About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Legislative Implementation of Flexibilities - Trinidad and Tobago

Title:Sections 23 and 24 of the Patents Act No. 21 of 1996
Field of IP:Patents
Type of flexibility:Substantive examination
Summary table:PDF

Provisions of Law

(Examination as to form)

23.-(1) Where an application for a patent has a date of filing and is not withdrawn, upon the payment by the applicant of the prescribed fee, the Controller shall conduct a formalities examination.

(2) On such formalities examination the Controller shall determine whether the application complies with the provisions of this Act and rules made thereunder relating to such examination.

(3) If the Controller determines that all the formal requirements have not been complied with, he shall give the applicant an opportunity to make observations on the report and to amend the application within a specified period so as to comply with those requirements and if the applicant fails to do so the Controller may refuse the application.

(4) If the Controller refuses the application under subsection (3), he shall inform the applicant in writing of his decision and the reason therefor.

(Search and substantive examination)

24.-(1) Where the Controller is of the opinion that the application complies with the requirements of section 23 he shall, upon payment by the applicant of the prescribed fee, cause the application to be examined as to whether there has been compliance with the requirements of sections 8 to 12 and 18(3) and (4) and the rules relating thereto.

(2) For the purposes of the examination under this section the Controller may transmit the application to a duly authorized authority with which an arrangement to that effect has been made.