Propiedad intelectual Formación en PI Respeto por la PI Divulgación de la PI La PI para... La PI y… La PI en… Información sobre patentes y tecnología Información sobre marcas Información sobre diseños industriales Información sobre las indicaciones geográficas Información sobre las variedades vegetales (UPOV) Leyes, tratados y sentencias de PI Recursos de PI Informes sobre PI Protección por patente Protección de las marcas Protección de diseños industriales Protección de las indicaciones geográficas Protección de las variedades vegetales (UPOV) Solución de controversias en materia de PI Soluciones operativas para las oficinas de PI Pagar por servicios de PI Negociación y toma de decisiones Cooperación para el desarrollo Apoyo a la innovación Colaboraciones público-privadas Herramientas y servicios de IA La Organización Trabajar con la OMPI Rendición de cuentas Patentes Marcas Diseños industriales Indicaciones geográficas Derecho de autor Secretos comerciales Academia de la OMPI Talleres y seminarios Observancia de la PI WIPO ALERT Sensibilizar Día Mundial de la PI Revista de la OMPI Casos prácticos y casos de éxito Novedades sobre la PI Premios de la OMPI Empresas Universidades Pueblos indígenas Judicatura Recursos genéticos, conocimientos tradicionales y expresiones culturales tradicionales Economía Igualdad de género Salud mundial Cambio climático Política de competencia Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible Tecnologías de vanguardia Aplicaciones móviles Deportes Turismo PATENTSCOPE Análisis de patentes Clasificación Internacional de Patentes ARDI - Investigación para la innovación ASPI - Información especializada sobre patentes Base Mundial de Datos sobre Marcas Madrid Monitor Base de datos Artículo 6ter Express Clasificación de Niza Clasificación de Viena Base Mundial de Datos sobre Dibujos y Modelos Boletín de Dibujos y Modelos Internacionales Base de datos Hague Express Clasificación de Locarno Base de datos Lisbon Express Base Mundial de Datos sobre Marcas para indicaciones geográficas Base de datos de variedades vegetales PLUTO Base de datos GENIE Tratados administrados por la OMPI WIPO Lex: leyes, tratados y sentencias de PI Normas técnicas de la OMPI Estadísticas de PI WIPO Pearl (terminología) Publicaciones de la OMPI Perfiles nacionales sobre PI Centro de Conocimiento de la OMPI Informes de la OMPI sobre tendencias tecnológicas Índice Mundial de Innovación Informe mundial sobre la propiedad intelectual PCT - El sistema internacional de patentes ePCT Budapest - El Sistema internacional de depósito de microorganismos Madrid - El sistema internacional de marcas eMadrid Artículo 6ter (escudos de armas, banderas, emblemas de Estado) La Haya - Sistema internacional de diseños eHague Lisboa - Sistema internacional de indicaciones geográficas eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Mediación Arbitraje Determinación de expertos Disputas sobre nombres de dominio Acceso centralizado a la búsqueda y el examen (CASE) Servicio de acceso digital (DAS) WIPO Pay Cuenta corriente en la OMPI Asambleas de la OMPI Comités permanentes Calendario de reuniones WIPO Webcast Documentos oficiales de la OMPI Agenda para el Desarrollo Asistencia técnica Instituciones de formación en PI Apoyo para COVID-19 Estrategias nacionales de PI Asesoramiento sobre políticas y legislación Centro de cooperación Centros de apoyo a la tecnología y la innovación (CATI) Transferencia de tecnología Programa de Asistencia a los Inventores (PAI) WIPO GREEN PAT-INFORMED de la OMPI Consorcio de Libros Accesibles Consorcio de la OMPI para los Creadores WIPO Translate Conversión de voz a texto Asistente de clasificación Estados miembros Observadores Director general Actividades por unidad Oficinas en el exterior Ofertas de empleo Adquisiciones Resultados y presupuesto Información financiera Supervisión
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Leyes Tratados Sentencias Consultar por jurisdicción

WIPO Lex

WIPOLEX014-j

Atrás

Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa [2022]: Advertising Regulatory Board NPC and Others v Bliss Brands (Pty) Ltd (786/21) [2022] ZASCA 51

This is an informal case summary prepared for the purposes of facilitating exchange during the 2023 WIPO IP Judges Forum.

