About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

Finland

FI069

Back

Act to Safeguard the Evidence in Civil Actions Concerning Intellectual Property Rights (Act No. 344/2000 of April 7, 2000)

FI069: Intellectual Property (Evidence), Act, 07/04/2000, No. 344

Act No. 344/2000
to Safeguard the Evidence in
Civil Actions Concerning Intellectual Property Rights*

Table of Contents

The following is enacted according to a decision of Parliament:

Section 1
Scope of Application

This Act provides for the safeguarding of evidence in civil actions based on the infringement of the intellectual property rights under the following Acts:

1) the Copyright Act (No. 404 of 1961);

2) the Patent Act (No. 550 of 1967);

3) the Utility Models Act (No. 800 of 1991);

4) the Act on Exclusive Rights to an Integrated Circuit Layout-Design (No. 32 of 1991);

5) the Trade Mark Act (No. 7 of 1964);

6) the Model Rights Act (No. 221 of 1971);

7) the Trade Name Act (No. 128 of 1979); or

8) the Plant Breeder Rights Act (No. 789 of 1992).

This Act shall also apply to the safeguarding of evidence in civil actions concerning:

1) compensation for damage based on an infringement of confidentiality prescribed in subparagraphs 20 and 21 of paragraph 1 of section 24 of the Act on the Transparency of Public Officials’ Activities (No. 621 of 1999) with regard to matters covered by the Pharmaceuticals Act (No. 395 of 1987) or the Chemicals Act (No. 744 of 1989);

2) compensation for damage based on unauthorised use or disclosure of a trade secret, technical prototype or technical instruction referred to in section 4 of the Act on Improper Practices in Business (No. 1061 of 1978) or an injunction under section 6 of the Act on the said grounds.

Section 2
Content of a Precautionary Measure

In order to safeguard the evidence, a competent court may order the seizure of materials which may be presumed to have significance as evidence in a civil action referred to in section 1. In addition to, or instead of seizure, the court may order other measures, though not more severe measures than seizure, which are necessary for acquiring or preserving the evidence.

When deciding to order a precautionary measure the court shall seek to ensure that the inconvenience caused to the adversary is not excessive in view of the interest to be safeguarded.

Section 3
Requirements for a Decision on a Precautionary Measure

A precautionary measure may be ordered if:

1) the petitioner can establish a probability that he possesses the right referred to in section 1, which may be confirmed by a decision under paragraph 1 of section 1 of chapter 3 of the Execution Act (No. 37 of 1895), and that his right is being infringed or that an infringement is imminent; and

2) there is risk that the adversary or the party in possession of evidence, will conceal, destroy or relinquish the evidence or will otherwise act in a manner which will jeopardise the preservation of the evidence.

Section 4
Interim Decision on a Precautionary Measure

If the intent of a precautionary measure might otherwise be jeopardised, the court may, at the petitioner’s request, issue an interim decision on a precautionary measure without affording the adversary an opportunity to be heard. The order shall remain valid until otherwise ordered by a court.

Section 5
Enforcement of a Decision on a Precautionary Measure

An execution officer shall be entitled, where necessary, to receive official assistance from the police for the purpose of enforcing a decision on a precautionary measure. If necessary the execution officer may use the assistance of an unbiased expert in the enforcement of a decision on a precautionary measure. The disqualification of an expert shall be governed by the provisions of section 47 of chapter 17 of the Code of Judicial Procedure concerning the disqualification of an expert. The petitioner or the representative of the petitioner may, however, act as an expert if there is no likelihood that this will not lead to the disclosure of a trade secret not pertaining to the matter.

Before inviting an expert, the execution officer shall reserve the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. The adversary shall also be reserved an opportunity to be heard unless the matter concerns the enforcement of an interim decision on a precautionary measure.

An execution officer shall have the right to take photographs, copies and samples, to make audio and video recordings and to take other measures necessary to enforce a decision on a precautionary measure. Enforcement shall be executed in a manner causing the least possible inconvenience to the adversary or to the party in possession of the property.

Enforcement of the precautionary measures under this Act shall also comply as applicable with the provisions of chapter 7 of the Execution Act concerning the enforcement of a security measure ordered under chapter 7 of the Code of Judicial Procedure.

Section 6
Obligation of Secrecy

An expert referred to in this Act and a petitioner who has acquired confidential information in his capacity as a litigant shall be governed by the obligation of secrecy and prohibition on exploitation enacted in the Act on the Transparency of Public Officials’ Activities.

Section 7
Supplementary Provisions

Otherwise, the provisions regarding precautionary measures in chapter 7 of the Code of Judicial Procedure shall apply to the precautionary measures referred to in this Act.

Section 8
Entry into Force

This Act shall enter into force on May 1, 2000.

Done at Helsinki on April 7, 2000

TARJA HALONEN President of the Republic

Suvi Linden, Minister of Culture

*Note: An unofficial translation. Valid only in Finnish or Swedish.