About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: Money for Nothing and Hits for Free: The Ethics of Downloading Music from Peer-To-Peer Web Sites 
Author: Aron M Levin, Mary Conway Dato-on and Kenneth Rhee [Northern Kentucky University]
Source:

Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice  12, no. 1: 48-60

Year: 2004

Details

Subject/Type: Piracy
Focus: Music
Country/Territory: United States of America
Objective: To determine the ethical attitudes of college students towards: downloading music without paying, record companies and recording artists.
Sample: College students: 21 for the qualitative study and 210 for the quantitative study
Methodology: Qualitative preliminary study: students wrote a reaction paper to an article about the Napster controversy for their Marketing course. Quantitative main study: a questionnaire based on the results from the preliminary study, completed during class for extra credit

Main Findings

Compared to those who have not illegally downloaded music from the Internet, downloaders: have lesser ethical concern; are more likely to believe that downloading does not harm record companies/artists; are more likely to agree that record companies are making excessive profits; are more likely to use high-speed Internet connections; have larger CD collections; and have purchased more CDs in the past 6 months.

Downloading music is not always a substitute for purchasing and may actually be a form of product sampling. While downloaders were more likely to agree that record companies are making excessive profits, they are not more likely to agree that artists are making excessive profits.

[Date Added: Aug 12, 2008 ]