About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Use and Awareness

Reference

Title: Survey of intellectual property teaching
Author: [UK Centre for Legal Education]
Source:

http://www.ukcle.ac.uk/research/projects/soetendorp2.html

Year: 2005

Details

Subject/Type: IP Knowledge
Focus: Outreach / Education
Country/Territory: Australia, United Kingdom
Objective: To learn about the extent of intellectual property teaching in engineering faculties.
Sample: A small group of British and Australian engineering professors
Methodology: Survey

Main Findings

British and Australian engineering professors consider a wide array of persons "best to teach intellectual property (IP) law", including: people with legal backgrounds (university lawyers, patent attorneys, and IP law academics), technology/knowledge transfer office staff, engineering academics, and local businesspersons. Preferred delivery styles and resources for IP teaching are: lectures, course notes and handouts, government texts, case studies, UK Patent Office and other web-based resources, games, and lecturers materials.

According to the professors surveyed, every engineering graduate should at least have the following knowledge about IP: a broad understanding of IP; awareness of implications surrounding disclosure and confidentiality, and of linkages between IP, innovation and business development; awareness of cultural differences between academic research and business environments; and general knowledge (how not to be taken advantage of in IP matters, whom to ask for advice, where to find information).

Students at a more sophisticated level should, inter alia, have the following IP knowledge: "what goes into a patent application and why"; relevance of patents; non disclosure agreements; (inter)national IP issues; offensive and defensive patent strategies; IP commercialisation and exploitation; and open source licensing and other "alternative" regimes.

Particular attention was drawn to the fact that teaching should not be uncritical (especially concerning patents) and involve role models and case studies. The ideal learning outcome will consist of the acquisition of a mixture of attitude, competence and knowledge regarding IP.

[Date Added: Aug 18, 2008 ]