关于知识产权 知识产权培训 树立尊重知识产权的风尚 知识产权外联 部门知识产权 知识产权和热点议题 特定领域知识产权 专利和技术信息 商标信息 外观设计信息 地理标志信息 植物品种信息(UPOV) 知识产权法律、条约和判决 知识产权资源 知识产权报告 专利保护 商标保护 外观设计保护 地理标志保护 植物品种保护(UPOV) 知识产权争议解决 知识产权局业务解决方案 知识产权服务缴费 谈判与决策 发展合作 创新支持 公私伙伴关系 人工智能工具和服务 组织简介 在产权组织任职 问责制 专利 商标 外观设计 地理标志 版权 商业秘密 知识产权的未来 WIPO学院 讲习班和研讨会 知识产权执法 WIPO ALERT 宣传 世界知识产权日 WIPO杂志 案例研究和成功故事 知识产权新闻 产权组织奖 企业 高校 土著人民 司法机构 青年 审查员 创新生态系统 经济学 金融 无形资产 性别平等 全球卫生 气候变化 竞争政策 可持续发展目标 遗传资源、传统知识和传统文化表现形式 前沿技术 移动应用 体育 旅游 音乐 时尚 PATENTSCOPE 专利分析 国际专利分类 ARDI - 研究促进创新 ASPI - 专业化专利信息 全球品牌数据库 马德里监视器 Article 6ter Express数据库 尼斯分类 维也纳分类 全球外观设计数据库 国际外观设计公报 Hague Express数据库 洛迦诺分类 Lisbon Express数据库 全球品牌数据库地理标志信息 PLUTO植物品种数据库 GENIE数据库 产权组织管理的条约 WIPO Lex - 知识产权法律、条约和判决 产权组织标准 知识产权统计 WIPO Pearl(术语) 产权组织出版物 国家知识产权概况 产权组织知识中心 全球无形资产投资精要 产权组织技术趋势 全球创新指数 世界知识产权报告 PCT - 国际专利体系 ePCT 布达佩斯 - 国际微生物保藏体系 马德里 - 国际商标体系 eMadrid 第六条之三(徽章、旗帜、国徽) 海牙 - 国际外观设计体系 eHague 里斯本 - 国际地理标志体系 eLisbon UPOV PRISMA 调解 仲裁 专家裁决 域名争议 检索和审查集中式接入(CASE) 数字查询服务(DAS) WIPO Pay 产权组织往来账户 产权组织各大会 常设委员会 会议日历 WIPO Webcast 产权组织正式文件 发展议程 技术援助 知识产权培训机构 重建基金 国家知识产权战略 政策和立法咨询 合作枢纽 技术与创新支持中心(TISC) 技术转移 发明人援助计划(IAP) WIPO GREEN 产权组织的PAT-INFORMED 无障碍图书联合会 产权组织服务创作者 WIPO Translate 语音转文字 分类助手 成员国 观察员 总干事 部门活动 驻外办事处 工作人员职位 附属人员职位 采购 成果和预算 财务报告 监督
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
法律 条约 判决 按管辖区浏览

巴拿马

PA017-j

返回

2025 WIPO IP Judges Forum Informal Case Summary-Third Tribunal, First Judicial District of Panama [2025]: Entidad de Gestión Colectiva de Derechos de Productores Audiovisuales de Panamá (Egeda-Panamá) v Hotelera el Panamá, S.A., Case No. 08-08-01-10-3-79787

This is an informal case summary prepared for the purposes of facilitating exchange during the 2025 WIPO IP Judges Forum.

 

Session 5: Copyright Related Rights

 

Third Tribunal, First Judicial District of Panama [2025]: Entidad de Gestión Colectiva de Derechos de Productores Audiovisuales de Panamá (Egeda-Panamá) v Hotelera el Panamá, S.A., Case No. 08-08-01-10-3-79787

 

Date of judgment: July 28, 2025

Issuing authority: Third Tribunal, First Judicial District of Panama

Level of the issuing authority: Appellate Instance

Type of procedure: Judicial (Civil)

Subject matter: Copyright and Related Rights (Neighboring Rights)

Plaintiff: Entidad De Gestión Colectiva De Derechos De Productores Audiovisuales De Panamá (Egedapanamá)

Defendant: Hotelera el Panamá, S.A.

Keywords: copyright infringement, copyright related rights, audiovisual works, standing, legal presumption

 

Basic facts

 

The Court of First Instance ordered the cessation of the use of public communication devices and the making available of audiovisual works represented by the Entidad De Gestión Colectiva De Derechos De Productores Audiovisuales De Panamá (Egedapanamá) in a hotel, both in common areas and in guest rooms, and issued an abstract judgment since the amount was not proven. The amount was to be determined later through expert accounting evidence, applying the tariff approved by the National Copyright Office and a surcharge under the Law, taking into account the number of devices and televisions in the hotel.

 

The defendant appealed the decision, arguing that the Collective Management Entity cannot exercise economic rights on behalf of authors and that the Berne Convention excludes audiovisual producers from protection. It claimed these were related rights and the Collective Management Entity was required to prove ownership of the works. The appellant further argued in its appeal that the inventory of technological equipment was not sufficient to prove the infringement (public communication and making available to the public) or unlawful use, and therefore requested that the judgment be overturned.

 

Held:

 

The Court of Appeals recognized the legal standing of the Collective Management Entity of Audiovisual Producers’ Rights to bring lawsuits, based on its recognition by the National Copyright Office and the approval of general tariffs for users of audiovisual works, specifically in hotel accommodation services.

 

Relevant holdings in relation to Copyright Related Rights:

 

The Court explained that, in this case, the plaintiff manages audiovisual works (copyright) and not related rights, but that the purpose of the Collective Management Entity, regarding its operating rules and administrative and judicial actions, also applies to related rights. Furthermore, pursuant to Article 139 of the Panamanian Copyright Law, these entities benefit from a legal presumption in their favor, which the alleged infringer must rebut with evidence showing payment of the approved tariffs or authorization from the rights holders. The Court thus upheld the decision of the Court of First Instance.

                                                                                      

Relevant legislation: Panama Copyright Law, Berne Convention