About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: An investigation of determinants of counterfeit purchase consideration
Author: Xuemei Bian [University of Hull] and Luiz Moutinho [University of Glasgow]
Source:

Journal of Business Research 62, no. 3: 368-378

Year: 2009

Details

Subject/Type: Counterfeiting
Focus: Brands (non-deceptive counterfeits), Luxury Goods, Watches
Country/Territory: United Kingdom
Objective: To investigate determinants of the likelihood of considering the purchase of non-deceptive counterfeit branded products.
Sample: 321 shoppers in Glasgow
Methodology: Self-administered questionnaire distributed through the "mall intercept" method

Main Findings

The more positively consumers perceive the brand personality and product attributes of counterfeit Rolex and Gucci watches, the more likely they are to consider buying them.

The higher consumers perceive social risk (risk of being socially stigmatised when detected wearing a counterfeit watch) associated with counterfeit Rolex and Gucci watches, the less likely they are to consider buying them.

Additional factors influencing the likelihood of buying counterfeit Rolex or Gucci watches are brand category-specific: while perceived image benefit and financial risk influence the consideration of buying fake Gucci watches (given that Gucci is a fashionable luxury brand, the main consumer concern is whether or not the counterfeit version looks like the originals), satisfactory and functional benefit have more of an effect when it comes to buying fake Rolex watches (given that Rolex is a top-end luxury functional product).

The level of product involvement of the consumer and demographic variables (education, age, gender) were not found to influence the likelihood of buying either fake Rolex or Gucci watches.

The importance of brand personality when it comes to deciding whether to buy counterfeit luxury watches indicates that there is a greater chance that consumers will make a purchase of counterfeits over originals when they perceive the counterfeits as possessing a similar kind of brand personality. Manufacturers of original luxury goods should therefore try to differentiate their brand personality as much as possible from that of the counterfeit versions by emphasising the brand personality difference between the genuine and the counterfeit branded products. Typical users, brand endorsers, company employees and the company CEO are all able to influence consumer-perceived brand personality. Marketers should make clear the idea that the typical counterfeit users, counterfeit company employees and owners do not possess the identified personality traits (of the original brand), or even possess opposite or negative traits.

Original manufacturers should also emphasise the distinctive image benefits of genuine goods, and/or even the negative image benefits of counterfeits. Establishing a genuine, green and environmentally friendly image for the branded product can also be helpful.

[Date Added: Feb 19, 2009 ]