About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: Consumer Home Piracy Research Findings July 2008
Author: [Futuresource Consulting]
Source:

http://www.futuresource-consulting.com/press/2008-07_HomeCopyingWhitePaper.pdf

Year: 2008

Details

Subject/Type: Piracy
Focus: Film
Country/Territory: United Kingdom, United States of America
Objective: To get an idea of the revenue loss resulting from home copying of DVDs, and to understand the impact of deterring consumers from copying.
Sample: 3.613 US consumers, and 1.718 UK consumers
Methodology: Online survey

Main Findings

In 2008, around one third of American and British consumers reported making copies of pre-recorded DVDs, compared to just over a quarter in 2007. In the 6 months preceding the survey, DVD copiers had copied about a dozen titles (12 in the US, and 13 in the UK). New release titles were copied more often than catalogue/library titles.

Copiers of DVDs used both analogue and digital copying methods, with the two being of almost equal importance. The rate of successful copying of blockbuster movie titles was higher in the US than in Britain (57% versus 34%).

If unable to make copies of DVDs, 63% of respondents in the UK and 77% in the US would have purchased all, some, or at least a few of the titles copied. The preferred option for buying them would be at sale or promotional price.

[Date Added: Aug 22, 2008 ]