The Respondent is Ngo Minh Tuan, Viet Nam, self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with Mat Bao
Corporation (the “Registrar”).
3. ...D.B.A. Gestion Avanquest Canada) v. Ngo Minh Tuan
Case No. D2025-4112
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-11-25 - Informations relatives au litige
The Respondent is Keith Cummingham, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with
CloudFlare, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2026-02-11 - Informations relatives au litige
The Respondent is TicketCity, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Network Solutions, Inc. ...Interested parties encountering the domain name will therefore immediately interpret the word "tickets" as contained in said domain name to refer to some kind of ticket sales or issuing service available at the website identified by this domain name. ...
2004-04-06 - Informations relatives au litige
It is represented by its Registrar contact person Esko Haavisto.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name the subject of the dispute is .
The Registrar with which the domain name is registered is Register.com Inc of 575 Eighth Avenue, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10018, United States.
...Ascendes claims that the Respondent, whilst having a similar company name to the disputed domain, obtained the disputed domain name from its former owner Marketing Solutions Now Inc, a Roswell, Georgia, United States, corporation on May 8, 2001, after the disputed domain name was established. ...
2002-02-12 - Informations relatives au litige
Der Gesuchsgegner ist Guillermo Javier Sabina Rancel, Spanien.
2. Streitiger Domain-Namen
Gegenstand des Verfahrens ist der Domain-Name (nachfolgend der „Domain-
Name”).
...Gesuchsteller
Der Gesuchsteller macht geltend, er habe den streitigen Domain-Namen benutzt, um seine Werke
aufzuschalten. Ende 2024 sei er von einem Freund darauf hingewiesen worden, dass der streitige Domain-
Name auf eine Seite mit pornographischen Inhalten weitergeleitet wurde. ...
2025-06-30 - Informations relatives au litige
The Respondent is Frank Chapman / Eco Resorts llc, United States, represented by Chapman Law Firm
Co., LPA.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-01-20 - Informations relatives au litige
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Domain Name currently resolves to a blank page (at the time the Complaint was filed the Domain Name also resolved to a blank page). ...
2021-10-06 - Informations relatives au litige
Respondents
will be individually and collectively referred to as “Respondent”.
2. The Domain Names and Registrars
The disputed domain names , , (the “MAA
Domain Names”) are registered with Google LLC
The disputed domain name (the “Mega Domain name”) is registered with
Wix.com Ltd.
...Complainant operates a commercial website to promote its business via the domain name .
The disputed domain names were registered on March 4, 2023 (the MAA Domain Names) and March 5,
2023 (the Mega Domain Name). ...
2023-11-21 - Informations relatives au litige
The Respondent is Cane Krer, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with NameSilo, LLC
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the Disputed Domain Name be transferred to the Complainant.
/Michael D. Cover/
Michael D. Cover
Sole Panelist
Date: June 17, 2026
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
ENGIE v. ...
2026-06-26 - Informations relatives au litige
The Respondent is Nano Techan, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Redondo Aguilera
Sole Panelist
Date: March 24, 2025
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Ronica Holdings Ltd v. Nano Techan
Case No. D2025-0301
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-03-27 - Informations relatives au litige
The Respondent is Not disclosed, Zheijiang, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Key-Systems GmbH (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant notes that the disputed
domain name resolves to an inactive web page and that the non-use of the disputed domain name does not
qualify as use of the disputed domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services.
...
2024-01-09 - Informations relatives au litige
The Respondent is Khashayar Shahrivar Nia, Babyglobe of Spijkenisse, Netherlands.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the "Registrar").
3. ...On July 14, 2017, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain name. On July 16, 2017, the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response confirming:
(a) it is the Registrar for the disputed domain name;
(b) the registrant name and contact details for the disputed domain name;
(c) the Respondent became the registrant of the disputed domain name by at least December 6, 2016;
(d) the language of the registration agreement is English;
(e) the disputed domain name was registered subject to the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), and the UDRP applies to the disputed domain name.
...
2017-12-04 - Informations relatives au litige
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...See Rba Edipresse, S.L. v. Brendhan Hight / MDNH Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1580.
In the present case, the disputed domain name was registered on behalf of the Respondent in 2020, many years after the registrations of the Complainant’s CECIA mark in France. ...
2021-09-27 - Informations relatives au litige
The Complainant states that it has not authorised the Respondent to use the disputed domain name. Nor is the Respondent affiliated with it.
The disputed domain name includes in common with the Respondent corporation’s name the term “grand slam”. ...Burn World-Wide, Ltd. d/b/a BGT Partners v. Banta Global Turnkey Ltd.,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0470.
Generally speaking, a finding that a domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith requires an inference to be drawn that the respondent in question has registered and is using the disputed domain name to take advantage of its significance as a trademark owned by (usually) the complainant.
...
2020-07-08 - Informations relatives au litige
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Regarding the absence of the Respondents’ rights or legitimate interests, the Complainant argues that:
(i) it has not licensed or otherwise permitted the Respondents to use any of its trademarks or to register a domain name incorporating its IQOS and/or HEETS trademarks or a domain name which will be associated with these trademarks;
(ii) the Respondent is not making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain names, rather showing a clear intent to obtain an unfair commercial gain, with a view to misleadingly diverting consumers or to tarnish the trademarks owned by the Complainant;
(iii) the Respondent is not an authorized reseller of the Complainant’s IQOS system, being Internet users / relevant consumers misled regarding the relationship between the disputed domain names and the Complainant;
(iv) the criteria for a bona fide offering of goods or services as established in Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ...
2021-10-27 - Informations relatives au litige
The Respondent is John Newton, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. .../Georges Nahitchevansky/
Georges Nahitchevansky
Sole Panelist
Date: May 22, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
InCloud, LLC d/b/a Ontra v. John Newton
Case No. DAI2025-0011
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-05-30 - Informations relatives au litige
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...These are conjunctive requirements; both must be satisfied for a successful complaint: see e.g., Burn World-Wide, Ltd. d/b/a BGT Partners v. Banta Global Turnkey Ltd,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0470.
Generally speaking, a finding that a domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith requires an inference to be drawn that the respondent in question has registered and is using the disputed domain name to take advantage of its significance as a trademark owned by (usually) the complainant.
...
2017-10-25 - Informations relatives au litige
The Respondent is Withheld for Privacy Purposes of Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / Stanford Atoms, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Complainant has not provided the Respondent with a license or otherwise authorized the use of the CITI marks.
v. The Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name and has not acquired any legitimate trade mark rights in the disputed domain name.
...
2021-09-01 - Informations relatives au litige
Other UDRP panels “have repeatedly held that the addition of a generic word to a recognized mark creates a confusing similarity between the domain name and the mark of the [c]omplainant”. The Bank of Nova Scotia v. Whois Protection,
WIPO Case No. ...See also Valero Energy Corporation, Valero Marketing and Supply Company v. Domain Name Proxy, LLC, Navigation Catalyst Systems, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1227.
The Domain Names consist of the WYNN Mark, the dictionary terms “cash” or “play”, and various numbers. ...
2019-10-30 - Informations relatives au litige
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Anheuser-Busch InBev S.A. v. Domain Privacy, Domain Name Privacy Inc.
Case No. D2025-3277
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Anheuser-Busch InBev S.A., Belgium, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services
Group AB, Sweden.
The Respondent is Domain Privacy, Domain Name Privacy Inc., Cyprus.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Domains Inc. ...
2025-10-10 - Informations relatives au litige