À propos de la propriété intellectuelle Formation en propriété intellectuelle Respect de la propriété intellectuelle Sensibilisation à la propriété intellectuelle La propriété intellectuelle pour… Propriété intellectuelle et… Propriété intellectuelle et… Information relative aux brevets et à la technologie Information en matière de marques Information en matière de dessins et modèles industriels Information en matière d’indications géographiques Information en matière de protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Lois, traités et jugements dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Ressources relatives à la propriété intellectuelle Rapports sur la propriété intellectuelle Protection des brevets Protection des marques Protection des dessins et modèles industriels Protection des indications géographiques Protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Règlement extrajudiciaire des litiges Solutions opérationnelles à l’intention des offices de propriété intellectuelle Paiement de services de propriété intellectuelle Décisions et négociations Coopération en matière de développement Appui à l’innovation Partenariats public-privé Outils et services en matière d’intelligence artificielle L’Organisation Travailler avec nous Responsabilité Brevets Marques Dessins et modèles industriels Indications géographiques Droit d’auteur Secrets d’affaires Académie de l’OMPI Ateliers et séminaires Application des droits de propriété intellectuelle WIPO ALERT Sensibilisation Journée mondiale de la propriété intellectuelle Magazine de l’OMPI Études de cas et exemples de réussite Actualités dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Prix de l’OMPI Entreprises Universités Peuples autochtones Instances judiciaires Ressources génétiques, savoirs traditionnels et expressions culturelles traditionnelles Économie Égalité des genres Santé mondiale Changement climatique Politique en matière de concurrence Objectifs de développement durable Technologies de pointe Applications mobiles Sport Tourisme PATENTSCOPE Analyse de brevets Classification internationale des brevets Programme ARDI – Recherche pour l’innovation Programme ASPI – Information spécialisée en matière de brevets Base de données mondiale sur les marques Madrid Monitor Base de données Article 6ter Express Classification de Nice Classification de Vienne Base de données mondiale sur les dessins et modèles Bulletin des dessins et modèles internationaux Base de données Hague Express Classification de Locarno Base de données Lisbon Express Base de données mondiale sur les marques relative aux indications géographiques Base de données PLUTO sur les variétés végétales Base de données GENIE Traités administrés par l’OMPI WIPO Lex – lois, traités et jugements en matière de propriété intellectuelle Normes de l’OMPI Statistiques de propriété intellectuelle WIPO Pearl (Terminologie) Publications de l’OMPI Profils nationaux Centre de connaissances de l’OMPI Série de rapports de l’OMPI consacrés aux tendances technologiques Indice mondial de l’innovation Rapport sur la propriété intellectuelle dans le monde PCT – Le système international des brevets ePCT Budapest – Le système international de dépôt des micro-organismes Madrid – Le système international des marques eMadrid Article 6ter (armoiries, drapeaux, emblèmes nationaux) La Haye – Le système international des dessins et modèles industriels eHague Lisbonne – Le système d’enregistrement international des indications géographiques eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Médiation Arbitrage Procédure d’expertise Litiges relatifs aux noms de domaine Accès centralisé aux résultats de la recherche et de l’examen (WIPO CASE) Service d’accès numérique aux documents de priorité (DAS) WIPO Pay Compte courant auprès de l’OMPI Assemblées de l’OMPI Comités permanents Calendrier des réunions WIPO Webcast Documents officiels de l’OMPI Plan d’action de l’OMPI pour le développement Assistance technique Institutions de formation en matière de propriété intellectuelle Mesures d’appui concernant la COVID-19 Stratégies nationales de propriété intellectuelle Assistance en matière d’élaboration des politiques et de formulation de la législation Pôle de coopération Centres d’appui à la technologie et à l’innovation (CATI) Transfert de technologie Programme d’aide aux inventeurs WIPO GREEN Initiative PAT-INFORMED de l’OMPI Consortium pour des livres accessibles L’OMPI pour les créateurs WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Assistant de classification États membres Observateurs Directeur général Activités par unité administrative Bureaux extérieurs Avis de vacance d’emploi Achats Résultats et budget Rapports financiers Audit et supervision
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Lois Traités Jugements Parcourir par ressort juridique

Royaume-Uni

GB180

Retour

The Trade Marks (Proof of Use, etc.) Regulations 2004

 Microsoft Word - uksi_20040946_en.doc

S T A T U T O R Y I N S T R U M E N T S

2004 No. 946

TRADE MARKS

The Trade Marks (Proof of Use, etc.) Regulations 2004

Made - - - - 28th March 2004

Laid before Parliament 31st March 2004

Coming into force - - 5th May 2004

The Secretary of State, being a Minister designated(a) for the purposes of section 2(2) of the

European Communities Act 1972(b) in relation to measures relating to patents and to trade marks, in exercise of the powers conferred on her by that section, hereby makes the following

Regulations:

Citation, commencement and extent

1. These Regulations may be cited as the Trade Marks (Proof of Use, etc.) Regulations 2004 and

shall come into force on 5th May 2004.

2. These Regulations extend to England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.

Amendments to the Trade Marks Act 1994

3. The Trade Marks Act 1994(c) shall be amended as follows.

4. After section 6 there shall be inserted—

6A Raising of relative grounds in opposition proceedings in case of non-use

(1) This section applies where—

(a) an application for registration of a trade mark has been published,

(b) there is an earlier trade mark in relation to which the conditions set out in section

5(1), (2) or (3) obtain, and

(c) the registration procedure for the earlier trade mark was completed before the start

of the period of five years ending with the date of publication.

(2) In opposition proceedings, the registrar shall not refuse to register the trade mark by

reason of the earlier trade mark unless the use conditions are met.

