About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: POLLARA Survey
Author: [POLLARA]
Source:

Canadian Anti-Counterfeiting Network
http://www.cacn.ca/PDF/CACN%20Releases/CACN%20Release%20-%20English%20-%2002-27.pdf

Year: 2007

Details

Subject/Type: Counterfeiting, Piracy
Focus: Apparel and Shoes, Brands (deceptive counterfeits), Brands (non-deceptive counterfeits), Consumer Electronics / Electronic Equipment, Fashion Accessories, Film, Medicines and Medical Devices, Software, Watches
Country/Territory: Canada
Objective: To better understand the extent of counterfeiting and piracy in Canada.
Sample: 2.034 randomly selected Canadian households with Internet access
Methodology: Online survey

Main Findings

28% of respondents admitted to having knowingly purchased counterfeit products, and an additional 12% had bought goods without realising that they were counterfeits. 86% would be less likely to purchase counterfeits when informed of the links between counterfeiting and organised crime. 90% agree that the low chances of being caught contribute to the selling/buying of counterfeits.

The study also found low awareness concerning the wide range of everyday products affected by counterfeiting. Almost half of consumers who bought pirated music (43%), movies (45%) and software (44%) would have purchased the original product if they had not purchased the counterfeit.

Respondents favoured heavy fines (70%) and jail time (43%) as deterrents to counterfeiting. Respondents have bought counterfeit clothes (41%), watches (28%), sunglasses (25%), handbags/purses (21%), movies (20%) and software (17%). The quality of counterfeits compared to original products was mostly perceived as "a lot poorer" (55%) though 34% considered the quality to be the same.

[Date Added: Aug 12, 2008 ]