About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for... IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making IP Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization WIPO and Artificial Intelligence Working at WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets Future of IP WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Women Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Youth Examiners Innovation Ecosystems Economics Finance Intangible Assets Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism Music Fashion PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center World Intangible Investment Highlights WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Tailored Initiatives & Projects Collaborative Forums & Dialogues Innovation, Creativity and Development Acceleration Program IP for Impact National IP Strategies Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program IP Commercialization WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Global Forum on IP and AI AI Infrastructure Interchange AI Tools & Services Staff Positions Affiliated Personnel Positions Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Legislative Implementation of Flexibilities - Mongolia

Title:Article 10 of the Patent Law of 25/06/1993, as last amended in 1999
Field of IP:Patents
Type of flexibility:Substantive examination
Summary table:PDF

Provisions of Law

Article 10

Examination of patent application

1. After recording of the filing date, the [Intellectual Property Office shall examine the invention or industrial design to determine if it complies with the requirements of Article 4 of this law.

2. The applicant shall, on request, supply to the [Intellectual Property Office information on any application for a patent or other form of entitlement to protection which has been filed by the applicant in any other country and which relates to the same or essentially the same invention as that to which the application filed with the [Intellectual Property Office relates.

3. During the examination procedure the applicant may request that the application be corrected or amended, provided that the correction or amendment shall not go beyond the disclosure made in the initial application. If such a request is made the examination procedure may be postponed. The duration of any postponement shall be consistent with the time limits provided for in paragraph 5 of this article.

4. During the examination procedure, the applicant may divide the application into two or more applications, provided that each divided application shall not go beyond the disclosure made in the initial application.

Up to the time when the application is in order for grant, the application for a patent may be converted into the application for utility model, or the application for utility model into the application for a patent and the filing date shall be the date application first received.

5. The [Intellectual Property Office]* shall, according to the examination report, reach a decision as to whether or not to grant a patent within 9 months from the filing date of the application. If required, the [Intellectual Property Office may extend this period for further 12 months.

6. If it is decided to grant the patent, the formulation of the invention or the drawing of the industrial design and the particulars concerned shall be published in the Patent Gazette.

7. If the invention or industrial design has not been recognized, a copy of the examination report shall be sent to the applicant within 30 days from the date of conclusion of the examination and the report shall be kept at the patent library.

8. The industrial design which is not different with previously disclosed designs or their peculiarity shall not be considered new and original.