À propos de la propriété intellectuelle Formation en propriété intellectuelle Respect de la propriété intellectuelle Sensibilisation à la propriété intellectuelle La propriété intellectuelle pour… Propriété intellectuelle et… Propriété intellectuelle et… Information relative aux brevets et à la technologie Information en matière de marques Information en matière de dessins et modèles industriels Information en matière d’indications géographiques Information en matière de protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Lois, traités et jugements dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Ressources relatives à la propriété intellectuelle Rapports sur la propriété intellectuelle Protection des brevets Protection des marques Protection des dessins et modèles industriels Protection des indications géographiques Protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Règlement extrajudiciaire des litiges Solutions opérationnelles à l’intention des offices de propriété intellectuelle Paiement de services de propriété intellectuelle Décisions et négociations Coopération en matière de développement Appui à l’innovation Partenariats public-privé Outils et services en matière d’intelligence artificielle L’Organisation Travailler avec nous Responsabilité Brevets Marques Dessins et modèles industriels Indications géographiques Droit d’auteur Secrets d’affaires Académie de l’OMPI Ateliers et séminaires Application des droits de propriété intellectuelle WIPO ALERT Sensibilisation Journée mondiale de la propriété intellectuelle Magazine de l’OMPI Études de cas et exemples de réussite Actualités dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Prix de l’OMPI Entreprises Universités Peuples autochtones Instances judiciaires Ressources génétiques, savoirs traditionnels et expressions culturelles traditionnelles Économie Égalité des genres Santé mondiale Changement climatique Politique en matière de concurrence Objectifs de développement durable Technologies de pointe Applications mobiles Sport Tourisme PATENTSCOPE Analyse de brevets Classification internationale des brevets Programme ARDI – Recherche pour l’innovation Programme ASPI – Information spécialisée en matière de brevets Base de données mondiale sur les marques Madrid Monitor Base de données Article 6ter Express Classification de Nice Classification de Vienne Base de données mondiale sur les dessins et modèles Bulletin des dessins et modèles internationaux Base de données Hague Express Classification de Locarno Base de données Lisbon Express Base de données mondiale sur les marques relative aux indications géographiques Base de données PLUTO sur les variétés végétales Base de données GENIE Traités administrés par l’OMPI WIPO Lex – lois, traités et jugements en matière de propriété intellectuelle Normes de l’OMPI Statistiques de propriété intellectuelle WIPO Pearl (Terminologie) Publications de l’OMPI Profils nationaux Centre de connaissances de l’OMPI Série de rapports de l’OMPI consacrés aux tendances technologiques Indice mondial de l’innovation Rapport sur la propriété intellectuelle dans le monde PCT – Le système international des brevets ePCT Budapest – Le système international de dépôt des micro-organismes Madrid – Le système international des marques eMadrid Article 6ter (armoiries, drapeaux, emblèmes nationaux) La Haye – Le système international des dessins et modèles industriels eHague Lisbonne – Le système d’enregistrement international des indications géographiques eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Médiation Arbitrage Procédure d’expertise Litiges relatifs aux noms de domaine Accès centralisé aux résultats de la recherche et de l’examen (WIPO CASE) Service d’accès numérique aux documents de priorité (DAS) WIPO Pay Compte courant auprès de l’OMPI Assemblées de l’OMPI Comités permanents Calendrier des réunions WIPO Webcast Documents officiels de l’OMPI Plan d’action de l’OMPI pour le développement Assistance technique Institutions de formation en matière de propriété intellectuelle Mesures d’appui concernant la COVID-19 Stratégies nationales de propriété intellectuelle Assistance en matière d’élaboration des politiques et de formulation de la législation Pôle de coopération Centres d’appui à la technologie et à l’innovation (CATI) Transfert de technologie Programme d’aide aux inventeurs WIPO GREEN Initiative PAT-INFORMED de l’OMPI Consortium pour des livres accessibles L’OMPI pour les créateurs WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Assistant de classification États membres Observateurs Directeur général Activités par unité administrative Bureaux extérieurs Avis de vacance d’emploi Achats Résultats et budget Rapports financiers Audit et supervision
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Lois Traités Jugements Parcourir par ressort juridique

Chine

CN042-j

Retour

The public prosecutor V. Guo Mingsheng, Guo Mingfeng and Sun Shubiao (2015) SZZXCZ No. 0004, Suqian Intermediate People’s Court of Jiangsu

The public prosecutor V. Guo Mingsheng, Guo Mingfeng and Sun Shubiao (2015) SZZXCZ No. 0004, Suqian Intermediate People’s Court of Jiangsu

 

Cause of action: Criminal case alleged counterfeiting

 

Collegial panel members: Cheng Liming | Zhu Geng | Bai Jin

 

Keywords: amount of illegal business revenue, crime of counterfeiting, criminal, online sales

 

Relevant legal provisions: Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China, article 213

 

Basic facts: The public prosecutor charged the defendants with the following.

