About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Legislative Implementation of Flexibilities - Malaysia

Title:Sections 28 (1) (c), 29A (4) and (5) (b) and 56 (2) (b) of the Patents Act No. 291 of 1983 as last amended by Act No. 1264 of 2006 and Rule 12 of the Patent Regulations P.U.(A) 327/86 as last amended on 19/06/2003
Field of IP:Patents
Type of flexibility:Disclosure related flexibilities
Summary table:PDF

Provisions of Law

Section 28. Filing date.

(1) The Registrar shall record as the filing date the date of receipt of the application: Provided that the application contains

(c) a description;

Section 29A. Request for substantive examination or modified substantive examination.

(4) The Registrar may require the applicant to provide, at the time of filing a request for a substantive examination

(a) any prescribed information or prescribed supporting document concerning the filing of any application for a patent or other title of industrial property protection filed outside Malaysia by such applicant or his predecessor in title with a national, regional or international industrial property office;

(b) any prescribed information concerning the results of any search or examination carried out by an International Searching Authority under the Patent Cooperation Treaty, relating to the same or essentially the same invention as that claimed in the application for which the request for a substantive examination is being filed.

(5) If the applicant

(b) fails to provide the information or document referred to in subsection (4) as required by the Registrar,

within the prescribed period, the application for a patent shall, subject to subsection (6), be deemed to be withdrawn at the end of that period.

Section 56. Invalidation of patent.

(2) The Court shall invalidate the patent if the person requesting the invalidation proves -

(b) that the description or the claim does not comply with the requirements of section 23;

REGULATIONS

Regulation 12. Description.

(1) The description shall first state the title of the invention as appearing in the request and shall

(a) specify the technical field to which the invention relates; (b) indicate the background art which, as far as is known to the applicant, can be regarded as useful for the understanding, searching and examination of the invention, and, wherever possible, cite the documents reflecting such art;

(c) disclose the invention in such terms that it can be understood and in a manner sufficiently clear and complete for the invention to be evaluated and to be carried out by a person having ordinary skill in the art, and state any advantageous effects of the invention with reference to the background art; (d) briefly describe figures in the drawings, if any; (e) describe the best mode contemplated by the applicant for carrying out the invention, using examples where appropriate and referring to the drawings, if any; and (f) indicate explicitly, when it is not obvious from the description or nature of the invention, the way in which the invention is industrially applicable and the way in which it can be made and used or, if it can only be used, the way in which it can be used.

(2) The description shall be presented in the manner and order specified in sub-regulation (1) unless, because of the nature of the invention, a different manner or a different order would result in a better understanding and a more economical presentation. (3) The description shall not contain drawings.