About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

PCT Receiving Office Guidelines

Chapter VII: Priority Claims and Priority Documents

Correction or Addition of Priority Claim on the Applicant’s Own Initiative

173. A priority claim may be corrected or added on the applicant’s own initiative by a notice submitted to the receiving Office or the International Bureau within the time limit provided for under Rule 26bis.1(a); the correction of a priority claim made by the applicant may include the addition of any indication referred to in Rule 4.10 (Rule 26bis.1(a)).

174. Where the applicant furnishes such indications to the receiving Office, that Office enters them in the space provided therefor in the request and, as to markings in the margin, it proceeds as outlined in paragraph 170.

175. Where the priority claim, as corrected or added, does not comply with the requirements of Rule 4.10 and the time limit for correction (Rule 26bis.1(a)) has not yet expired, the receiving Office invites the applicant to correct the (remaining) defect(s) (Form PCT/RO/110).

176. Where, after the expiration of the time limit under Rule 26bis.1(a), a priority claim still does not comply with the requirements under Rule 4.10 (see paragraph 171), it is, for the purposes of the PCT procedure, considered void (Rule 26bis.2) and the receiving Office proceeds as set out in Rule 26bis.2(b), Section 302 and paragraph 172, provided that corrections furnished by the applicant after the expiration of that time limit, but before the receiving Office makes the declaration under Rule 26bis.2(b) and not later than one month after the expiration of the time limit, are considered to have been received before the expiration of that time limit. Moreover, in respect of a priority claim which on the face of it complies with the requirements of Rule 4.10 or which, because of the operation of Rule 26bis.2(c)(i) or (ii), could not be considered void, any correction furnished by the applicant after the expiration of the time limit under Rule 26bis.1(a) but not later than one month after the expiration of the time limit, is considered to have been received before the expiration of that time limit (Rule 26bis.2(b)).

176A. Where the applicant furnishes information concerning a priority claim to be added after the expiration of that time limit, the receiving Office declares (Form PCT/RO/111) that the priority claim cannot be added since the applicable time limit has expired (Form PCT/RO/111).

177. Where corrections and/or additions are received by the receiving Office after the expiration of the time limit provided for under Rule 26bis.1(a), and, where applicable, after the receiving Office has made the declaration under Rule 26bis.2(b), and are therefore not to be taken into account, the receiving Office draws the applicant’s attention (Form PCT/RO/111) to the possibility of requesting the International Bureau, prior to the expiration of 30 months from the priority date and subject to the payment of a special fee (Section 113(c)), to publish information concerning the matter (Rule 26bis.2(e)).

178. [Deleted] .