关于知识产权 知识产权培训 树立尊重知识产权的风尚 知识产权外联 部门知识产权 知识产权和热点议题 特定领域知识产权 专利和技术信息 商标信息 工业品外观设计信息 地理标志信息 植物品种信息(UPOV) 知识产权法律、条约和判决 知识产权资源 知识产权报告 专利保护 商标保护 工业品外观设计保护 地理标志保护 植物品种保护(UPOV) 知识产权争议解决 知识产权局业务解决方案 知识产权服务缴费 谈判与决策 发展合作 创新支持 公私伙伴关系 人工智能工具和服务 组织简介 与产权组织合作 问责制 专利 商标 工业品外观设计 地理标志 版权 商业秘密 WIPO学院 讲习班和研讨会 知识产权执法 WIPO ALERT 宣传 世界知识产权日 WIPO杂志 案例研究和成功故事 知识产权新闻 产权组织奖 企业 高校 土著人民 司法机构 遗传资源、传统知识和传统文化表现形式 经济学 金融 无形资产 性别平等 全球卫生 气候变化 竞争政策 可持续发展目标 前沿技术 移动应用 体育 旅游 PATENTSCOPE 专利分析 国际专利分类 ARDI - 研究促进创新 ASPI - 专业化专利信息 全球品牌数据库 马德里监视器 Article 6ter Express数据库 尼斯分类 维也纳分类 全球外观设计数据库 国际外观设计公报 Hague Express数据库 洛迦诺分类 Lisbon Express数据库 全球品牌数据库地理标志信息 PLUTO植物品种数据库 GENIE数据库 产权组织管理的条约 WIPO Lex - 知识产权法律、条约和判决 产权组织标准 知识产权统计 WIPO Pearl(术语) 产权组织出版物 国家知识产权概况 产权组织知识中心 产权组织技术趋势 全球创新指数 世界知识产权报告 PCT - 国际专利体系 ePCT 布达佩斯 - 国际微生物保藏体系 马德里 - 国际商标体系 eMadrid 第六条之三(徽章、旗帜、国徽) 海牙 - 国际外观设计体系 eHague 里斯本 - 国际地理标志体系 eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange 调解 仲裁 专家裁决 域名争议 检索和审查集中式接入(CASE) 数字查询服务(DAS) WIPO Pay 产权组织往来账户 产权组织各大会 常设委员会 会议日历 WIPO Webcast 产权组织正式文件 发展议程 技术援助 知识产权培训机构 COVID-19支持 国家知识产权战略 政策和立法咨询 合作枢纽 技术与创新支持中心(TISC) 技术转移 发明人援助计划(IAP) WIPO GREEN 产权组织的PAT-INFORMED 无障碍图书联合会 产权组织服务创作者 WIPO Translate 语音转文字 分类助手 成员国 观察员 总干事 部门活动 驻外办事处 职位空缺 采购 成果和预算 财务报告 监督
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
法律 条约 判决 按管辖区浏览

部长法令,B.E. 1999(2542)(第22号), 泰国

返回
WIPO Lex中的最新版本
详情 详情 版本年份 1999 日期 生效: 1999年9月24日 发布: 1999年9月24日 文本类型 实施规则/实施细则 主题 专利(发明), 实用新型., 工业品外观设计 部长法令,B.E. 1999(2542)(第22号),系根据专利法1979制定。

可用资料

主要文本 相关文本
主要文本 主要文本 英语 Ministerial Regulations No. 22 of 1999 (B.E. 2542)        
Ministerial Regulations No. 22 (B.E. 2542), issued under the Patent Act of 1979

Contents:

Clause 1

Clause 2

Clause 3

Clause 4

Clause 5

Clause 6

Clause 7

Clause 8

Clause 9

Clause 10

Clause 11

Clause 12

Clause 13

Clause 14

Clause 15

Clause 16

 

 

Ministerial Regulations No. 22 (B.E. 2542)

Issued under the Patent Act B.E. 2522

 

By virtue of the power granted under Sections 4, 24, 26, 27, 30 and 65 of the Patent Act B.E. 2522 and Sections 28, 65quarter, 65quinquies and 65decies of the Patent Act B.E. 2522 as amended by the Patent act (No. 3) B.E. 2542 and Section 44 of the Patent Act (No. 3) B.E. 2542, the Minister of Commerce hereby issues the Ministerial Regulations as follows:

 

Clause 1

The following shall be repealed: (1) Ministerial Regulations No. 3 (B.E. 2523) issued under the Patent Act B.E. 2522;

(2) Ministerial Regulations No. 16 (B.E. 2535) issued under the Patent Act B.E. 2522.

