关于知识产权 知识产权培训 树立尊重知识产权的风尚 知识产权外联 部门知识产权 知识产权和热点议题 特定领域知识产权 专利和技术信息 商标信息 外观设计信息 地理标志信息 植物品种信息(UPOV) 知识产权法律、条约和判决 知识产权资源 知识产权报告 专利保护 商标保护 外观设计保护 地理标志保护 植物品种保护(UPOV) 知识产权争议解决 知识产权局业务解决方案 知识产权服务缴费 谈判与决策 知识产权合作 创新支持 公私伙伴关系 组织简介 产权组织和人工智能 在产权组织任职 问责制 专利 商标 外观设计 地理标志 版权 商业秘密 知识产权的未来 WIPO学院 讲习班和研讨会 知识产权执法 WIPO ALERT 宣传 世界知识产权日 WIPO杂志 案例研究和成功故事 知识产权新闻 产权组织奖 企业 妇女 高校 土著人民 司法机构 青年 审查员 创新生态系统 经济学 金融 无形资产 全球卫生 气候变化 竞争政策 可持续发展目标 遗传资源、传统知识和传统文化表现形式 前沿技术 移动应用 体育 旅游 音乐 时尚 PATENTSCOPE 专利分析 国际专利分类 ARDI - 研究促进创新 ASPI - 专业化专利信息 全球品牌数据库 马德里监视器 Article 6ter Express数据库 尼斯分类 维也纳分类 全球外观设计数据库 国际外观设计公报 Hague Express数据库 洛迦诺分类 Lisbon Express数据库 全球品牌数据库地理标志信息 PLUTO植物品种数据库 GENIE数据库 产权组织管理的条约 WIPO Lex - 知识产权法律、条约和判决 产权组织标准 知识产权统计 WIPO Pearl(术语) 产权组织出版物 国家知识产权概况 产权组织知识中心 全球无形资产投资精要 产权组织技术趋势 全球创新指数 世界知识产权报告 PCT - 国际专利体系 ePCT 布达佩斯 - 国际微生物保藏体系 马德里 - 国际商标体系 eMadrid 第六条之三(徽章、旗帜、国徽) 海牙 - 国际外观设计体系 eHague 里斯本 - 国际地理标志体系 eLisbon UPOV PRISMA 调解 仲裁 专家裁决 域名争议 检索和审查集中式接入(CASE) 数字查询服务(DAS) WIPO Pay WIPO Wallet 产权组织各大会 常设委员会 会议日历 WIPO Webcast 产权组织正式文件 发展议程 定制化倡议与项目 合作论坛与对话 创新、创意和发展加速计划 知识产权影响力 国家知识产权和创新战略 合作枢纽 技术与创新支持中心(TISC) 技术转移 发明人援助计划(IAP) 人工智能基础设施交流 WIPO GREEN 产权组织的PAT-INFORMED 无障碍图书联合会 产权组织服务创作者 成员国 观察员 总干事 部门活动 驻外办事处 全球人工智能与知识产权论坛 人工智能基础设施交流 人工智能工具和服务 工作人员职位 附属人员职位 采购 成果和预算 财务报告 监督
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
法律 条约 判决 按管辖区浏览

刚果

CG003-j

返回

2026 WIPO IP Judges Forum Informal Case Summary – High Court of Brazzaville, Congo [2025]: Ministère Public and Société Inter Trade SARL v Houssein Adellahi, Aliou Niangadou, Aboudoulaye Teme, and Abdul Karim Haidara, Judgment No. 179

This is an informal case summary prepared for the purposes of facilitating exchange during the 2026 WIPO IP Judges Forum.

 

 

Session 9: Specialized Procedural Rules for IP Disputes

 

High Court of Brazzaville, Congo [2025]:  Ministère Public and Société Inter Trade SARL v Houssein Adellahi, Aliou Niangadou, Aboudoulaye Teme, and Abdul Karim Haidara, Judgment No. 179

 

Date of judgment: December 29, 2025

Issuing authority: High Court of Brazzaville

Level of the issuing authority: First Instance

Type of procedure: Judicial (Criminal)

Subject matter: Trademarks; IP Regulatory Body

Plaintiff/Appellant: Ministère Public; Société Inter Trade SARL

Defendant/Respondent: Houssein Adellahi; Aliou Niangadou; Aboudoulaye Teme; Abdul Karim Haidara

Keywords: Trademark infringement; Enforceability against third parties, African intellectual property organization (OAPI); OAPI special register of trademarks; Standing; Exclusive distribution agreement

 

Basic facts: Société Inter Trade SARL initiated direct criminal proceedings against four store managers (Houssein Adellahi, Aliou Niangadou, Aboudoulaye Teme, and Abdul Karim Haidara) operating in the Poto-poto and Total markets in Brazzaville, accusing them of unlawfully selling counterfeit products bearing the registered trademarks “Rapid Clair”, “Talangai”, and “Moby bébé”. Société Inter Trade SARL brought the action, acting in the capacity of owner of the said trademarks. However, official records from the African Intellectual Property Organization (OAPI) revealed that the registered owner of the trademarks was Mr. Francis Nana Djomou (General Manager of Laboratoires BIOPHARMA S.A.). Société Inter Trade SARL held an exclusive representation and distribution agreement for these products in Congo, but this agreement had never been recorded in the Special Register of Trademarks at OAPI nor published in the Official Bulletin.

 

Held: The High Court of Brazzaville declared the criminal prosecution inadmissible. The Court ruled that under Article 1(2°) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, criminal action can only be initiated by a party that has personally suffered direct harm caused by the alleged offense. Under Article 31 of Annex III of the Bangui Agreement, acts transferring rights or granting license/distribution rights are only enforceable against third parties if they have been duly recorded in the OAPI Special Register of Trademarks. Given that Société Inter Trade SARL failed to register its distribution agreement, the contract was not enforceable against third parties. Consequently, Société Inter Trade SARL could not claim legal ownership or standing based on direct harm, rendering its direct summons inadmissible. Société Inter Trade SARL was then ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings (100,000 Central African Francs).

 

Relevant holdings in relation to specialized procedural rules for intellectual property (IP) disputes:

·         Enforceability of Trademark Contracts against Third Parties: License or exclusive distribution contracts regarding registered trademarks must be recorded in the OAPI Special Register of Trademarks to be enforceable against third parties in judicial proceedings. 

 

·         Procedural Standing in Criminal IP Enforcement: A licensee or distributor whose contract is not recorded in the official IP register lacks legal standing to directly initiate criminal prosecution for trademark infringement, as they cannot legally establish direct damage in the capacity of owner or enforceable right holder.

 

·         Coordination of regional and national legal frameworks: The decision illustrates how a court in an OAPI member state applies the regional OAPI IP framework in conjunction with a national legal framework. In this case, the Court applied, as binding regional law, the provisions of the Bangui Agreement governing the registration, transfer, and enforceability of trademark rights within OAPI member states. At the same time, the Court applied the Congolese Code of Criminal Procedure to determine whether the plaintiff had standing to initiate criminal proceedings for trademark infringement.

                                                                                      

Relevant legislation: Articles 30 and 31 of Annex III of the Bangui Agreement (OAPI) (TRT/OA002/004); Articles 1(2°), 344, 408, 410, and 744 of the Congolese Code of Criminal Procedure.