About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Committee Meetings

August 2006

Appointment of Top Management Team

Member States in the WIPO Coordination Committee approved by consensus on June 20 the proposals put forward by WIPO Director General Kamil Idris for a new senior management team. With the exception of one Deputy Director General appointment, these posts have been filled from within the Organization, so facilitating continuity in the management structure. The appointments are effective from December 1, 2006, to November 30, 2009.

The Committee noted that all the candidates are well qualified for the proposed positions. The Director General and the Coordination Committee paid warm tributes to the outgoing Deputy Directors General, Mrs. Rita Hayes of the U.S.A. and Mr. Geoffrey Yu of Singapore, with praise for the dedication and commitment to excellence with which they served WIPO.

Dr. Idris said he shared the concern, referred to by several delegations, that equitable geographical distribution and gender balance should be respected in WIPO staffing. He noted that much progress had been made in this regard since his appointment as DG in November 1997. The number of member countries represented in the staff of WIPO rose from 68 in December 1997 to 94 in May 2006, representing an increase of 28 percent.

Dr. Idris also noted that the number of female staff in the professional and higher categories had been 63 out of 209 (30 percent) in December 1997, compared to 184 out of 433 (42 percent) in May 2006, an increase of 12 percent.

   

The new team consists of the following Deputy Directors General:

  • Mr. Philippe Petit (France) (reappointed),
  • Mr. Francis Gurry (Australia) (reappointed),
  • Mr. Narendra Kumar Sabharwal (India),
  • Mr. Michael Keplinger (United States of America).

And of the following Assistant Directors General:

  • Mr. Ernesto Rubio (Uruguay) (reappointed),
  • Mr. Geoffrey Onyeama (Nigeria),
  • Ms. Binying Wang (China).

________________________________

General Assembly to Decide Future Work on a Development Agenda

The Provisional Committee on Proposals related to a WIPO Development Agenda (PCDA), which met from June 26 to 30, decided to refer a decision on the future work of a development agenda for WIPO to the WIPO General Assembly, which will meet in September.

At its last meeting in February 2006, discussions on establishing a development agenda for WIPO resulted in agreement on a structure for future work under six main themes, grouping 111 proposals that were submitted by Member States. The Provisional Committee, which was established by the WIPO General Assembly in autumn 2005 to accelerate and complete discussions on this matter, agreed that the six theme structure would be the basis for continued discussions.

At this meeting, the PCDA discussed the proposals categorized under the different themes and Member States expressed their specific concerns in respect of these subjects. They highlighted the need to arrive at early decisions so that the process could be taken forward. A few proposals were made with regard to the future work program and recommendations to be submitted to the General Assembly. Delegations discussed them in detail and decided to leave this question to the General Assembly.

All delegations acknowledged the importance of the issues raised during the development agenda process and the need to continue discussions on how to enhance the development dimension in all of WIPO’s work.
 

The WIPO Magazine is intended to help broaden public understanding of intellectual property and of WIPO’s work, and is not an official document of WIPO. The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WIPO concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This publication is not intended to reflect the views of the Member States or the WIPO Secretariat. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by WIPO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.