About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Use and Awareness

Reference

Title: Use of Patent Information: Empirical Evidence from Innovative SMEs
Author: Enno Masurel [VU University Amsterdam]
Source:

ftp://zappa.ubvu.vu.nl/20050002.pdf

Year: 2005

Details

Subject/Type: IP Knowledge
Focus: Patents
Country/Territory: Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
Objective: To study the use of patent information by innovative small and medium-sized enterprises.
Sample: 15 directors of innovative SMEs
Methodology: Questionnaire, in-depth interviews

Main Findings

Using patent information may be very important for businesses: it can yield inspiration for innovations, inform on the state of the art concerning specific products and processes, and reveal the progress of competitors and other market players. However, just 53% of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) surveyed reported having used patent information in the last 12 months. Likely, the real number of patent information users is considerably lower than 53%, because quite a number of would-be respondents declined to participate in the study, stating that they had nothing to do with patents/patent information.

Larger SMEs, SMEs with highly educated directors, SMEs undertaking market research and SMEs using patents were most likely to have used patent information. Reasons given for using patent information are: “mapping competitors’ activities” (cited by 75% of patent information users), followed by “investigating the possibility of patenting an invention” (75%), “inspiration and problem solving” (62.5%), “keeping informed about technical progress” (50%), and “checking possible patent rights violations” (37.5%). No respondent mentioned “finding new licensing possibilities” as a reason. The two most often used methods of searching for patent information were searching on the Internet and assistance of a patent attorney.

Just 28% of non-users of patent information reported wanting to make more use of it. Reasons given for not using patent information are: “high costs” (cited by 71.4% of non-users of patent information), followed by “unclear procedures” (57.2%), “lack of time” (42.9%), and “not familiar with patent information” (42.9%). “Use of the Internet and CDROMS” and “development of user-friendly interfaces” were considered helpful in promoting the use of patent information.

Given the usefulness of patent information, the author recommends that the use of patent information be promoted through national intellectual property offices, trade associations and educational institutions.

[Date Added: May 1, 2009 ]