 

Clause 2

In processing an application for a patent for an invention or a petty patent to submit an examination report to the Director-General under Section 28 or 65quinquies, as the case may be, the competent officer shall examine the application for a patent or petty patent as follows: (1) the request form, the description, the claims, the drawings (if any) and the abstract comply with the Ministerial Regulations issued under Section 17 or 65decies and 17, as the case may be; (2) the invention is not unpatentable under Section 9 or 65decies and 9, as the case may be; (3) the applicant has the right to apply for a patent under Sections 10, 11, 14 or Section 15 paragraph 1 or 2 or the right to apply for a petty patent under Sections 65decies and 10, 11, 14 or Section 15 paragraph one or two, as the case may be; (4) the applicant has the right to be granted a patent or petty patent under Section 16 or 65decies and 16, as the case may be; (5) the invention for which a patent or petty patent is applied is not the same invention which a patent or petty patent was applied in the country under Section 65ter before the filing date, as the case may be; (6) the invention for which a petty patent is applied is so linked as to form a single inventive concept.

 

Clause 3

In processing an application for a design patent to submit an examination report to the Director-General under Sections 65 and 28, the competent 17 officer shall examine the application as follows: (1) the request form, the claim, the design representations, the description and other items (if any) comply with the Ministerial Regulations issued under Section 59; (2) the design is not unpatentable under Section 58; (3) the applicant has the right to apply for a patent under Sections 65 and 10, 11, 14 or Section 15 paragraph one or two, as the case may be; (4) the applicant has the right to be granted a patent under Sections 65 and 16.

 

Clause 4

If it is found from the examination of the application for a patent or petty patent, as the case may be, under Clause 2 that the applications are not in compliance with the law or filed by more than one applicant, the competent officer shall proceed as follows: (1) if the same invention has been applied or jointly applied for both a patent and a petty patent, the applicant shall be notified that he is deemed to have applied for a petty patent in accordance with Section 77quinquies; (2) if the same invention was made by two or more persons separately and independently and it has been applied for a patent by one applicant and applied for a petty patent by another, all applicants shall be notified that the applicant who is the first to file is to be entitled to a patent or petty patent, as the case may be; (3) if the same invention was made by two or more persons separately and independently and it has been applied for a patent by one applicant and applied for a petty patent by another on the same date, all applicants shall be notified to reach an agreement within ninety days following the receipt of the notification. The notification under the first paragraph shall be in writing and sent by acknowledgement mail or any other procedure prescribed by the Director- General.

 

Clause 5

Where it appears that the application for a patent or petty patent does not comply with Clause 2(1) or 3(1) or the invention is partly unpatentable under Section 9 or Sections 65decies and 9, the competent officer shall submit an examination report to the Director-General for requiring the applicant to amend the application within the prescribed period.

 

Clause 6

Where it appears that the invention for which a patent or a petty patent is applied as the case may be, is unpatentable under Section 9 or Section 65decies and 9, or the design for which a patent is applied is unpatentable under Section 58, or the application for a patent or petty patent does not comply with Clause 2(3) or 3(3), the competent officer shall submit an examination report to the Director-General for rejecting the application for a patent or petty patent. Before rejecting the application under the first paragraph, the Director-General may instruct the applicant to answer any question or to amend the application for a patent or petty patent.

 

Clause 7

Where a request for amendment is made by the applicant pursuant to Clause 5 or 6 paragraph two or under the Ministerial Regulations issued under Section 20 or Sections 65 and 20 or Section 65decies and 20, as the case may be, the competent officer shall examine such amendment whether it complies with the requirement or the Ministerial Regulations.

 

Clause 8

Where it appears that the application for a petty patent does not comply with Sections 65 decies and 18, the competent officer shall instruct the applicant to separate the application into a number of applications by amending the original application to relate to a single invention and filing separate applications for the other inventions. The applications separated under the first paragraph shall comply with the requirements for a normal application for a petty patent and shall not enlarge the scope of the invention disclosed in the original application. In such a case, the applicant shall not be required to submit additional written evidence showing that he is entitled to apply for a petty patent.

 

Clause 9

Where the Director-General finds, on the basis of the examination report submitted by the competent officer, the application for a patent or petty patent does not comply with the provisions of the law and rejects the application under Section 28(1), Sections 65 and 28(1), or Section 65quinquies(1), as the case may be, the competent officer shall notify the applicant of such decision and publish it by placing the decision in an open area within the Department Intellectual Property, Ministry of Commerce for at least thirty days. The publication of the decision referred to in the first paragraph shall 19 indicate at least the following particulars: (1) the number of the application and date of application; (2) the name of the applicant and the agent (if any); (3) the name of the inventor or creator, and the title of the invention or design; (4) the reasons of the rejection. The notification under the first paragraph shall be in writing and sent by acknowledgement mail or any other method prescribed by the Director- General.

