About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working at WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets Future of IP WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Youth Examiners Innovation Ecosystems Economics Finance Intangible Assets Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism Music Fashion PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center World Intangible Investment Highlights WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions Build Back Fund National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Staff Positions Affiliated Personnel Positions Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

India

IN073-j

Back

2025 WIPO IP Judges Forum Informal Case Summary - Delhi High Court, India [2025]: Ankur Warikoo and Another v John Doe and Others, SCC OnLine Del 3727

This is an informal case summary prepared for the purposes of facilitating exchange during the 2025 WIPO IP Judges Forum.

 

Session 6: Personality Rights

 

Delhi High Court, India [2025]: Ankur Warikoo and Another v John Doe and Others, SCC OnLine Del 3727

 

Date of judgment: May 26, 2025

Issuing authority: Delhi High Court

Level of the issuing authority: First Instance

Type of procedure: Judicial (Commercial)

Subject matter: Others

Plaintiff: Ankur Warikoo and Another

Defendant: John Doe and Others

Keywords: deepfake, personality rights, publicity rights, artificial intelligence

 

Basic facts: Ankur Warikoo (Plaintiff No. 1), a renowned personal finance educator, entrepreneur, author, and influencer with over 15.1 million followers across social media, and Zaan WebVeda Private Limited (Plaintiff No. 2), his company offering online courses under the registered trademark “Warikoo,” filed a suit for injunction against infringement of personality/publicity rights and passing off. Defendants include John Doe(s), which are unidentifiable third parties, who create, publish and make available the infringing content in the form of deep fakes featuring the Plaintiff no. 1 giving investment advice and asking his viewers to join a WhatsApp group for more such tips on stocks that would skyrocket in the upcoming days. Deepfakes surfaced around August to September 2024. Accordingly, continued circulation and/or publication of the false and misleading posts featuring the Plaintiff No. 1 and depicting the Plaintiff No. 2’s marks will have serious consequences not just for the plaintiffs but also for the public at large.

 

Held: The Court issued directions restraining John Doe(s) from misusing Plaintiff No. 1’s persona (name, likeness, image, voice) or Plaintiff No. 2’s marks in any manner whatsoever including through the use of artificial intelligence, deepfake  technology or any other technology. Meta (Defendant No. 2) was directed to forthwith remove specified infringing content within 36 hours, disclose on affidavit all available details associated with the concerned pages and deepfakes, and handle future complaints promptly.

 

Relevant holdings in relation to Personality Rights: The Delhi High Court observed that irreparable loss, harm and injury would be caused to the plaintiffs if defendant No. 1 were allowed to continue publishing/circulating the deep fake contents. The infringing actions would also have serious consequences for the public at large, namely innocent and unsuspecting investors, .

 

Relevant legislation: Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Trade Marks Act, 1999