About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Use and Awareness

Reference

Title: Intellectual Property Rights in Russia - A Survey of Russian and International Brand Holders
Author: [The PBN Company]
Source:

The Coalition for Intellectual Property Rights (CIPR)
http://www.cipr.org/activities/findings/index.htm

Year: 2006

Details

Subject/Type: IP Protection
Focus: Economic / Financial Impact, Enforcement
Country/Territory: Russian Federation
Objective: To assess the current intellectual property situation in Russia.
Sample: 102 international and Russian rightholders, and 81 companies/trade associations
Methodology: Surveys

Main Findings

In 2006, 59% of some of the largest brand owners in Russia said that the country’s intellectual property (IP) laws had improved over the past five years; nearly 30% perceived no change, and 13% said that the situation had worsened.

According to 48% of those surveyed, counterfeiting has increased over the past five years; 37% observed a decline and 15% no change. Over 40% of IP owners either did not know or refused to say whether their own products are counterfeited. Of those responding, only 8% affirmed that their products are not counterfeited. 47% said that counterfeits are manufactured primarily in Russia, while 41% cited China (with the remainder going to Ukraine, Belarus and other countries). Estimated costs of IP crime are substantial: 40% reported annual losses over U$1.000.000; about 10% said that their annual costs exceed U$25.000.000 annually.

The most important IP issues for rightholders in Russia are: enforcing IP rights (66%), fighting counterfeiting and piracy (57%), and stopping bad faith trademark registrations (53%). They also want the government to focus on strict enforcement of existing IP legislation, rather than on making changes to IP laws currently in force.

Rightholder recommendations for authorities include “cleaning up corruption in law enforcement” (85%), “joint enforcement actions by law enforcement authorities and IP owners” (76%), “educating consumers and media about IPR issues” (74%), and “training judges” (72%). However, few respondents perceived IP protection as a priority of the Russian government, and even fewer said that government agencies for IP protection/enforcement are effective.

During 2005, 73% of rightholders surveyed registered trademarks; 43% took administrative actions to enforce intellectual property rights (IPRs); 33% took court actions to enforce IPRs, or filed for patent protection; and about one in three respondents conducted independent or joint anti-counterfeiting raids with government authorities.

[Date Added: Oct 21, 2008 ]