About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Branded Hashtags: The Next Big Thing?

September 2014

By Randy Michels, Partner, Stites & Harbison, PLLC, USA, and co-founder of the Trademarkology blog

Merriam-Webster announced on May 19, 2014, in a press release that it was adding the word “hashtag” to the dictionary. “Hashtag” is defined as:

"a word or phrase preceded by the symbol # that classifies or categorizes the accompanying text (such as a tweet)".

Conveniently, the press release provides an example of proper hashtag usage: “Join the New Words conversation on Twitter using hashtag #MW2014NewWords.”

The hashtag phenomenon has created new branding opportunities. It is now common for TV shows to promote themselves through branded hashtags. Singing shows like NBC’s The Voice and Fox’s American Idol are known for their extensive use of hashtags.

The hashtag phenomenon is creating new branding opportunities. Thanks to Birds Eye, you can also literally eat hashtags with its Mashtags fried potato snacks. (Photo: © Birds Eye)

Consumer product companies are also getting in on the act. Frozen food maker Birds Eye recently launched a pop-up restaurant that allows customers to pay for their meals by posting photos of their meals on Instagram with the hashtag #BirdsEyeInspirations. Thanks to Birds Eye, you can also literally eat hashtags with its Mashtags fried potato snacks.

The increased usage of hashtags has led to a number of new trademark application filings. #RISETOTHRIVE, and #HELMETSARECOOL are recent examples. One particularly enterprising applicant even tried to obtain trademark protection in the US for the word “hashtag” in connection with TV advertising; various electronic transmission and broadcasting services; and entertainment services such as development, distribution and production of programs, contest and incentive award programs for people who contribute to shows and other interactive entertainment programs.

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected the application on the grounds that it was merely descriptive of the applicant’s services “because it immediately tells consumers that the interactive nature of these services involves the use of hashtags, as that term is widely used by others in the industry.” In hashtag parlance, the application was a #fail.

The popularity of hashtags shows no signs of letting up. Therefore, it is important for brand owners to consider the use of hashtags in their branding strategies. If the decision is made to use branded hashtags, then it would be wise to seek trademark protection to effectively protect your reputation and prevent consumer confusion. Otherwise, you might find yourself #notwinning.

The WIPO Magazine is intended to help broaden public understanding of intellectual property and of WIPO’s work, and is not an official document of WIPO. The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WIPO concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This publication is not intended to reflect the views of the Member States or the WIPO Secretariat. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by WIPO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.