About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Use and Awareness

Reference

Title: Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Knowledge, Use, and Attitudes of Academic Librarians
Author: Dean Hendrix [State University of New York at Buffalo]
Source:

Libraries and the Academy 7, no. 2: 191-212

Year: 2007

Details

Subject/Type: IP Knowledge
Focus: Access to Information, Copyright, Enforcement
Country/Territory: United States of America
Objective: To assess the knowledge base, use, and attitudes of academic librarians regarding P2P technologies.
Sample: 162 academic librarians
Methodology: Mail-in questionnaire

Main Findings

Results indicate that American academic librarians do not generally exhibit extensive knowledge of peer-to-peer (P2P) technologies (a below average knowledge grade of 49%; nearly half of all knowledge questions answered with "not sure"). Furthermore, they do not or did not very much use P2P technologies (about a third of the respondents indicated use of at least one of the listed P2P applications; 90% of them never used eight out of nine P2P applications listed).

Attitudes of academic librarians toward P2P are largely neutral or indifferent, especially in regard to questions directly related to workplace implications (half of the sample did not have an opinion on the role P2P might play in libraries, and did not state whether libraries should adopt the technology to provide services). However, they seem to be aware of positive and negative potentialities of P2P: 66% believe that P2P facilitates piracy, and 74% think that P2P facilitates collaborative work; very few respondents are in favour of blocking or criminalising P2P.

[Date Added: Aug 18, 2008 ]