About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Creation

Reference

Title: Innovation in New Zealand: 2007
Author: [Statistics New Zealand]
Source:

http://www.stats.govt.nz/analytical-reports/innovation-new-zealand-2007.htm

Year: 2008

Details

Subject/Type: Innovation
Focus: Barriers, Impact
Country/Territory: New Zealand
Objective: To give a statistical picture of business innovation and performance in New Zealand.
Sample: 5.728 businesses
Methodology: Postal survey

Main Findings

Over the last two financial years, as at August 2007, innovation activity was reported by 47% of New Zealand businesses (versus 52% in 2005). Larger firms were more likely to be innovating than smaller ones. Almost half of innovating businesses spent less than 1 percent of their total expenditure on innovation activities. About a third spent between one and five percent.

The most innovative sectors were communication services (with 73% of businesses innovating during the last two financial years), cultural/recreational services (61%), and finance and insurance (59%). The least innovative sectors were construction (38%), agriculture/forestry/fishing (34%), and mining and quarrying (31%).

Businesses cited “lack of management resources (e.g. time)”, “lack of appropriate personnel”, “costs to develop or introduce”, “government regulation”, and “lack of marketing expertise” as the main barriers to innovation.

Top reasons for undertaking innovation were increasing revenue (cited by 87% of innovating firms), reducing costs (71%), increasing market share (68%), improving productivity (66%), and increasing customer responsiveness (59%).

The most commonly reported sources of ideas or information for innovative activities were “existing staff” (at 70%), followed by “customers” (57%), “new staff” (51%), “suppliers” (47%), and “conferences, trade shows or exhibitions” (46%). The least often cited sources were “government agencies” (13%), “crown research institutes, other research institutes or research associations” (13%), and “universities or polytechnics” (9%).

Compared to non-innovators, innovating firms were more successful in all business performance measures, from increases in sales (reported by 65% of innovators and 51% of non-innovators), to increases in profitability (48% versus 40%), increases in productivity (48% versus 32%), and increases in market share (36% versus 21%).

[Date Added: Nov 20, 2008 ]