About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

IP Treaties Collection

Contracting Parties Chile

Dates Accession: April 20, 2017 Entry into force: August 1, 2017

Declarations, Reservations

Reservation made upon accession and corrected July 3, 2017:
"The Republic of Chile declares that, in accordance with Article 6, paragraph 3, of the Convention on Cybercrime, it will not apply paragraph 1 of the same Article inasmuch as it does not affect the sale, distribution or otherwise making available of the items referred to in paragraph 1 a) ii) of said Article 6."

Declarations made upon accession:
1. "The Republic of Chile declares that it will require that the offense be committed with a specified criminal intent, to punish the actions described in Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention on Cybercrime, in accordance with the provisions of Article 2 of Law No. 19.223 on computer-related offenses."
2. "The Republic of Chile declares that it will require that the offense be committed with fraudulent intent and that it causes harm to third parties, to punish the actions described in Article 7 of the Convention on Cybercrime in accordance with the provisions of Article 197 of the Criminal Code."
3. "The Republic of Chile declares that, under Article 24 "Extradition", paragraph 7, of the Convention, the authority responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition or provisional arrest is:
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Chile, Teatinos 180, Santiago Chili."
4. "The Republic of Chile declares that, as regards to Article 27 “Procedures pertaining to mutual assistance requests in the absence of applicable international agreements”, paragraph 2.a, the central authority responsible for sending and answering requests for mutual assistance, the execution of such requests or their transmission to the authorities competent for their execution is:
The Office of Public Prosecution of Chile, International Cooperation and Extradition Unit, General Mackenna 1369, Santiago Chili."
5. "The Republic of Chile declares that, as regards to Article 35 "24/7 Network", paragraph 1, the point of contact available on a twenty-four hour, seven-day-a-week basis is:
The Office of Public Prosecution of Chile, International Cooperation and Extradition Unit, General Mackenna 1369, Santiago Chili."

Reservations made upon accession:
1. "The Republic of Chile declares that, in accordance with Article 4, paragraph 2, of the Convention on Cybercrime, it will establish as criminal offences under its domestic law, when committed intentionally, the damaging, deletion, deterioration, alteration or suppression of computer data without right, providing that this conduct results in serious harm."
2. "The Republic of Chile declares that, in accordance with Article 9, paragraph 4, of the Convention on Cybercrime, it will not apply, paragraph 2, sub-paragraphs b and c of the same article."
3. "The Republic of Chile declares that, in accordance with Article 22, paragraph 2, of the Convention on Cybercrime, it will not apply the jurisdiction rules laid down in paragraph 1.b of the same article."
4. "The Republic of Chile, in respect of Article 29, paragraph 4, of the Convention on Cybercrime, reserves the right to refuse the request for international assistance in cases where the conduct is not defined under Chilean law at the time of the request."