About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

IP Outreach Research > IP Crime

Reference

Title: The 2006 Digital Music Survey
Author: Russell Hart and Steve Evans [Entertainment Media Research]
Source:

http://www.entertainmentmediaresearch.com/reports/digitalmusicsurvey_2006.pdf

Year: 2006

Details

Subject/Type: Piracy
Focus: Music
Country/Territory: United Kingdom
Objective: To test consumer tastes and purchasing behaviour.
Sample: 3.000+ music consumers
Methodology: Online survey

Main Findings

13% of downloaders have stopped buying music CDs, 30% buy fewer CDs and 13% buy more. 26% sample music online before purchasing a CD. 59% of legal downloaders buy downloads in order to get music immediately. Generally, CDs are still perceived to be more valuable than downloads. Reasons for not downloading include: perceived as too expensive (30%), concern with virus/security (19%), need more information on how it works (19%).

Illegal downloading only decreased from 40% in 2005 to 36% in 2006. 56% of illegal downloaders (but only 50% of teens) claim they will download less in the future. Most consumers are not fully clear on the laws about downloading: 70% have a rough understanding of the law, 20% a poor one and 13% none at all. 64% of both legal and illegal downloaders are "concerned" about the law. However, 26% of downloaders with a complete or good understanding of the law reported that they "couldn't care less" about it.

[Date Added: Aug 12, 2008 ]