关于知识产权 知识产权培训 树立尊重知识产权的风尚 知识产权外联 部门知识产权 知识产权和热点议题 特定领域知识产权 专利和技术信息 商标信息 工业品外观设计信息 地理标志信息 植物品种信息(UPOV) 知识产权法律、条约和判决 知识产权资源 知识产权报告 专利保护 商标保护 工业品外观设计保护 地理标志保护 植物品种保护(UPOV) 知识产权争议解决 知识产权局业务解决方案 知识产权服务缴费 谈判与决策 发展合作 创新支持 公私伙伴关系 人工智能工具和服务 组织简介 与产权组织合作 问责制 专利 商标 工业品外观设计 地理标志 版权 商业秘密 WIPO学院 讲习班和研讨会 知识产权执法 WIPO ALERT 宣传 世界知识产权日 WIPO杂志 案例研究和成功故事 知识产权新闻 产权组织奖 企业 高校 土著人民 司法机构 遗传资源、传统知识和传统文化表现形式 经济学 性别平等 全球卫生 气候变化 竞争政策 可持续发展目标 前沿技术 移动应用 体育 旅游 PATENTSCOPE 专利分析 国际专利分类 ARDI - 研究促进创新 ASPI - 专业化专利信息 全球品牌数据库 马德里监视器 Article 6ter Express数据库 尼斯分类 维也纳分类 全球外观设计数据库 国际外观设计公报 Hague Express数据库 洛迦诺分类 Lisbon Express数据库 全球品牌数据库地理标志信息 PLUTO植物品种数据库 GENIE数据库 产权组织管理的条约 WIPO Lex - 知识产权法律、条约和判决 产权组织标准 知识产权统计 WIPO Pearl(术语) 产权组织出版物 国家知识产权概况 产权组织知识中心 产权组织技术趋势 全球创新指数 世界知识产权报告 PCT - 国际专利体系 ePCT 布达佩斯 - 国际微生物保藏体系 马德里 - 国际商标体系 eMadrid 第六条之三(徽章、旗帜、国徽) 海牙 - 国际外观设计体系 eHague 里斯本 - 国际地理标志体系 eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange 调解 仲裁 专家裁决 域名争议 检索和审查集中式接入(CASE) 数字查询服务(DAS) WIPO Pay 产权组织往来账户 产权组织各大会 常设委员会 会议日历 WIPO Webcast 产权组织正式文件 发展议程 技术援助 知识产权培训机构 COVID-19支持 国家知识产权战略 政策和立法咨询 合作枢纽 技术与创新支持中心(TISC) 技术转移 发明人援助计划(IAP) WIPO GREEN 产权组织的PAT-INFORMED 无障碍图书联合会 产权组织服务创作者 WIPO Translate 语音转文字 分类助手 成员国 观察员 总干事 部门活动 驻外办事处 职位空缺 采购 成果和预算 财务报告 监督
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
法律 条约 判决书 按司法管辖区搜索

菲律宾

PH091

返回

Office Order No. 139, Series of 2004, Restoration of Cancelled Trademark Registrations

Office Order No. 139 Series of 2004 Restoration of Cancelled Trademark Registrations

In line with the ruling of the Director General on the request of ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corporation for the reversal of the actions of the Director of Trademarks canceling the various trademark registrations issued under R.A. No. 166 in favor of said corporation, the pertinent portions of which read, to wit:

"Rule 921 of the Trademarks Regulations specifically states that for registrations issued under R.A. No. 166, the declaration and affidavit of use shall be submitted only one year after the 10th and 15th anniversary for those with a remaining duration as of 01 January 1998 of 6½ years. The marks in contention have remaining duration as of 01 January 1998 of more than 6½ years. Therefore, the registrant is required to file the declaration and affidavit of use only after the 10th and 15th anniversaries of these registrations.

"Indeed, the Director of Trademarks may have overlooked the import of Rule

921. The rule does not presupposes that the affidavit of use had been filed within one year following the fifth anniversary considering that 6 ½ years had already lapsed. The period 6 ½ years is not the period that has lapsed but refers to the remaining duration of the term of the registration as of 01 January 1998. Since the term of registration under RA 166 is 20 years from registration, a remaining duration of more than 6 ½ years could be from 6 ½ years plus one day up to 20 years minus one day. This means that the period that has elapsed from registration up to 01 January 1998 may be from one day up to the maximum of thirteen and one-half (13 ½) years minus one day. Hence, this clearly shows that the rule does not presuppose that an affidavit of use had been filed within one year following the 5th anniversary.

"Accordingly, this Office finds merit in your request. In view thereof, the same is hereby granted"

The Director of Trademarks is hereby enjoined from canceling trademark registrations issued under RA No. 166 and subsisting as of 01 January 1998 on the ground of failure to file declaration and affidavit of use within one year from fifth anniversary. Accordingly, all such trademark registrations previously cancelled for non-filing of declaration and affidavit of use within one year from fifth anniversary is hereby restored. The Director of Trademarks, as well as the Director of the Administrative, Financial and Human Resource Development Services Bureau and its Patent, Trademark Administrative Services Division shall employ appropriate actions to implement this directive.

23 December 2004, Makati City.

(sgd.)EMMA C. FRANCISCO Director General