About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: Les Français, la contrefaçon et le piratage
Author: [Ifop]
Source:

Union des Fabricants
http://www.unifab.com/doc/2006/ifop_2006.ppt

Year: 2005

Details

Subject/Type: Counterfeiting, Piracy
Focus: Aircraft and Auto Parts, Apparel and Shoes, Beverages, Brands (non-deceptive counterfeits), Consumer Electronics / Electronic Equipment, Fashion Accessories, Film, Food Products, Furniture, Medicines and Medical Devices, Music, Personal Care Products, Software, Tobacco Products, Toys, Video Games, Watches
Country/Territory: France
Objective: To understand consumer perceptions, attitudes and behaviour towards counterfeit and pirated products.
Sample: 1.001 adults representative of the French population
Methodology: Face-to-face interviews in respondents' homes

Main Findings

The most desired fake goods are clothes, with 18% having bought them and a further 13% willing to buy fake fashion if given the chance. 65% claim that they have never bought counterfeits, while 22% have bought 1-3 fake products. 67% bought fakes due to lower price, 19% due to perception of well-executed copying and 18% to have a "brand" product that they could not otherwise afford.

49% do not buy fakes because of their illegality and fear of being fined, and 43% do not do so due to perceived lower quality. Around 90% approve of sanctions for those selling, distributing and producing fakes, but only 49% approve of sanctions for those who purchase fakes. The awareness of legal sanctions is high, and social, economic and health risks are associated with fakes.

However, 67% viewed counterfeits as a way of bringing to the masses products usually reserved for an elite, 55% thought they served as publicity for brands and 50% felt that they were a form of competition forcing brands to innovate. Illegal downloading was perceived as serious if done for reselling (80%), but as less serious if done for friends and family (45%) or personal use (32%).

[Date Added: Aug 12, 2008 ]