About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: Olswang Convergence Consumer Survey 2007
Author: [YouGov]
Source:

Olswang
http://www.olswang.com/convergence07/default.asp

Year: 2007

Details

Subject/Type: Piracy
Focus: Film, Music
Country/Territory: United Kingdom
Objective: To examine consumers' attitudes to piracy and DRM.
Sample: 1.793 GB consumers, aged 13 to 55
Methodology: Online survey

Main Findings

Most respondents are aware of the fact that it is illegal to download unauthorised copies of music (with 75% thinking it is illegal), movies (73%) or TV programmes (67%). Ripping DVDs or CDs onto a computer is illegal according to 33% and 30% of respondents respectively. 26% think that transferring music/video copied onto a computer from CDs/DVDs to a portable device is against the law.

14% of respondents stream, download or copy music illegally. Illegal film and TV programmes copies are made by 6% and 5% respectively. 27% report that they are “not aware” of doing so. 49% do not engage in illegal downloading. The percentage of illegal downloaders increases with age up to the 18-24 age group, and thereafter declines with age.

The top reasons for not streaming, downloading or copying music, films or TV programmes illegally are: “it’s wrong” (34%), “I would prefer to get a higher quality copy from an authorised service provider, even if I have to pay for this” (33%), “I would not know where to find it” (19%), “I am worried about getting caught” (15%), and “it’s too difficult” (6%).

While 33% agree that is fair for copyright holders to use digital rights management (DRM) to make sure that people cannot use the content they have not paid for, just 8% think that it is fair for copyright holders to use DRM to limit the ways people can use the content they have paid for. 71% think that they should be able to use purchased content on all of the devices they own. More than half (53%) want to be able to make back-up copies of content they have bought. Still, only 12% agree that they should be able to give copies of purchased content to their friends for free for use on their devices.

[Date Added: Jan 20, 2009 ]