Legislative Implementation of Flexibilities - Georgia

Title:	Sections 26 (3) and (4), 42 (1) (d) and 57 (1) (b) of the Patent Law of 05/02/1999
Field of IP:	Patents
Type of flexibility:	Disclosure related flexibilities
Summary table:

Provisions of Law

26 (3) The description of the invention and utility model shall be filed in respect to the established rule and in full form as to enable the skilled person in the art to realize it.

(4) If the application concerns the biological reproducible material, which cannot be described in the application completely as to enable the skilled person to realize it or, if this biological material is not commonly available, the application shall be completed by the document confirming the deposit of the biological material issued by the Depository.

42 (1) Sakpatenti refuses the granting of a patent for the whole invention and utility model, or for its part, if the application:

(d) does not satisfy the requirement of the paragraph (3) Article 26 of this Law;

57 (1) A patent shall be considered invalid if the following is ascertained:

(b) the patent does not describe an invention, utility model and industrial design completely as to make its embodiment possible;