 

Session 7: Simplified or Fast Track Procedures for Certain Intellectual Property Claims

 

Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa [2022]: Advertising Regulatory Board NPC and Others v Bliss Brands (Pty) Ltd (786/21) [2022] ZASCA 51

 

Date of judgment: April 12, 2022

Issuing authority: Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa

Level of the issuing authority: Appellate instance

Type of procedure: Judicial (Administrative)

Subject matter: IP Regulatory Body; Enforcement of IP and Related Laws; Copyright and Related Rights (Neighboring Rights); Trademarks

Plaintiff: First Appellant: ADVERTISING REGULATORY BOARD NPC; Second Appellant: COLGATE-PALMOLIVE (PTY) LTD; Third Appellant: COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY

Defendant: Respondent: BLISS BRANDS (PTY) LTD

Keywords: Adjudicative administrative tribunal, Ousting the jurisdiction of the ordinary courts, Establishing a parallel dispute resolution process, Rules of evidence, Overlap with elements of a cause of action that could be pursued in a court, Public powers sourced by an agreement, Private body exercising a public function, Self-regulatory body, Right to self-regulation

 

Basic facts: The Final Appeal Committee (FAC) of the Advertising Regulatory Board (ARB) held against Bliss Brands, which was not one of the ARB’s members, in terms of clauses 8 and 9 of its consensual Code of Advertising Practice.  The FAC held that Bliss Brands had breached the Code by exploiting the advertising goodwill and imitating the packaging architecture of Colgate’s Protex soap.  It ordered Bliss Brands to cease the distribution of its Securex soap packaging.  

 

The FAC judgment was taken on review to the High Court (a court of first instance).  The High Court mero motu questioned the constitutionality of the ARB’s powers.  The High Court held, inter alia, that the ARB had no jurisdiction over non-members, that it could not oust the court’s powers and that it could not hear legal issues that entail the same enquiries as those which courts are called upon to consider in cases dealing with passing off and contraventions of copyright and trademarks.

 

Held: The Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa held that the ARB is a legitimate parallel adjudicative administrative tribunal, established by agreement/self-regulation.  The fact that elements of a complaint before the ARB might overlap with elements of IP causes of action that could be pursued in a court of law, does not mean that the ARB ousts the court’s jurisdiction.  The ARB may consider and issue a ruling to its members (which is not binding on non-members) on any advertisement, regardless of by whom it is published, to determine, on behalf of its members, whether its members should accept any advertisement before it is published or should withdraw any advertisement if it has been published.  Bliss Brands was held to be bound by the ARB’s FAC judgment, due to the aforesaid principle and the fact that it had subjected itself to the ARB’s jurisdiction.

 

A narrow application for leave to appeal, on the Advertising Regulatory Board’s jurisdiction only, was dismissed (see Bliss Brands (Pty) Ltd v Advertising Regulatory Board NPC and Others (CCT 132/22) [2023] ZACC 19).

 

Relevant holdings in relation to simplified or fast track procedures for certain intellectual property claims: The Advertising Regulatory Board is a constitutionally unassailable parallel adjudicative tribunal which may deal with complaints based on elements which overlap with the elements of traditional causes of action pertaining to copyright, trademarks and passing off, heard by courts (it bears mention that advertisements axiomatically include packaging and the use of trademarks and copyright).  It follows that the ARB’s simplified and accelerated procedure may be followed by parties who wish to resolve IP disputes (excluding most aspects of patent law) and make use of the remedies/sanctions imposed by the ARB.

 

                                                                                      

Relevant legislation:

Independent Communications Authority of South Africa Act 2000 (Act No. 13 of 2000)

 

Electronic Communications and Transactions Act (No. 25 of 2002)

 

Not legislation but consensual codes:

The ARB’s CODE OF ADVERTISING PRACTICE, which is based upon the International Code of Advertising Practice, prepared by the International Chamber of Commerce. Available at: https://www.arb.org.za/phone/codes.html

 

The ARB’s Procedural Guide, with emphasis on section 14 (the sanctions which may be imposed). Available at: https://www.arb.org.za/assets/procedural-guide-v2021.1rev.pdf