Title: | Section 86 of the Intellectual Property Act No. 36 of 2003 |
Field of IP: | Patents |
Type of flexibility: | Compulsory licenses and government use |
Summary table: |
86. (1) The provisions of section 84 shall-
(i) extend only to acts done for industrial or commercial purposes and in particular shall not extend to acts done only for the purpose of scientific research ;
(ii) not preclude a person having the rights referred to in section 87 or a licensee, from exploiting the patented invention ;
(iii) not extend to the presence or use of products on foreign vessels, aircraft, spacecraft, or land vehicles which temporarily or accidentally enter the waters, airspace or territory of Sri Lanka ;
(iv) not extend to acts in respect of articles which have been put in the market by the owner of the patent or by a manufacturer under licence.
(2) (a) Any person, body of persons, a government department or a statutory body may make an application to the Director General for the purpose of obtaining a licence to exploit a patent in the manner hereafter provided.
(b) Upon the receipt of such application, the Director General may issue a license for exploitation if he is satisfied that the applicant has made efforts to obtain approval from the right holder on reasonable commercial terms and conditions and that such efforts have not been successful within a reasonable period of time.
(c) Director-General may waive the requirements set out in paragraph (b) where he has satisfied himself of the existence of a national emergency or any other circumstances of extreme urgency or in case of public non-commercial use for the purposes such as national security, nutrition, health or for the development of others vital section of the national economy.
(d) The exploitation of the patent shall be limited in scope and duration to the purpose as is specified in the licence. Such exploitation shall be predominantly for the purpose of supply to the domestic market.
(e) The Director-General shall consider each application on its individual merits before granting a licence to exploit a patent.
(f) The issuance of a licence shall be non-exclusive and subject to the payment of adequate remuneration to the owner of the patent taking into consideration the economic value as determined by the Director-General, and where applicable, the need to correct anti competitive practices.
(g) Where such application is for the exploitation of the patent (the second patent) which cannot be exploited without infringing another patent (the first patent), the following conditions shall apply :
(i) the invention claimed in the second patent shall involve and important technical advance of considerable economic significance in relation to the invention claimed in the first patent ;
(ii) the owner of the first patent shall be entitled to a cross licence on reasonable terms to exploit the invention claimed in the second patent ; and
(iii) the exploitation authorized in respect of the first patent shall be non-assignable except with the assignment of the second patent.
(h) The decision of the Director-General, shall be notified in writing to the owner of the patent as soon as practicable.
(i) The Director-General, shall upon, the request of the owner or of the beneficiary of the licence, after hearing the parties, vary his decision by amending the terms subject to which licence for the exploitation of the patent is issued to the extent only that the changed circumstances justify such variation.
(j) The Director-General shall upon the request of the owner, terminate the non-voluntary license if he is satisfied that the circumstances which led to his decision have ceased to exist and are unlikely to recur or that the license has failed to comply with terms of such licence.
(k) Notwithstanding anything contained in paragraph, (j) the Director-General shall not terminate a licence, if he is satisfied that adequate protection of the legitimate interest of the beneficiary of the licence justifies the continuity of such licence.
(l) The licence to exploit a patent may be transferred only with the enterprise or the business of the licencee of such patent or with the part of such enterprise or business, in relation to which the licence to exploit has been granted.
(m) Where a judicial or administrative body has determined that the manner of exploitation of a patent by its owner or its licensee is anti-competitive, and the Director-General is satisfied that the exploitation of a patent in accordance with this section would remedy such practice, the Director-General may authorize any person, body of persons, government departments or statutory body to exploit the patent without a licence of the owner of the patent. The provisions of the above paragraphs except those of paragraphs (b), (c) and (g) shall be applicable to such licence.
(3) Any person aggrieved by any decision of the Director-General under subsection (2), may tender an appeal therefrom. The provisions of section 173 shal1, mutatis mutandis, apply in respect of such appeal.