关于知识产权 知识产权培训 树立尊重知识产权的风尚 知识产权外联 部门知识产权 知识产权和热点议题 特定领域知识产权 专利和技术信息 商标信息 工业品外观设计信息 地理标志信息 植物品种信息(UPOV) 知识产权法律、条约和判决 知识产权资源 知识产权报告 专利保护 商标保护 工业品外观设计保护 地理标志保护 植物品种保护(UPOV) 知识产权争议解决 知识产权局业务解决方案 知识产权服务缴费 谈判与决策 发展合作 创新支持 公私伙伴关系 人工智能工具和服务 组织简介 与产权组织合作 问责制 专利 商标 工业品外观设计 地理标志 版权 商业秘密 WIPO学院 讲习班和研讨会 知识产权执法 WIPO ALERT 宣传 世界知识产权日 WIPO杂志 案例研究和成功故事 知识产权新闻 产权组织奖 企业 高校 土著人民 司法机构 遗传资源、传统知识和传统文化表现形式 经济学 性别平等 全球卫生 气候变化 竞争政策 可持续发展目标 前沿技术 移动应用 体育 旅游 PATENTSCOPE 专利分析 国际专利分类 ARDI - 研究促进创新 ASPI - 专业化专利信息 全球品牌数据库 马德里监视器 Article 6ter Express数据库 尼斯分类 维也纳分类 全球外观设计数据库 国际外观设计公报 Hague Express数据库 洛迦诺分类 Lisbon Express数据库 全球品牌数据库地理标志信息 PLUTO植物品种数据库 GENIE数据库 产权组织管理的条约 WIPO Lex - 知识产权法律、条约和判决 产权组织标准 知识产权统计 WIPO Pearl(术语) 产权组织出版物 国家知识产权概况 产权组织知识中心 产权组织技术趋势 全球创新指数 世界知识产权报告 PCT - 国际专利体系 ePCT 布达佩斯 - 国际微生物保藏体系 马德里 - 国际商标体系 eMadrid 第六条之三(徽章、旗帜、国徽) 海牙 - 国际外观设计体系 eHague 里斯本 - 国际地理标志体系 eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange 调解 仲裁 专家裁决 域名争议 检索和审查集中式接入(CASE) 数字查询服务(DAS) WIPO Pay 产权组织往来账户 产权组织各大会 常设委员会 会议日历 WIPO Webcast 产权组织正式文件 发展议程 技术援助 知识产权培训机构 COVID-19支持 国家知识产权战略 政策和立法咨询 合作枢纽 技术与创新支持中心(TISC) 技术转移 发明人援助计划(IAP) WIPO GREEN 产权组织的PAT-INFORMED 无障碍图书联合会 产权组织服务创作者 WIPO Translate 语音转文字 分类助手 成员国 观察员 总干事 部门活动 驻外办事处 职位空缺 采购 成果和预算 财务报告 监督
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
法律 条约 判决书 按司法管辖区搜索

芬兰

FI085

返回

Act on Unfair Business Practices (Act No. 1061/1978 of December 22, 1978, as amended up to Act No. 461/2002 of July 1, 2002)


Unfair Business Practices Act 22.12.1978/1061 (Unofficial translation)

(Amendments up to 2002/461 included)

Section 1

Good business practice may not be violated nor may practices that are otherwise unfair to other entrepreneurs be used in business.

The commercial purpose of marketing and the party on whose behalf the marketing is done shall clearly appear from the marketing. (461/2002)

Section 2

A false or misleading expression concerning one’s own business or the business of another may not be used in business if the said expression is likely to affect the demand for or supply of a product or harm the business of another.

An expression that refers to irrelevant circumstances or that is presented or formulated in an unsuitable manner may not be used in business if the said expression is likely to harm the business of another.

The provisions of chapter 2, section 4a, of the Consumer Protection Act (38/1978) shall apply on comparative advertising in business. Furthermore, in comparing special offers, the validity of the offer shall be clearly indicated, and if the offer is valid only until stocks are exhausted, it shall be indicated. (1073/2000)

Section 3

A benefit that depends on a lottery or that is otherwise based on chance may not be promised in business if receipt of the benefit requires the sale, purchase or ordering of a product or otherwise requires consideration.

