About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Use and Awareness

Reference

Title: Use of Patents in Securing Financing: A Survey of New England Firms
Author: Venky Venkatachalam [University of New Hampshire]
Source:

http://wsbe2.unh.edu/files/Survey_Summary_FINAL.pdf

Year: 2007

Details

Subject/Type: IP Protection
Focus: Economic / Financial Impact, Patents
Country/Territory: United States of America
Objective: To assess the extent to which small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in New England use intellectual property assets to secure financing to manage their operations.
Sample: 51 New England firms
Methodology: Mail survey

Main Findings

78% of the small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) surveyed either held title to patent(s) or had patent application(s) or provisional patent application(s) pending at the time the survey was taken. Patents were mostly developed in-house (75%), licensed from others (17%), acquired through a merger/acquisition (4%), or purchased (4%).

43% of the firms surveyed own between 1-5 patents; 21% own between 6-25 patents; and 6% more than 25 patents. In a typical year, 49% reported filing between 1-5 patents with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), while 12% reported no filings, and 6% reported filing 6-10 patent applications.

In a typical year, 16% of respondents reported filing between 1-5 international (PCT) patent applications, 14% filed no international patent applications, and 2% filed between 6-10 applications. Over the past three years, 13% reported filing no international patent applications; 12% filed fewer than 6 applications; 4% filed between 6-10 applications, and 3% filed between 11-50 international applications.

Patents are mostly used to improve new or existing products (27%), but also to be sold (8%), to be licensed out (3%), or to create joint ventures (2%). Most firms surveyed have never sold their patents to others (57%) – just 6% had sold between 1-5 patents. Licensing is slightly more popular than selling: while 49% have never licensed their patents to others, 15% had licensed between 1-6 patents. 12% had licensed between 1-5 patents from others, and 6% between 6-10 patents. 47% of companies reported never buying a patent license.

18% of the companies surveyed said they had used patents as collateral to secure financing, while 61% had not. 47% of respondents said they had not used patents as collateral to obtain equity financing; 6% indicated using it to obtain less than $500,000; 4% between $1-3 million. 22% of the companies planned to use patents as collateral in the future while 29% did not. 14% of the respondents were not sure.

The author concludes that SMEs use Patents mainly as a tool to enhance competitive advantage through the development of new products and/or the improvement of existing products. A major obstacle to using intellectual property as collateral does seem to be the inability of many venture capital firms to assess the commercial value of patents.

[Date Added: Feb 3, 2010 ]