From the end of November 2013 to June 2014, without the authorization of Samsung (China) Investment Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Samsung Investment”), and for the purpose of seeking illegal profits and in collusion with Sun Shubiao and Guo Mingfeng, Guo Mingsheng made wholesale purchases from other persons of counterfeit bare SΛMSUNG mobile phones and accessories, assembled them, promoted them as “genuine and authentic” in his online store “SΛMSUNG Digital Shoppe” on Taobao, and sold them at a price significantly lower than the market price. The three sold a total of more than 20,000 counterfeit SΛMSUNG mobile phones, achieving sales revenue of over RMB20 million and illegal profits of over RMB2 million. This formed the basis of their criminal liabilities for the crime of counterfeiting. In the joint criminal proceedings, Guo Mingsheng was found to have played a leading role and was the principal offender; Guo Mingfeng and Sun Shubiao were found to have played an assisting role and were accessories, entailing lighter punishments.

 

Guo Mingsheng, Sun Shubiao, Guo Mingfeng and their counsel confirmed, without dissent, the criminal facts that they, without authorization from the holder of SΛMSUNG trademark, had assembled counterfeit SΛMSUNG mobile phones, and had promoted and sold them through their online store on Taobao, but they filed an objection to the amount of illegal business revenue and illegal profits achieved. They contended that the real volume of business was no more than 10,000 sets, because they had hired some “click farmers” to boost the feigned credibility of their online store. Upon investigation, the court found that “SΛMSUNG” is a trademark that has been registered in China by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. (hereinafter “Samsung Electronics”) with validity until July 27, 2021; Samsung Investment is a company established by Samsung Electronics in China, and is specially authorized by Samsung Electronics to deal with the management and legal affairs concerning trademarks, patents, copyrights and other intellectual property rights owned by Samsung Electronics. In November 2013, Guo Mingsheng had purchased a Taobao online store (account no. play2011-1985), the storekeeper of which was “Wang Liang”, and then changed its name to “SΛMSUNG Digital Counter”. Without authorization from Samsung Investment, he made wholesale purchases of counterfeit bare SΛMSUNG I8552 mobile phones and accessories from Yuanwang Digital Mall at Huaqiangbei, Shenzhen, and from Tongtiandi Telecommunication Market in Futian District, Shenzhen, assembled them, and then promoted and sold them as “genuine and authentic” through his online store “SΛMSUNG Digital Counter” on Taobao. Guo Mingfeng was responsible for customer service and managing customer service staff at the online store, and Sun Shubiao was responsible for sourcing, packaging and contracting with delivery companies for shipment of the counterfeit SΛMSUNG I8552 mobile phones. Up until June 2014, the online store assembled and sold a total of more than 20,000 counterfeit SΛMSUNG I8552 mobile phones, on an aggregated basis, achieving total sales revenue of over RMB20 million and illegal profit of over RMB2 million.

 

Held: Suqian Intermediate People’s Court of Jiangsu issued its judgment on September 8, 2015, finding that:

 

(a) Guo Mingsheng had committed the crime of counterfeiting and issuing a sentence of five years’ imprisonment, plus a fine of RMB1.6 million;

 

(b) Sun Shubiao had committed the crime of counterfeiting and issuing a sentence of three years’ imprisonment, with a five-year probation, plus a fine of RMB200,000; and

 

(c) Guo Mingfeng had committed the crime of counterfeiting and issuing a sentence of three years’ imprisonment, with a four-year probation, plus a fine of RMB200,000.

 

None of the three defendants appealed the decision and the judgment took effect.

 

Reasoning: The court held, in its effective judgment, that Guo Mingsheng, Guo Mingfeng and Sun Shubiao, without Samsung Investment’s authorization or licensing, purchased counterfeit bare SΛMSUNG mobile phones and accessories, assembled into mobile phones under the registered trademark “SΛMSUNG”, and promoted and sold them as “genuine and authentic” through their online store. Their activities constituted illegal behavior in using the same trademark on the same product without the authorization of the holder of the registered trademark. With sales revenue of over RMB20 million and illegal profits of over RMB2 million, it constituted the very severe crime of counterfeiting. Guo Mingsheng, Guo Mingfeng and Sun Shubiao filed an objection to the amount of illegal business revenue and illegal profit assessed by contending that they had hired “click farmers” to boost the feigned credibility of the online store. However, the three defendants’ confessions, as well as delivery bills, records of payment transfers from Alipay to Guo Mingfeng’s bank account, records of payments from Guo Mingfeng’s bank account, records of the Taobao online store “SΛMSUNG Digital Counter”, data records of delivery companies, records seized on site by the Public Security Department and other evidences collected by the Public Prosecution Department, corroborated each other to establish the prosecution’s charge that the defendants had in fact sold a total of more than 20,000 counterfeit SΛMSUNG I8552 mobile phones, achieving sales revenue of over RMB20 million and illegal profit of over RMB2 million. The defense put forward of “click farming” to feign sales and boost credibility was not supported by the evidence, and hence was found to be inadmissible. Guo Mingsheng, Guo Mingfeng and Sun Shubiao were jointly liable for the offence, in which Guo Mingsheng played a leading role and was the principal offender, and Guo Mingfeng and Sun Shubiao played an assisting role and were accessories, and therefore should be given lighter punishments.