 

Clause 10

In the case where the Director-General has, on the basis of the examination report submitted by the competent officer, ordered the publication of the application for a patent or the registration of an invention and the grant of a petty patent under Section 28(2), Sections 65 and 28(2) or Section 65 quinquies (2), as the case may be, when the applicant has paid the fees within the prescribed period, the competent officer shall publish the application or the registration of the invention and the grant of the petty patent in the Patent Applications Publication Gazette or the Registration of Inventions and Grants of Petty Patents Publication Gazette, as the case may be. The publication under the first paragraph shall indicate at least the following particulars: (1) the number of the application and date of application; (2) the name of the applicant and the agent (if any); (3) the name of the inventor or creator, and the title of the invention or design; (4) the date of publication; (5) other particulars as the Director-General deems appropriate.

 

Clause 11

Where an application has been published in accordance with Section 28(2) or Sections 65 and 28(2) and the applicant has filed a request for examination pursuant to Section 29 or there is an opposition that the invention or design claimed in the application does not comply with the provisions of Section 5 or 56, or where a request for examination of the invention for which a petty patent is applied under Section 65sexies has been filed, the competent officer shall examine the application as to substance as follows: (1) whether the subject matter of the invention or design claimed in the application was disclosed or described in any document or printed matter 20 forming part of the documentation collected for the purpose of examining patent applications; (2) whether the subject matter of the invention claimed in the application was that was applied for a patent or petty patent in the country and in a foreign country and was published before the application was filed in the country. The Director-General may, where he deems appropriate, require the competent officer to examine whether the claimed invention satisfies the conditions set forth in Section 5, 56 or 65bis other than those specified in (1) and (2).

Clause 12

After the publication of the application under Clause 10, the competent officer shall examine whether or not the application is seeking protection for several inventions or designs, which does not comply with the provisions of Section 18 or 60. In this case, the provisions of Clause 8 shall apply mutatis mutandis.

 

Clause 13

In the case where the applicant has applied for a patent for the claimed invention in a foreign country, the applicant, when he has received the examination report or any document showing the result of the examination, shall submit such report or document together with its translation in Thai within ninety days from the date of receipt of such report or document. If the applicant has applied for patent in two foreign countries or more, he shall submit the examination report or document issued by the first country he filed his application or the country prescribed by the Director-General. The examination report or document showing the result of the examination shall indicate the office or organization issuing such report or document, the name of the applicant, the filing date of the application, the symbol of the International Patent Classification which has been allocated to the application, the field of art in which the application has been examined and relevant documents showing the prior art and which should be considered, and shall also specify whether the claimed invention satisfies the requirements prescribed by the law of that country or not, whether the description complies with the law of that country or not, whether protection under the law of that country should be granted to the claims or not, and state the reasons of the decision. The documents under the first and second paragraphs shall be filed with 21 or sent by registered mail to the competent officer at any of the following places: (1) the Department of Intellectual Property, Ministry of Commerce; (2) any provincial commercial office or governmental office prescribed by the Director-General. Where the examination report or document showing the result of the examination does not comply with paragraph 3 of this Clause, the Director-General may, if requested by the applicant, allow the applicant to submit such a report or document.

 

Clause 14

Where the applicant wants to convert his application from an application for a patent to an application for a petty patent or from an application for a petty patent to an application for a patent, as the case may be, the applicant shall submit an application for such conversion in the form as prescribed by the Director-General to the competent officer or send the application by registered mail to the competent officer at any of the following places: (1) the Department of Intellectual Property, Ministry of Commerce; (2) any provincial commercial office or governmental office prescribed by the Director-General. The application for conversion under the first paragraph shall consist of the documents forming the application for a patent or petty patent prescribed by the Ministerial Regulations issued under Section 17 or Sections 65decies and 17, as the case may be. The applicant for conversion under the first paragraph shall not be entitled to refund an excess amount of the fees already paid.

 

Clause 15

The application for invention patents filed before the entry into force of these Ministerial Regulations upon which the Director-General has not made his order under Section 33 or 34 shall be processed in accordance with these Ministerial Regulations.

 

Clause 16

The applications for invention patents filed before the entry into force of the Patent Act (No. 3) B.E. 2542 proposed to be converted to the other type of application shall comply with Clause 10 of these Ministerial Regulations.

 

Given on September 24, 1999


立法 实施 (1 文本) 实施 (1 文本) 世贸组织文件号
IP/N/1/THA/I/4
无可用数据。

WIPO Lex编号 TH010