(a) establish by decree the detailed rules concerning electronic filing of trade mark
applications and requests for renewal;
(b) establish by decree the detailed rules concerning the procedure for the protection of
geographical indications of agricultural products and foodstuffs, spirit drinks as well as vine and
wine products, concerning the inspection of products and the procedural costs related thereto,
concerning the amounts of fines which may be imposed during inspection, and concerning the
filing of the product specification in the case of spirit drinks and vine and wine products which are
granted protection under Article 20 of Regulation 110/2008/EC and Article 118s of Regulation
1234/2007/EC, and concerning the conditions in question for putting the product on the market and
for production, as well as concerning the area of prohibition of the use of geographical indications
and to designate the inspection authority or authorities.
(2) The minister responsible for justice shall be authorized to establish by decree, in
consultation with the President of the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office and in agreement with
the minister exercising the rights of supervision over the Hungarian Intellectual Property Office, the
detailed formal requirements for trade mark applications and for applications for the protection of
geographical indications.
Compliance with the law of the European Union
Article 122
Act XI of 1997 on the protection of trade marks and geographical
indications
Consolidated text (25.10.2013)
68
(1) This Act serves compliance with the following acts of the European Union:
(a) Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004
on the enforcement of intellectual property rights;
(b) Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October
2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks.
(2) This Act lays down the rules required for implementing the following acts of the
European Union:
(a) Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade
mark;
(b) Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of
21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs;
(c) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1898/2006 of 14 December 2006 laying down detailed
rules of implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical
indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs.
(d) Chapter III of Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 of the European Parliament and of the
Council of 15 January 2008 on the definition, description, presentation, labelling and the protection
of geographical indications of spirit drinks and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 1576/89;
(e) Part II Title II Chapter I Section Ia of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of
22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific
provisions for certain agricultural products.