About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Legislative Implementation of Flexibilities - New Zealand

Title:Sections 10 (3), 12 (2), 21 (1) (g) and 41 (1) (h) of the Patents Act No 64 of 1953 (as at 01/01/2011)
Field of IP:Patents
Type of flexibility:Disclosure related flexibilities
Summary table:PDF

Provisions of Law

10. Contents of specification

(3) Every complete specification

(a) Shall particularly describe the invention and the method by which it is to be performed; and

(b) Shall disclose the best method of performing the invention which is known to the applicant and for which he is entitled to claim protection; and

(c) Shall end with a claim or claims defining the scope of the invention claimed.

12. Examination of application

(2) If the examiner reports that the application or any specification filed in pursuance thereof does not comply with the requirements of this Act or of any regulations made thereunder, or that there is lawful ground of objection to the grant of a patent in pursuance of the application, the Commissioner sic:

Commissioner may either

(a) Refuse to proceed with the application; or

(b) Require the application or any such specification as aforesaid to be amended before he proceeds with the application.

Commissioner may require information as to corresponding applications overseas(1) Subject to subsection (2) of this section, for the purposes of the investigation required under this Act an applicant, if so required by the Commissioner shall,

(a) State whether a corresponding or substantially corresponding application has been filed in any of the following countries, namely,

(i) The United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, or the United States of America; or

(ii) Any other country for the time being declared by Order in Council to be a country to which this paragraph applies:

(b) With respect to any such application in any such country, furnish (so far as it is reasonably available to the applicant) the following information:

(i) The number and filing date of the application; and

(ii) Particulars sufficient to identify the prior art cited against the application; and

(iii) The number allotted to the patent when granted on the application and the form of the claims allowed; and

(iv) Particulars of any other application or patent with which the corresponding application is or has been involved in opposition, conflict, interference, or similar proceedings.

21 Opposition to grant of patent

(1) At any time within the period prescribed by subsection (2) of this section any person interested may give notice to the Commissioner of opposition to the grant of the patent on any of the following grounds:

(g) That the complete specification does not sufficiently and fairly describe the invention or the method by which it is to be performed:

41 Revocation of patent by Court

(1) Subject to the provisions of this Act, a patent may, on the application of any person interested, be revoked by the Court on any of the following grounds, that is to say,

(h) That the complete specification does not sufficiently and fairly describe the invention and the method by which it is to be performed, or does not disclose the best method of performing it which was known to the applicant for the patent and for which he was entitled to claim protection.