About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: Brands Report 2009
Author: [Marks & Clerk LLP]
Source:

http://www.marks-clerk.com/uk/attorneys/publications/reports.html

Year: 2009

Details

Subject/Type: Counterfeiting
Focus: Brands (non-deceptive counterfeits)
Country/Territory: United Kingdom
Objective: To find out about commercial challenges currently faced by businesses, the role of brands, and their protection and valorisation.
Sample: 222 UK businesses, with an emphasis on mid-ranking to senior business people
Methodology: Online survey

Main Findings

UK businesses overwhelmingly agree that counterfeiting is likely to increase in economic downturns (97%), helped by rising demand (95%) and the growing importance of the Internet (80%), in particular of online market places. Correspondingly, 75% think that stronger protection is needed to safeguard companies in online market places.

Measures recommended to combat Internet (trademark) infringements include: “a more powerful cybercrime authority, with stiffer penalties for infringers” (61%), “the creation of a protocol to engage search engines with the fight against counterfeiters” (59%), “imposing stronger penalties on secondary markets like eBay” (56%), and “allocation of more resources to the problem by companies themselves” (40%).

Economic downturns also have an impact on preventive action against counterfeiting: 80% respondents consider that the progress made educating consumers about counterfeiting may be undone in difficult economic circumstances.

[Date Added: Aug 10, 2009 ]