The provision in the first subsection shall not apply to prize contest tasks organised in newspapers and periodicals as customary entertainment.

If discounts, additional benefits or other specific benefits are offered in the marketing or if the marketing involves disposal by lottery, prize contests for the public or games, the conditions for receiving the benefits or for participating in the lottery, contest or game shall be stated in a clear and comprehensible manner and be easily accessible. (461/2002)

Section 4

No one may unjustifiably obtain or seek to obtain information regarding a business secret or use or reveal information obtained in such a manner.

Whoever obtains information regarding a business secret while in the service of an entrepreneur may not unjustifiably use or reveal it while still in service in order to obtain personal benefit or benefit for another or in order to harm another.

Whoever receives information regarding a business secret while performing a function on behalf of an entrepreneur, or who has been entrusted with a technical model or technical instructions so that he can carry out work or a function or otherwise for business purposes, may not unjustifiably use or reveal this.

Whoever has been informed by another of a business secret, a technical model or technical instructions in the knowledge that the said person has unjustifiable obtained or revealed the information may not use or reveal this.

Section 5 has been repealed (24.8.1990/810).

Section 6

An entrepreneur may be prohibited from continuing or repeating practices that violate sections 1 - 3. The prohibition may be reinforced through a conditional fine, unless this is unnecessary for a special reason.

If there is a special reason for this, the prohibition may also be directed at a person in the service of an entrepreneur referred to in the preceding first subsection, or at another person acting on his behalf.

An entrepreneur who in violation of section 4 has used the business secret, technical model or technical instructions of another or revealed any of these may be prohibited from continuing or repeating such practice. The prohibition shall be reinforced through a conditional fine, unless this is unnecessary for a special reason. (405/1986)

Section 7 (1532/2001)

The prohibition referred to in section 6 shall be imposed by the Market Court. The Market Court may also impose a temporary ban, which shall remain in force until the case is finally decided.

In addition to the above provisions, the Market Court Act (1527/2001) and the Act on Certain

Proceedings before the Market Court (1528/2001) shall apply to the Market Court and to proceedings in the Market Court.

Section 8 (1532/2001)

In imposing the prohibition referred to in section 6, the Market Court may order the entrepreneur to undertake appropriate remedial action within a specified period, if this is deemed necessary on the grounds of the evident harm caused by the act. The order may be reinforced through a conditional fine.

On the motion of the plaintiff, the Market Court may order that the decision in a case involving a prohibition shall be published in one or more newspapers or periodicals at the expense of the defendant. The publication of a decision on a temporary ban may not be ordered.

Section 9 (810/1990)

Whoever violates deliberately or out of gross negligence the provisions of sections 2 or 3 shall be sentenced to a fine for a violation of the competition rules relating to business practices, unless a more severe sentence is provided for elsewhere in law for the act or omission.

Whoever deliberately violates the provisions of section 2 (1) commits an offence referred to in section 2 of chapter 30 of the Penal Code and shall be sentenced for an infringement of the competition rules relating to business practices in accordance with the Penal Code.

Section 10 (810/1990)

Whoever in violation of the provisions of section 4 deliberately uses or reveals a technical model or technical directions shall be sentenced to a fine for abuse of a technical model or technical directions or to imprisonment for six months at most, unless a more severe sentence is provided for elsewhere in law for the act or omission.

Whoever otherwise in violation of the provisions of section 4 deliberately commits an offence referred to in sections 4 - 6 of chapter 30 of the Penal Code shall be sentenced for industrial espionage or for breach or disclosure of a business secret in accordance with the Penal Code.

Section 11

Charges for a violation referred to in this Act shall be brought before a general court of first instance. The public prosecutor may not bring charges unless the injured party has reported the matter for the bringing of charges. (810/1990)

When considering cases referred to in sections 2 and 3 of this Act, the court shall reserve the Consumer Ombudsman an opportunity to be heard.

Section 12

This Act enters into force on 1 January 1979. It repeals the Act on the Prevention of Unfair Competition of 31 January 1930 (34/1930).