(3) The use conditions are met if—

(a) within the period of five years ending with the date of publication of the

application the earlier trade mark has been put to genuine use in the United

(a) SI 1995/2983. (b) 1972 c. 68. (c) 1994 c. 26.

2

Kingdom by the proprietor or with his consent in relation to the goods or services

for which it is registered, or

(b) the earlier trade mark has not been so used, but there are proper reasons for non-

use.

(4) For these purposes—

(a) use of a trade mark includes use in a form differing in elements which do not alter

the distinctive character of the mark in the form in which it was registered, and

(b) use in the United Kingdom includes affixing the trade mark to goods or to the

packaging of goods in the United Kingdom solely for export purposes.

(5) In relation to a Community trade mark, any reference in subsection (3) or (4) to the

United Kingdom shall be construed as a reference to the European Community.

(6) Where an earlier trade mark satisfies the use conditions in respect of some only of the

goods or services for which it is registered, it shall be treated for the purposes of this section

as if it were registered only in respect of those goods or services.

(7) Nothing in this section affects—

(a) the refusal of registration on the grounds mentioned in section 3 (absolute grounds

for refusal) or section 5(4)(relative grounds of refusal on the basis of an earlier

right), or

(b) the making of an application for a declaration of invalidity under section 47(2)

(application on relative grounds where no consent to registration).”.

5. In section 40 (registration), in subsection (1), for the words after “his notice” there shall be substituted “since the application was accepted that the registration requirements (other than those

mentioned in section 5(1), (2) or (3)) were not met at that time.”.

6. In section 47 (grounds for invalidity of registration), after subsection (2) there shall be

inserted—

“(2A) But the registration of a trade mark may not be declared invalid on the ground that

there is an earlier trade mark unless—

(a) the registration procedure for the earlier trade mark was completed within the

period of five years ending with the date of the application for the declaration,

(b) the registration procedure for the earlier trade mark was not completed before that

date, or

(c) the use conditions are met.

(2B) The use conditions are met if—

(a) within the period of five years ending with the date of the application for the

declaration the earlier trade mark has been put to genuine use in the United

Kingdom by the proprietor or with his consent in relation to the goods or

services for which it is registered, or

(b) it has not been so used, but there are proper reasons for non-use.

(2C) For these purposes—

(a) use of a trade mark includes use in a form differing in elements which do not alter

the distinctive character of the mark in the form in which it was registered, and

(b) use in the United Kingdom includes affixing the trade mark to goods or to the

packaging of goods in the United Kingdom solely for export purposes.

(2D) In relation to a Community trade mark, any reference in subsection (2B) or (2C) to

the United Kingdom shall be construed as a reference to the European Community.

(2E) Where an earlier trade mark satisfies the use conditions in respect of some only of

the goods or services for which it is registered, it shall be treated for the purposes of this section as if it were registered only in respect of those goods or services.”.

3

7.—(1) In section 5, subsection (3)(b) and the word “and” immediately preceding it shall be

omitted.

(2) In section 10(3)—

(a) after the words “course of trade” there shall be inserted “, in relation to goods or

services,”;

(b) paragraph (b) and the word “and” immediately preceding it shall be omitted.

Transitional provisions

8. Regulations 4 and 5 shall not apply in respect of any application for the registration of a trade mark which has been published before they came into force.

9. Any application under section 47(3) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 (application for a declaration of invalidity) which was made before the coming into force of these Regulations shall be dealt with under section 47 as it had effect before regulation 6 came into force.

Sainsbury of Turville, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Science and Innovation,

28th March 2004 Department of Trade and Industry

EXPLANATORY NOTE

(This note is not part of the Regulations)

Regulations 4 to 6 implement Article 11(1) and (2) of Directive 89/104/EEC, the First Council

Directive to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (O.J. L40, 11.2.89, p.1) (“the Directive”).

Regulation 4, which implements Article 11(2) of the Directive in part, inserts a new section 6A into the Trade Marks Act 1994 (“the Act”). This section will require an opponent who bases his

opposition to the registration of a trade mark on certain earlier trade marks to show use of those marks.

Regulation 5 makes a consequential amendment to section 40 (registration) of the Act.

Regulation 6, which implements Article 11(1) of the Directive, inserts five new subsections into section 47 of the Act (invalidity). These subsections require an applicant who bases his application

for a declaration of invalidity on certain earlier trade marks to show use of those marks.

Regulation 7 repeals section 5(3)(b) and amends section 10(3) of the Act. These amendments implement the decision of the European Court of Justice in Davidoff & Cie SA and Zino Davidoff SA v Gofkid Ltd of 9th January 2003 (C-292/00) which was confirmed by its decision in Adidas- Salomon AG and Adidas Benelux BV v Fitnessworld Trading Ltd of 23rd October 2003 (C- 408/01). Those decisions determined that Article 5(2) of the Directive, which on the face of it, grants a right to the proprietor of a trade mark to prevent third parties from using an identical or

similar trade mark in relation to goods or services which are not similar where the earlier trade mark has a reputation and the use of that sign takes unfair advantage or is detrimental to the distinctive character of that earlier trade mark, also applies to goods or services which are similar

or identical to those for which the earlier trade mark is registered.

Regulations 8 and 9 are transitional provisions relating to opposition proceedings and applications for a declaration of invalidity.

A Regulatory Impact Assessment is available, copies of which have been placed in the libraries of

both Houses of Parliament. Copies of the assessment are also available from the Trade Marks Directorate, The Patent Office, Concept Office, Cardiff Road, Newport, NP10 8QQ.

£3.00

Crown copyright 2004

Printed and published in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited

under the authority and superintendence of Carol Tullo, Controller of Her Majesty’s

Stationery Office and Queen’s Printer of Acts of Parliament.

E0520 4/2004 140520T 19585

ISBN 0-11-049027-4

9 780110 490274